Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
6
Replies — 764 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 18 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Tender Construction
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
Tender Construction
Posted by
mcs08097
on
Wed, Feb 8 2006 12:42 PM
I have been doing a bit of research on steam locomotive tenders. I have two items that I have little or no info about. The first is the dimples on the end of the tender (and the front of the loco). Found something that said these were used to support a pole placed between the tender (loco) and a car on an adjacent siding to move the car out onto the track when the loco was facing the wrong direction to enter the spur to remove the car. I have seen pictures of long poles suspended below the sides of tenders that seem to lend credibility to this explanation.
The second is the chains that connect from the tender to the trucks. Some say these were to limit turning radius (why???) and another bit I found said that they kept the trucks with the tender during derailments (again why?).
If anyone can confirm, debunk, or supply credible explanations, I would be grateful.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest". To reverse this order, click
here
.
To learn about more about sorting options, visit our
FAQ page
.
Posted by
ndbprr
on
Wed, Feb 8 2006 3:35 PM
Yes the dimples are called poling pockets which was outlawed by the FRA or some other federal agency. They were used to move a car on a parallel track with a large wooden pole that had a metal ring around the ends to prevent it from splintering. It was a very dangerous practice and many people were hurt poling cars. I doubt that tender chains were used to limit turning radius. They were probably a safety item somehow but darned if I can figure it out. It was common practice. Maybe in the hopes of keeping them with the tender in the event of a derailment since they are different from the frieght car trucks.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
ndbprr
on
Thu, Feb 9 2006 4:52 PM
I just had another thought. Chains could also have been used to prevent side to side movement when the water got sloshing around. It seems posible that enough harmonic movement could cause enough force to separate the tender from its truck and possibly roll it over.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
David_Telesha
on
Thu, Feb 9 2006 8:13 PM
The chains mostly were to keep the trucks close to and under the car during a derailment. Some passenger cars had the same thing (Check out pics of the 1955 wreck of the Federal in BPT, CT).
Why?
Well, I'd feel safer knowing a multi-ton hunk of steel won't come flying onto or through the side car during an overturn derailment. Plus it keeps the car from wildly flopping off to the side off the truck.
Though your suggestion about keeping the tender steady with the water load shift is interesting. Although the crew has enough to worry about in a steamer cab to have to worry about the trucks crushing them in a derailment - or worrying about the tender tipping - maybe your through is correct too.
David Telesha
New Haven Railroad
- www.NHRHTA.org
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
ndbprr
on
Fri, Feb 10 2006 4:29 PM
I learned somthing from this question. I posted the questiuon oin another forum and this is the answer given:
Chaining trucks was done to prevent them from turning sideways when they derailed. A truck turning sideways could cause the car to climb over the rails and turn over. Chains can also be found on passenger cars and special duty freight cars. Other structural devices were also employed to prevent the truck from turning too far.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
jsoderq
on
Sun, Feb 12 2006 6:40 AM
Tenders have interior baffles to prevent sloshing, same as tank cars.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
BR60103
on
Sun, Feb 12 2006 9:39 PM
Most of the freight cars of the time had poling pockets for the other end of the pole.
Some yards had poling cars (so I'm told) so they could do some switching from a parallel track.
But nobody really wanted to be between the loco and the car to put the pole in position.
--David
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Tender Construction