Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
53
Replies — 14333 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 20 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 5: April 5, 2004
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 5: April 5, 2004
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Apr 6 2004 1:53 PM
I voted for 2 simply because it was clearer. To me it showed more of the train which is what I and the average viewer is after
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
gannbb1
on
Tue, Apr 6 2004 8:02 PM
Can't believe I voted for the long lens shot again! I think this is the third time, but couldn't vote against that POWERFULL image. Photo 1 is in many ways artistically more pleasing but to a railfan art is describing a TRAIN!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Apr 6 2004 10:04 PM
I liked them both, but I voted for No. 1 because I like seeing more of the locos. They seem rather compressed in No. 2. Do you have a rule against using photo processing software, like Microsoft PhotoDraw or Adobe PhotoShop? With either of those you could crop the sky and ground from No. 1 and have a nice panoramic shot, and you could brighten up the dark areas on the right side.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Apr 6 2004 11:21 PM
I vote for number 2
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Apr 7 2004 12:06 AM
#1 is a realy good photo except that it is underexposed. If not for that I would have voted for it.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Apr 7 2004 12:12 AM
I voted for No 2 simply because it was the more dramatic of the two. However, it is also the most common photo angle, and when viewing dozens of pictures taken from that angle it is a relief to see one taken from the position of Photo 1. Photo 1 also needs a bit of work on the curves in Photoshop to bring it up to the visual standard of Photo 2.
Evan
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
StephenDx
on
Wed, Apr 7 2004 3:28 AM
I see having voted that I am in the minority. Having said that, I agree that P1 is rather dark. [:D] What made me go for P1 was the expanse of blue above and the recently plowed field below with the strong consist of loco's working hard with a long freight drag arrowing through the middle splitting the two.
On the other hand, P2 is a close up shot by comparison but the foreground distracts the eye with the dried scrubs. Not to mention the arms of a telephone pole arm sticking out the front of the loco. [:-,]
For whatever my [2c] is worth, P1 appeals to me more.
StephenDx: Computers and trains are my greatest interests
GMT +12hrs (+13 in summer)
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Apr 7 2004 7:16 AM
I'm late! oops. Anyway, I voted for #1, I don't care that I'm in the minority, I just liked the compisition of #1 and yes, while a little dark, the colors were much more vivid and attention grabbing. But thats just me. And, as I always do, I will post a photo of my own, taken this past Sunday.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Apr 7 2004 4:28 PM
I voted for picture 2 based on the fact that is clearer and a bit brighter, however, photo 1 would be a great candidate to blow up to a huge size and hang on a wall. I am a sucker for a deep blue sky.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Apr 7 2004 5:38 PM
I picked no. 2 because of the angle and lighting. If there were sounds and smells, it would have come through better also. The position for no. 2 is perfect for all of the above reasons. HWCjr
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Noah Hofrichter
on
Wed, Apr 7 2004 6:50 PM
I liked photo one better because you can see the three different paint schemes of the locomotives well, but i do agree it's too dark.
Noah
Click the image above to visit my website, Badger Rails. My Model Railroad Club's website:
http://sandhousecrew.webng.com
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Apr 8 2004 2:56 PM
Voted for photo no. 2. Although I didn't feel it was a lot better than no. 1. Wasn't hugely impressed with either of them compared to some of the previous photo's in the series.
However, I am enjoying the series immensely, great idea Boys, many thanks.
Andy. Tunbridge Wells, Kent, England.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Apr 9 2004 7:38 AM
This wasn't as easy as it appears to be for most others. While I first thought #2 was better because you did have the power of the train coming right at you and the train was better framed in the picture, the more I looked at #1 it grew on me. The color of the sky was much more dramatic and with just the sky and bare ground in front the train stands out with no other distractions. Not being as close did not distract from the overall picture. I voted for #1. The last two weeks have both had good shots.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Apr 9 2004 8:01 AM
i think the second picture looks better. Has land marks . The first one looks like the train is flying. Thanks for your time. L.D.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Sterling1
on
Fri, Apr 9 2004 11:35 AM
Liked No.2, with the train coming head on. No.1 a little dark, but showed the broadside of the locomotives despite the low lighting.
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 5: April 5, 2004