Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
Jackfla...
see all »
Thread Details
Rate This
39
Replies — 8054 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 20 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 15: September 13, 2004
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 15: September 13, 2004
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 15: September 13, 2004
Posted by
Bergie
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 4:31 PM
In our online feature,
Trackside with Erik and Mike
, Trains.com staff members Erik Bergstrom and Mike Yuhas go trackside and share their photo results with you. In each installment, we’ll include let our users vote on who got the best shot.
Read this week’s installment.
Please vote and then share your comments.
Erik Bergstrom
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest". To reverse this order, click
here
.
To learn about more about sorting options, visit our
FAQ page
.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 5:53 PM
I like Erik's photo better this time. I like how he got the train coming and the signal.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 6:09 PM
I voted for Eric. The diesel haze is pretty cool looking to me. I like the framing of the signals too.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
kolechovski
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 6:21 PM
Two very nice pics, and a very tough decision. I like the angle and motive power of Mike's shot. I decided to vote for bergie's shot, though. Although you can't see the second locomotive very much, I like the unique angle, and the exhaust coming out of the stacks as it lugs those doublestacks, around. Both had great pics again!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 6:31 PM
This was a tough one in my opinion. I liked the angle and haze from Erik's, but there was just something about Mike's that was very eye-catching. It basically came down to a coin toss in my mind. My vote is for Mike this week.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 6:50 PM
Both are excellent! Tough one! I voted for Mike because you can see both locos and a good part of the train.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 7:19 PM
This is the first time I'm participating in this photo competition. I've chosen Eriks photo because in my eyes it has a more dramatic appearance then Mikes 3/4 shot. (no offence Mike) I like the way the way the exhaust blurs the back of the train coming around the curve in contrast to the sharp image in the foreground. The signal adds to the viewing interest of the picture as well. Great shot Erik!!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 7:44 PM
I have to go with Erik this time around. The cool heat distortion effect, the line side singals, unmatched air conditioning unit, ability to see the train crews and the height of the photo location all add up to winner in my opinion. I do like Mike's photo though as we can see an uncommon SD45 on the point and the lovely WC paint scheme as well as the CN stenciled trailing unit.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
DICKK
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 8:24 PM
Although the exhaust plumes distorted the cars behind, they also displayed the effect of power in motion. I liked Mike's photo also but it was much more subdued.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 8:35 PM
I had to go with Mike's shot this week, for one reason: shadows. In Erik's shot, I can tell it is a beautiful sunny afternoon elsewhere, but the train was shot in the shade; a mistake in my opinion. I'm honestly not a fan of cloudy day shots either, but you have to take what you are given sometimes. Mike's shot is about the best you can do under such conditions, and it turned out nicely.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 9:10 PM
Erik's photo has a much better quality than Mike's cloudy "mode."
One note for Erik would be to maybe have a little more sunlight thru the trees but other than that a great shot Erik. You get my vote. :)
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
railman
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 9:25 PM
Okay this might make me a "flip flopper" but I am a huge fan of Eric's photo this week. I know in the past I might have made a comment or two about how the odd/ artsy/unique photos can be overdone. This one isn't. It's just plain cool.
And, it's BNSF. The railroad that passes through Monticello, MN. Can't knock the home team.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 10:17 PM
I voted for Erik's photo, the shot was more alive by having the signal in the composition.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 11:27 PM
I liked Erik's and therefor voted for it, both were good and would be great for all uses where ever printed.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Sep 13 2004 11:34 PM
Went with Eric this time. Really liked the distortion caused by the heat, which served to emphasize the engine. Great shot!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 15: September 13, 2004