Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
maxman
Jackfla...
see all ยป
Thread Details
Rate This
70
Replies — 14739 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 18 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 45: January 16, 2006
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
5
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 45: January 16, 2006
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Jan 16 2006 10:07 PM
Ugh.. another wedgie shot.. yes it was technically much clearer. but its so old seeing 3/4 wedge shots no matter how technically sharp and crisp they are.. I had to go with Eric as it really showed night shooting plus although portions of the shot weren't clear, the engine/tender were very sharp & crisp.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
PennsyHoosier
on
Mon, Jan 16 2006 10:31 PM
Erik's photo was fun, but Mike's has a wonderful "feel" to it. Mike's got my vote.
Lawrence, The Pennsy Hoosier
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Conrail9990
on
Mon, Jan 16 2006 11:08 PM
I, like many others, like Mike's night shot the best, but still voted for his day shot. Primarily because of the setting, the composition, and the unusual subject matter considering the location/RR.
But kudos to, to Eric, a nice "Model" RR shot, especially in a night setting. (lol)
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
broarthur
on
Mon, Jan 16 2006 11:25 PM
I voted for the night shot, low shutter speed shots are always tough to get all subjects without blur. It's going to be a great year!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Texas Zepher
on
Mon, Jan 16 2006 11:33 PM
I didn't vote. I thought the whole premise was that the photos were being taken with the same brand and type of camera therefore removing technicalities leaving only the skill and eye of the photographer. A Digital Rebel with its stock lens is no match for a EOS 20D with a L class lens (only Ls can do f1.2). It is no longer a fair contest.
.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
ValorStorm
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 12:00 AM
Bergie's shot of the lillipution train is the better picture and gets my vote. But I too would've voted for Mike's night photo.
Disproportionate number of "newbies" on here this time. Welcome to all of you. And it's your turn to bring the munchies. Initiation, ya' know.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 12:00 AM
I voted for mike even though I thought the photo was a little dull.
I found the blurred people too much of a distraction to rate it first,
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Fred_Parkinson
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 6:40 AM
I found the blured "motion" on the left side of Eric's, along with the engineer directing his gaze to the left, to be distracting. Mike's was pretty conventional, but it flowed well.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 6:52 AM
The photo quality is the real winner not the scale. This is why I went with Erik this week..
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 8:31 AM
Eric's shot had some movement in the photo that I thought detracted from the over all quality of the shot.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 8:40 AM
Today's freight trains certainly have lost their character and strongly resemble plastic models. No more Pratt or Howe truss cars and crummies. But, as far as subject and composition, the UP makes for a nice shot. However, the overhang of the station roof makes the steamer seem three-dimentional, so my vote is based on that.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
jjackso8
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 8:49 AM
Well after much thought, I voted for Erik's photo. At first I thought the Blurred action of the folks loading was distracting but the more I looked the more I thought LIVE ACTION!! It goes with the LIVE STEAM and Dead Smoke!! I think that the steam release created some of the glare form the station lights but again this just contributed to the ACTION!!
Boy! Mike's night shot was really something, too bad he did not enter it in this week's contest. But there is always another contest week ahead. Well welcome back to both of you. Happy New Year as well.
In response to the one responder that commented about the new camera versus the old camera, so what. If you enter any photo contest there are seldom if ever rules that tstate that everyone must use the same camera.
So Mike and Erik keep up the good work!!!
John Jackson Birmingham, MI Detroit, Woodbridge & Birmingham RR HO Standard Gauge Protolanced from CN/NorfolkSouthern Industrial connector road located in northern Michigan No Particular Era
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 9:55 AM
I agree with Loco. Mike, I would have used the night shot irrespective of the grain. It was dramatic, and with any night shot from behind the locomotive light, as you look down the track it opens up the "theatre of the mind" to the concept of "what is down there," kind of a take off of the old Green Hornet's, "Who know's what evil lurks . . . " Is there a broken rail down there? Is there some kind of obstruction? Is there another train ahead that we can't see? On and on and on. Personally, the shot of the the train in the cut was a little "same old-same old." The rainy night shot was unique, in my view.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
rojakaniaa
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 10:05 AM
Mike I actually liked your night time shot better than the one you chose. There was just to much glare on Eriks' shot.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
wcnut
on
Tue, Jan 17 2006 10:08 AM
Real vs. Scale aside, the shot of the scale train has a lot going on with interesting composition, colors, visual textures, etc. The CP, although I like the harsh perspective the fill adds to the composition, is just a traditional wedge. Its a good wedgie, but I favor the little guy this time.
Greg
"wcnut"
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
5
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 45: January 16, 2006