Modeling the "Fargo Area Rapid Transit" in O scale 3 rail.
You need to know a lot more facts before jumping to conclusions. For example, who owns the tracks? If it is the city and there is no freight traffic they can abandon the track. Even if they don't own it they have the power of eminent domain, especially where a highway project (the bridge) is involved.
Sounds like the tourist RR is SOL.
LC
Boyd wrote:The tourist train owns all of the tracks.
Probably eminent domain then. City paid the tourist train operator for the track...
The process is called "Adverse Abandonment" within the ICC/STB. If not approved and a decision rendered at that level, it is not abandoned. In recent history, similar dumb stunts by local yokel politicians have been tried at Lincoln, NE (city land grab for a sewer), Napoleon, OH (City road widening of US-24), East St. Louis, IL (Highway re-allignment), Yuba City, CA (street widening) and Creede, CO (city opposed to re-activated rail line/ tourist train). Federal rule trumped local ego in these cases involving main line tracks or former main tracks ....sidetracks and backtracks are governed by a the state PUC or Railroad Commission and tend to be fickle in judgement(s)...
http://www.stb.dot.gov/stb/public/resources_abandonment.html
Not enough data to comment on your local situation, but cannot find MN or the locals filing for adverse abandonment or adverse discontinuance at STB
Minnesota Commercial or BNSF in Washington County?
COULD IT BE THIS:
http://www.stb.dot.gov/decisions/ReadingRoom.nsf/6c810114c3d629ef852571fd0077ee71/4be32dd73421c82c85257196006793c9?OpenDocument
Minnesota Commercial quit running on 1 mile (MP 11.81 to MP 12.80)of trackage rights over BNSF in 2005 (AB 882 2_x) but the line itself was not to be abandoned...BNSF wanted to abandon under AB-6-413X in 2005, but deferred to MNNA(Minnesota Northern/Minnesota Commercial)...This line runs along the St Croix river from the Interstate Bridge to about 1 mile north. With MNNA bowing out, they are going to abandon after meeting environmental action statement items (1/1/2007 after BNSF asked to extend the abandonment date?) The line was Ex NP/Stillwater Union Depot & Transfer/BN....where are you looking at?
Boyd wrote:That must be the one. Only the track through downtown was ripped up. At the crossings the flangeway was filled in. I guess one mile of track through downtown was owned by BN. I think BN pulled out of Stillwater in the early 90s. I talked to one of the local long time railbufs and he said its not too late to re-lay the track to connect with the UP. But the track along the river going south of downtown is in really rough shape with a few spots where the roadbed has partially washed out from under the track.
Down here in Manitoba, the Prairie Dog Central actually owns all their track on an ex CNR subdivision. They do most of the track work themselves, and they are registered as a Manitoba shortline railway like the CEMR. By next year their 126 year old 4-4-0, Old No.3 should be completely restored with a brand new boiler from Saskatoon Boiler.
http://www.pdcrailway.com/video_clips.htm