Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
88
Replies — 19329 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 21: December 6, 2004
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
5
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 21: December 6, 2004
Posted by
FThunder11
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 7:37 AM
I liked the UP rain photo, I think it had more life
Kevin Farlow Colorado Springs
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 7:44 AM
Mike and Erik,
How about some comments on increased noise with increased ISO? How do you deal with it? How do you minimize it? I liked both shots but the rain drops in the headlight sold me this time.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 8:14 AM
Mike gets my vote. I just like the illusion of "cutting" through the falling rain that the headlight creates. In my opinion, a very good shot. A tough choice, but I went with Mike's photo.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
trainboy81
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 8:32 AM
Sorry Mike................
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
ReimanTrainfan
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 8:37 AM
Great Photos again this week guys. But I had to vote for Mike......The rain falling through the headlight, reminded me of snow, and added to the shot. I felt that Erik's shot was just too dark, and I did not like the light beam through the shot either....
Whoever said you cannot buy happiness forgot about puppies!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
jjlamkin
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 8:43 AM
Erik & Mike, GREAT shots. I had to go with Mike's shot again. This was a tough one, Erik's looks cool, the loco with snow all over the front, the only thing that was distracting was the "tracer" line running behind the loco. Mike's looks cool, the lighting effects are kind of eerie. I am also partial to UP, I have a relative who is an engineer on the UP.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 8:48 AM
I chose Mike's photo for it's effects. The headlights and rain look almost animated, as if they were added digitally, but as you follow the train to the left you see the reality of the train come into view. The ambiant lighting brings out good detail and provides just enough light to see the rest of the train.
Erik's photo was very good, too, with the light of the approaching train illuminating the front of the holed-up unit, but I felt the single light streak took away from the effect. Had there been more lights on the passing unit the picture would have been more dramatic.
It was a tough decision!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 8:54 AM
WOW . . . Thanks guys, both great shots!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
PRRK4s1361
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 8:55 AM
You guys are really making things tough...both are really awesome. But the more train I see the better so I went with Mike. But I have to admit that Eric's is a VERY close second. The effects are great except the single streak across the picture. If the engineer had left the headlight on the second streak probably would have made a big difference; but of course, we must be considerate of our fellow workers. I'm sure you wouldn't want a bright headlight into your face. Great work.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 9:19 AM
Wow! What a tough choice. Well, let me break it down:
Mike's photo: ex-SP UP patched engine, fading light, headlights illuminating the rain falling.
Erik's photo: ex-SF engine in Warbonnet paint, darkness, cool effect, snow.....and, what decided it for me (and I don't think it has been mentioned) a star (look straight up from the nose.)
Great shots guys. If I ever get my Digital Rebel, you are making it so I will actually attempt some night shots and hopefully have some successes. Thanks!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 9:32 AM
Both pictures were wonderful this month. I had to give the edge to Mike. His photo encompasses the '
romantic
' notions surrounding train movement that is so captivating to those of us who love to watch a passing flurry. I would have loved to have been there to hear its roar as well. Outstanding job, wait, I think I can hear it!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
kwboehm
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 9:41 AM
I really loved Bergie's shot. The headlight from the approaching train gave it a very nice effect. And thanks, you also answered a question I was about to ask regarding your cameras and night photography.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
mandelswamp
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 9:44 AM
In my opinion, the contest was not very close. Erik's picture is okay but I thought the streak from the southbound locomotive's back walkway was a negative. If the other locomotive was in the shot too, then the source of the streak would be understood but as presented, its a mystery without Erik having to explain it. Mike's picture captured the railroad in action with the locomotive's lights piercing the rain and a good view of not just the locomotives but also some of the train's consist. Mike won my vote this time.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
cherokee woman
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 9:49 AM
Both Mike's and Erik's photos were great, but I voted for Erik's shot. It was
really neat.
cherokee woman "O'Toole's law: Murphy was an optimist."
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Dec 7 2004 9:55 AM
Bravo Eric! The results from your Night Photo session is awesome! Night photography was one thing I enjoyed expirementing with a long time ago, but I hardly ever try it anymore. It seems to be getting harder to find willing subjects where it's safe to set up a tripod and shoot away for a while.
Alan Quigley
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
5
»
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 21: December 6, 2004