Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
57
Replies — 30545 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 21 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Rochelle Webcam Update
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
«
2
3
4
5
6
»
Rochelle Webcam Update
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Oct 13 2003 7:24 AM
Please don't let viewers play with the camera direction, we all know what the last cam was like. If we can't get sound (Great idea), maybe trackside signal indications as an insert or option...
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
kwboehm
on
Wed, Oct 22 2003 11:07 AM
Well, I guess my thunder has been stolen. So I'll second the idea on the larger screen, radio traffic, and signal indications. My question is will the scanner traffic be like having sound, requiring a larger bandwidth, or is there something that can be done by Trains.com where it won't mess anything up for the City of Rochelle? I think the camera has been great, especially since I can't get to Rochelle that often. Also, has Trains thought about adding webcams to other locations?
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
kwboehm
on
Wed, Oct 22 2003 11:07 AM
Well, I guess my thunder has been stolen. So I'll second the idea on the larger screen, radio traffic, and signal indications. My question is will the scanner traffic be like having sound, requiring a larger bandwidth, or is there something that can be done by Trains.com where it won't mess anything up for the City of Rochelle? I think the camera has been great, especially since I can't get to Rochelle that often. Also, has Trains thought about adding webcams to other locations?
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Oct 22 2003 4:22 PM
Dint hold your breath KWBOEHM,I got emailed by them due to them not wanting to ask the city of Rochelle aksing them for more stuff or something like that.But ya never know
what Trains.Com will do on Updating or Ading New Cams,Etc.But if ya want some info www.livetrains.com has One Cam and will be adding a New one.The Belen New Mexico,but its held back a few months due to things.Thats all I know as of now hope this helps
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Oct 22 2003 4:22 PM
Dint hold your breath KWBOEHM,I got emailed by them due to them not wanting to ask the city of Rochelle aksing them for more stuff or something like that.But ya never know
what Trains.Com will do on Updating or Ading New Cams,Etc.But if ya want some info www.livetrains.com has One Cam and will be adding a New one.The Belen New Mexico,but its held back a few months due to things.Thats all I know as of now hope this helps
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Jan 8 2004 6:25 PM
LIKE MOST OF YOU I AGREE TO UPDATE THE CAM!!... THEY ALSO SHOULD ADD STOCKTON, CA TEHACHAPI LOOP, CAJON PASS, SOLDIER SUMMIT (CO), DOLTON, ETC.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Jan 8 2004 6:25 PM
LIKE MOST OF YOU I AGREE TO UPDATE THE CAM!!... THEY ALSO SHOULD ADD STOCKTON, CA TEHACHAPI LOOP, CAJON PASS, SOLDIER SUMMIT (CO), DOLTON, ETC.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jan 20 2004 1:10 AM
I am thankful that we have what we have, I normally sit here at night and watch it, and I can look back at some of what went through during the day. While yes some of the other things would be nice, why ask for more and possibly take a risk of losing what we have? Lets enjoy what we do have.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jan 20 2004 1:10 AM
I am thankful that we have what we have, I normally sit here at night and watch it, and I can look back at some of what went through during the day. While yes some of the other things would be nice, why ask for more and possibly take a risk of losing what we have? Lets enjoy what we do have.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Allen Jenkins
on
Tue, Jan 20 2004 1:33 AM
I like the Rochelle webcam, fixed though it is. Sound would be nice, or some other way to alert of an approaching train. Of the webcams Iv'e seen, I like the Rochelle ops the best. That string of utility poles down the BN stretch looks temporary, the last visit I made I didn't see guy wires, and one is too close to the UP tracks to be permanent. I like when the unit coal trains go buy and the train looks like it stops and backs up! I consider the 2 or 3 second delay training for 3rd PlanIt's Demo! (TrackPlanning.Com)Enjoy Your Hobby!
Allen/Backyard
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Allen Jenkins
on
Tue, Jan 20 2004 1:33 AM
I like the Rochelle webcam, fixed though it is. Sound would be nice, or some other way to alert of an approaching train. Of the webcams Iv'e seen, I like the Rochelle ops the best. That string of utility poles down the BN stretch looks temporary, the last visit I made I didn't see guy wires, and one is too close to the UP tracks to be permanent. I like when the unit coal trains go buy and the train looks like it stops and backs up! I consider the 2 or 3 second delay training for 3rd PlanIt's Demo! (TrackPlanning.Com)Enjoy Your Hobby!
Allen/Backyard
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Jan 23 2004 6:01 AM
Hi I am deaf student
I come from New Zealand
I love to watch when trains is coming (BNSF) but problem very slow web cam and there are no sound
I think need update for web cam easy to see very clear day time at night time some time I can see with very bright light when trains coming
I am very interested about america rail what look like and what sound like
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Jan 23 2004 6:01 AM
Hi I am deaf student
I come from New Zealand
I love to watch when trains is coming (BNSF) but problem very slow web cam and there are no sound
I think need update for web cam easy to see very clear day time at night time some time I can see with very bright light when trains coming
I am very interested about america rail what look like and what sound like
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
eolafan
on
Fri, Jan 23 2004 6:13 PM
For this foamer, any railcam is a good railcam!
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
eolafan
on
Fri, Jan 23 2004 6:13 PM
For this foamer, any railcam is a good railcam!
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
«
2
3
4
5
6
»
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Rochelle Webcam Update