Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
2
Replies — 793 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 18 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Chessie Locomotives...huh?
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
Chessie Locomotives...huh?
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Sat, Apr 22 2006 10:53 PM
I was looking at the chessie system and its coal operations recently and was
astonished at its choice of motive power. It's one thing to operate coal trains with four axle power in the first place but to do it in the mountains of WV and PA? How did they pull that off? It was rumored that chessie avoided six axle
because of the fuel crisis of the late 70's/early 80's. Perhaps they felt GP40-2's
performed well enough for their needs while being fuel efficient at the same time. What ever the reason..What's up with that?!! Just strap on a trio of SD40-2's and get it over with![%-)]
SandboxerG
(new to forum...be nice)
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest". To reverse this order, click
here
.
To learn about more about sorting options, visit our
FAQ page
.
Posted by
monkeyman2
on
Sun, Apr 23 2006 4:50 PM
Most coal trains were operated with RDMT mother slug sets. This added a little more traction and gave the crew better control of the train than slaping SD40's on the point.
RDMTs were designed to supply added tractive effort so to speak, which doubled the power a loan SD40 could put out.
Come and vist my website- www.freewebs.com/bcanda
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
CSSHEGEWISCH
on
Mon, Apr 24 2006 12:31 PM
Based on what I've seen, most of the GP40/slug sets are used in mine run service, lots of switching and probably a fair amount of track unsuitable for six-axle power. Since the job is primarily low-speed, horsepower demands are low but more tractive effort is needed at low speeds, making a slug set particularly useful.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Chessie Locomotives...huh?