QUOTE: Originally posted by lrenee I'd have to agree that neither photo was exceptional. I liked Mike's a little better because he took a few seconds(?) to consider the negative lighting situation. Maybe you should take another field trip...out of the northern Mid-West!
QUOTE: From Vol. 26 Recap by Mike Yuhas "If this photo looks familiar, it's because it was my entry for the Volume 21 edition of Trackside with Mike and Erik. "
QUOTE: Originally posted by MacdonaldRB Meself finally had tae ask a question an' comment on the photos tha' hae been posted for vote'en on. First - I thought the photo o' the Amtrack train tae be far better than the static one (I canna rember which wast which) due tae the fact tha' it shows speed an' action tae which meself does wi' waterfall photos (usually shot at 1/8th o' a secound or slower). Now for the question - How dae ye lads get tae photograph the tarins? Here in Memphis, TN if we stop alang syde a set o' tracks or try tae shoot frae an o'erpass we get chased aff by the RR police or the local PD and /or the Sheriff's Dept. Some o' us hae been threatened with arrest, confiscation o' film an' camera. Meself canna afford tae lose either one ast I dae freelance photography tae suppliment my SS money (my age ist 65).
QUOTE: Originally posted by thefox I just read the Vol. 26 recap, one thing which Erik overlooked (or just ignored), but let Mike get away with... was this caption under Mike's UP shot: QUOTE: From Vol. 26 Recap by Mike Yuhas "If this photo looks familiar, it's because it was my entry for the Volume 21 edition of Trackside with Mike and Erik. " It seemed amusing to me if no one else. [:)] Mike seems to be very set on the name change.[:D]