Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
73
Replies — 13041 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 20 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 18: October 25, 2004
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
5
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 18: October 25, 2004
Posted by
Bergie
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 10:16 AM
In our online feature,
Trackside with Erik and Mike
, Trains.com staff members Erik Bergstrom and Mike Yuhas go trackside and share their photo results with you. In each installment, we’ll include let our users vote on who got the best shot.
Read this week’s installment.
Please vote and then share your comments.
Erik Bergstrom
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest". To reverse this order, click
here
.
To learn about more about sorting options, visit our
FAQ page
.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 11:09 AM
Iam no photography critic but voted for picture #2, thought picture #1 was a little hazy. wstolper@yahoo.com
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 12:35 PM
I voted for #2. I see lone locos all the time and its nice to whole trains. I also enjoy seeing the grade behind and below the train.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 2:46 PM
I went for #1. The dark sky really offsets the engine. I prefer the look of the UP to the CP(guessing it is CP from the paint scheme, be gentle if I am wrong[swg]).
Guys, again you have given us two good shots. I have yet to see any that I didn't like in any of the submissions so far.
How about a Trains.com calendar??? Each month could have a split shot of an installment of Trackside.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 3:32 PM
I had to go with the first one this time around. I guess it just pulled me in with the "fall colors" of the engines and grass, and then the darker clouds in the sky. Just seems like the perfect picture for this time of the year!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 3:40 PM
#2
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Noah Hofrichter
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 5:46 PM
Had too go with number two this time, like the upgrade in the background.
Noah
Click the image above to visit my website, Badger Rails. My Model Railroad Club's website:
http://sandhousecrew.webng.com
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 6:50 PM
Both photos have good lighting but #1's is more dramatic. The yellow locomotives contrast really well with the dark sky and the golden grass. Also, the old pole adds to the composition and shows times past.
Had to go with Photo #1 this week.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
tabeckett
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 7:31 PM
I voted for #2, you have to like faded paint SD 40s!!
Tom Beckett Keeping the freight moving by road and rail
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
DICKK
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 7:44 PM
I voted for number 1. I believe that they are AC4400CW units and power is what they project even without a consist attached.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
fievel
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 7:45 PM
Both shots are great ! I went with No. 2,though. Just love the sense of raw power
grinding upgrade.
Cascade Green Forever !
GET RICH QUICK !! Count your Blessings.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 7:54 PM
I picked #1 for 2 reasons:
1.) I like the darker sky
2.) I like the road and power better.
But, they were close, and I'd hang an 8X10 of either in my train room.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 7:55 PM
It would have to be #2 this week. Looking at #1 is like watching a strip show; barenaked is all I can say.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
FrankStratton
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 7:55 PM
#2 - I prefer to see working trains and obviously this one is working.
For all we know UP (#1) is just sitting there going nowhere. [:)]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
djjoe
on
Mon, Oct 25 2004 7:56 PM
I liked the quality of the light in #1, 'tho it did throw a distracting shadow. #2 suffered imo from too much foreshortening from the tele-lens.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
5
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 18: October 25, 2004