Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296
Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/
Mechanical Department "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."
The Missabe Road: Safety First
QUOTE: Originally posted by kreez Dang that's really a drag you've gotta pay for a motel and your away from home so long. So do you have a schedule that you work, like weekdays 9-5 sorta thing, or do you give your availibility and then they schedule you on the days you are available? --- most jobs for us (CSX) are either regularly scheduled runs, with a return run to get you back home the next day, or a "pool" where you go out every third day or so with a day off every other week. 'Stang is of course correct about the 12 hour rule (federal law actually, which also specifies at least an 8-hour rest period after your rail service). This becomes interesting if you have, say a scheduled train on Friday, but you are currently on a train working Thursday night. If you take your mandatory rest period, you won't be available for your next train! This is "crew caller error," and you usually get paid anyway for the Friday trip, even if you didn't actually work it (depends on the job and your union contract). ---- And also do you find your job fun? It seems like it could be quite entertaining to work with huge machines like trains all the time. Then again I assume there's really boring long drawn out periods that seem like they're never going to end, and times that the physical work is exhausting. But it seems like it could, for the most part be fun. I know working at Wal-Mart is fun for about 10 minutes, but having a career working with trains seems like it could be fun almost all the time. What's your take on it Red04 or anyone else that catchs this thread that works for a railroad.
QUOTE: Originally posted by kreez Two questions… 1.When it comes to lets say a couple Dash 9s hauling a completely loaded 40 car auto rack train, heading down a steep grade like Donner Pass in the middle of winter during heavy snow fall, how would the descent be handled by the engineer? Would the train brakes be partially applied along with dynamic braking continuously the whole way down? Or would the train brakes be applied, released, applied, released, or possibly another method? ---- 'Stang is right about this. You use your dynamic brakes on the engines, and apply the air brakes on the train either at the top of the grade or part-way down it. Once the air brakes grab, and if the train is light, you may end up PULLING your train downhill. This is OK, the brakes are designed for that, although this practice (power braking) is frowned on for long distances of light trains. Unfortunately, that's the only thing that works sometimes! It's not unheard of to STALL going downhill if your train is light and the brakes are very good, so usually an engineer will start with some dynamic, see how that holds, then apply more brake as needed. Also, you mentioned snow - this makes the rails slippery, so many engineers will apply the engine air brakes (independent brakes) LIGHTLY in addition to the dynamic brakes, because the brake shoes will clean off the wheels as they go, making for better traction. I've seen them apply light independent brakes going UPHILL - this sounds insane, but clean wheels go faster uphill! --- 2. My second question involves speed limits. If the Freight speed limit along a given section is 35 mph, and the train's cargo permits full speed. Would the train be kept at around 34-36 mph, or would the engineer stay well below the limit at lets say 25-30 mph? Or is it just the engineer’s personal pref.?