Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
58
Replies — 11910 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 34: July 11, 2005
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 34: July 11, 2005
Posted by
trainster1073
on
Thu, Jul 14 2005 11:29 AM
Sorry Erik, Mikes just had that little twist to it that made up my mind. One being clear and sharp. Then again Erik like Mike said if you showed the end of the tanker. Also if it was more clear. But hey theres's always next week!!!!
Dustin
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
espeefoamer
on
Thu, Jul 14 2005 3:26 PM
Wow! You guys are good. It was a tough one this week,but Mike wins this week.The colors were brighter and almost jumped off the screen.Also I liked the fact that the engine crew was visible in the cab.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Jul 14 2005 4:12 PM
None of these images really moves me - the stuff at dusk is artzy at best. My question is - why shoot at that hour when regular daylight photos are much better?
The bottom line - those photos don't talk to me. Mike's photo was the best of the lot.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
sporegonfan
on
Thu, Jul 14 2005 4:27 PM
Difficult choice this time around. I like Erik's new location; a real difference from the usual hill. The lash-up was pretty neat, too.
Mike's had some great color contrast. Granted, it did look a lot like one of Erik's earlier shots, with the hill and the head-on shot of the train. But I went with it anyway, maybe because of the sharper focus, but probably because I like WSOR's colors more than BNSF.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Jul 14 2005 5:51 PM
I too was dismayed by Erik's softness of his shot. If it wasn't the atmospheric conditions it was the fact that his lens was wide open at f5.6. A couple of stops smaller and it may have looked sharper.
Paul
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Jul 15 2005 11:09 AM
I liked Mike's photo the best, for the same reasons others stated. I have to admit that I was a little worried when I saw that picture of the zoo train.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Jul 15 2005 11:29 AM
Sorry Erik, Mike's photo was just more appealing. Great head-on shot!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
shawnbecher
on
Fri, Jul 15 2005 11:57 AM
Sorry, I have to go off on a rant here. Both of those pictures would have been rejected by www.railpictures.net because they are so darned picky. Erik's photo would be rejected because of poor cropping and its "too dark". Mike's phot would be rejected because the train is in a shadow and its "too dark". I should know. Those guys rejected my 5 best photos.
I don't mean to discredit Erik or Mike. You photos are both awesome. I mean to discredit www.railpictures.net because they are overly picky about what they will post to their site.
Sorry for the off topic rant.
Shawn - MP 116 CP Watertown Sub
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
ValorStorm
on
Sat, Jul 16 2005 1:12 AM
You voters have GOT to be kidding. I liked Mike's. But I LOVED Erik's.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
tmcc man
on
Sat, Jul 16 2005 2:17 PM
i went with mikes, the entire picture is clear and crisp.
Colin
from prr.railfan.net
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Sterling1
on
Sat, Jul 16 2005 3:32 PM
This was another tight one, but this time I went for something different than the typical pumpkin . . . so it's help calm me down as BNSF gets rid of the red and silver on the Santa Fe units . . .
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Sat, Jul 16 2005 4:15 PM
Enjoy all photos from both of you. Am not a photography expert, just know what I like when I see it and have liked all photos from both. Unless you both took photos of the same scene, to me, it would be hard to judge that one was better than the other. So keep up the good work and I will continue to enjoy them all. "Doodlebug"
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
kolechovski
on
Mon, Jul 18 2005 1:28 PM
Erik's would have been better with the whole tank car shown. Mike's looked good, and I like how well the conductor was illuminated.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
lhtalbot
on
Tue, Jul 19 2005 9:44 PM
Had to go with Mike this time. I guess the thing that does it is the human interest seeing the 2 crew members.
Larry
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 34: July 11, 2005