Forums

|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login or register for an acount to join our online community today!

F40PH > GP38H

  • Why did Amtrak not only keep but rebuild there GP38H instead of useing newer F40PH locomotives. How dumb can you get.Angry [:(!]
    Save the F40PH!
    Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest".   To reverse this order, click here.
    To learn about more about sorting options, visit our FAQ page.
  • There must have been a reason. Amtrak isnt an idiot, they probably had a slight idea with what they wanted to do.

    Alec

    Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Not dumb at all.  A full bodied cowled F40PH is an impractical engine to use for switching.  The GP40TC (rebuillt to GP38H-3) is a road switcher, and far more utile.
    Charles Freericks
  • Also the F40s were worn out. These rebuilds were probably lower mileage units
  • The GP40TC's have a pretty interesting history.  They were originally owned by GO Transit and spent close to 20 years in Toronto suburban service.  They were sold to Amtrak who based them out of Chicago for short-haul trains, although they seem to have turned up pretty regularly on the Capitol Ltd.  After the various Genesis units went into service, they were rebuilt at Juniata into GP38H-3's in 2004-2005 for switching and M/W service.  See this link for more information  http://www.gobytrain.us/amtrak/notes/index.html#GP40PH

    The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul