QUOTE: Originally posted by coborn35 We got a BNSF ACe up here.
QUOTE: Originally posted by RR Redneck Originally posted by TrainboyH16-44 QUOTE: Originally posted by RR RedneckMembers can openly make suggestions about virtually anything (exept for downsizing the forums) and request pretty much anything that they want. He's just sore because so many people think that there are too many catagories, and he won't change it...in fact, he is always adding more...it's getting hard to navagate...
QUOTE: Originally posted by RR RedneckMembers can openly make suggestions about virtually anything (exept for downsizing the forums) and request pretty much anything that they want.
Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296
Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/
Mechanical Department "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."
The Missabe Road: Safety First
QUOTE: Originally posted by Gluefinger I'm not sure why you guys are so focused (ha!) on shutter speeds; I've never found anything above 1/500 to be necessary yet, and can even manage with 1/125 on cloudy days and/or with slow trains. QUOTE: Originally posted by trainboyH16-44 If you look at the pic of 8502 http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b274/trainboysd40/img032.jpg You'll notice that the sides are slightly more blurred than the centre, any explaination for this? Perhaps the lens is zooming or unzooming ever so slightly while I'm taking the picture? And is ghosting a good thing in this case? That's because of a low aperture (f/stop). It's called depth of field; the higher you go in f/stops, the less light gets into the camera, but also the more background is in focus. QUOTE: Originally posted by coborn35 then we saw Union Pacific train #118, which was being operated by the same engineer we saw running it around 3 weeks ago. Eh, a UP train with a number symbol? CN Train 118 is an intermodal train and probably the one you mean.
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainboyH16-44 If you look at the pic of 8502 http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b274/trainboysd40/img032.jpg You'll notice that the sides are slightly more blurred than the centre, any explaination for this? Perhaps the lens is zooming or unzooming ever so slightly while I'm taking the picture? And is ghosting a good thing in this case?
QUOTE: Originally posted by coborn35 then we saw Union Pacific train #118, which was being operated by the same engineer we saw running it around 3 weeks ago.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Gluefinger Well, UP does not have any trains using number symbols. Perhaps it was run-through power or power-by-the-hour. Also, there are about 25 SD45s left.
QUOTE: Originally posted by alstom Okay Matt, looks like your account is back up and running at my forums. I really hope that it works this time, you don't know how long I've been working on this situation. as for the train situation, let's just say, it's the CSX New Castle Subdivison - 'nuff said! ............