Forums

|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login or register for an acount to join our online community today!

Most Useful Loco (US, and Canada Locos only)

  •  Rules

    I think we need something different then Favorite Loco topics, yes I started one a few months back, but I think we are all getting tired of them. So how about this, in your opinion what loco in the US and Canada only has been the most useful to railroading. It doesnt have to be your favorite but had the most impact on railroading and did its job the best. Real engineers I would love to hear your opinions, as well as from modelers and railfans. Now, you can only say one for each type of loco (steam, diesel, electric) you don't have to say one for each but you can say no more then one. If you can't make up your mind on diesels you can just say the series (Ex. Gp's, SD's, F's, E's, etc...) I will start it off in another post after this, these are just the rules. 

    Mike

    Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket Modeling PRR transition era operations in northern Ohio
    Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest".   To reverse this order, click here.
    To learn about more about sorting options, visit our FAQ page.
  • Diesel-Gp 38's (38's, 38-2's, 38-3's)

    Steam- 2-8-2's

    Electric-GG-1's

    Mike

    Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket Modeling PRR transition era operations in northern Ohio
  •  Wow..Ns lover and I almost have the same opinion

     

    electric-  The GG1...one of the longest running electrics

    Diesel-  The GP-38...One of the most reliable

    steam- 2-8-2  Many uses and was the most common and was capable of high speeds in both freight and passanger duty

    K-Line The Difference is in the Details
  •  alexweiihman wrote:

     Wow..Ns lover and I almost have the same opinion

     

    electric-  The GG1...one of the longest running electrics

    Diesel-  The GP-38...One of the most reliable

    steam- 2-8-2  Many uses and was the most common and was capable of high speeds in both freight and passanger duty

    Great minds think alike. Mike

    Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket Modeling PRR transition era operations in northern Ohio
  • Diesel:  GP7/GP9, especially when equipped with steam generator

    Steam:  2-8-2

    Electric:  NYC S-motor, an entire class that lasted in service for at least 60 years, if that isn't useful, I don't know what is.

    The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Diesel- SD70M with Union Pacific having around 1500 of 'em. EMD must have done something right with 'em.
    "It's a great day to be alive" "Of all the words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these, It might have been......"
  • I'm inclined to agree with most of the above! The 2-8-0 and GP38s were boody amazing, as were the GP7/9s, but for the most of all time...GP9. They've been around for 53 years, and there are plenty of them still working hard!

    Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

    Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • I think the 4-4-0 was the most useful steam locomotive.  Through the 1800's they pulled passenger and freight.  Most if not all railroads had them and some lasted into the 1950's.  It's hard to see now, but the railroad was a vital part of passenger travel and mail.  Passenger fares and mail contracts were significant for the railroads

    Enjoy

    Paul.  

    If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • GP38s are nice............but HOW CAN YOU FORGET THE SD40-2!?

    Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

    The Missabe Road: Safety First

     

  • Never have, never will!

    Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

    Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • I'd have to say the GMD1, the GP7-GP9, GP38-2, SD40 series, and the F40PH.  But of those 6 i would say the GP9, which had been used since 1955 and is still used today by CN and CPR, and my local railway the CEMR which utilizes them as their only power. Whether 567c powered or 645, those loco's keep on goin like the Energizer Bunny.

    TMC (CNR Mixed train GMD1 1063 with combine coach) (Remember always at Railway X-ing's, (Stop, Look and Listen!)
  • It is probably easier to decide which were the worst and work up the list.  I'd put the latest high horsepower mainline engines in that category.  All they can do is haul vast tonnages on mainlines and I can't see a shortline or the secondary market wanting one when they are depreciated.
  • Diesel:  I echo the GP 38-2

    Steam:  2-8-4 Berkshire

    Check out the Lost World at http://www.flickr.com/photos/lostworld/ (Use the www icon below)
  • I don't know enough about diesels to offer an educated opinion, but my best guess would be the GP7-9, maybe the RS early ones, GP 38, possibly the current SD70-80 series....what do I know, though?

    For steam, as soon as I read the question the Mike came to mind...they were like navels...everyone had them.  They did dual use, and quite well, thanks very much.  However, it would be somewhat of a travesty to not include the mighty Northern 4-8-4.  Really, they were heavier and more modern Mikes with two more truck axles.

    Electrical....way out of my depth, but the GG-1 surely gets a highly favoured position.  There must be at least one other, perhaps the NYC example given earlier.

  • The EP-5 wasn't so bad...Now I think the GG1 is #1 for electric but the EP-5 is #2
    K-Line The Difference is in the Details