Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
53
Replies — 14486 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 20 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 5: April 5, 2004
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 5: April 5, 2004
Posted by
Bergie
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 3:43 PM
In our new online feature,
Trackside with Erik and Mike
, Trains.com staff members Erik Bergstrom and Mike Yuhas go trackside and share with you their results, as well as what they’ve learned. In each installment, we’ll include let our users vote on who got the best shot.
Read this week’s installment.
Erik Bergstrom
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest". To reverse this order, click
here
.
To learn about more about sorting options, visit our
FAQ page
.
Posted by
DICKK
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 5:15 PM
Voted for number 2. Number 1 seemed just a bit far away and I liked the angle on number 2.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 6:34 PM
I really liked the brightness of photo 2, It may not show as much of the train but I prefer taking pictures during the day instead of what seams like at night. LOL
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
ShaunCN
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 8:03 PM
I think Photo 2 is better because it is closer than photo 1 and phot 1 is abit dark.
derailment? what derailment? All reports of derailments are lies. Their are no derailments within a hundreed miles of here.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
SteveGibson
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 8:04 PM
I liked Photo #2 better - just seems like a better angle, more colorful, & shows off the power of the freight.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Railrunnin
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 8:13 PM
ummm, I thought there was a prize behind door number two,
and a better pic imo for reasons others have noted
railrunnin
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 8:23 PM
#2 was much closer and brighter
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 8:40 PM
I voted for no.2, I thought photo 1 could have used some cropping to get rid of some of the foreground. The best shot, i think, was the first shot in the article..the Burlington Northern. As all I ever see is CP and CPR, a green train is a treat!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
FrankStratton
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 8:41 PM
Darn, you were less than a mile from my house while you took the shots at Chillicothe and less than a mile from where I was born and raised at the Toluca shots. Sure wish I had known you were going to be in the area, I would have trotted over and said Hi. Well I have to agree with the others that #2 is better. Had #1 been brighter and a little closer it could have won hands down. Keep up the good work fellows, you guys are coming up with the best of pictures, especially when it is of BNSF.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 9:46 PM
I liked picture 2 better No.1 was not as good
DOGGY
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 10:29 PM
I voted for No.2 although to me it should have taken at about the same angle as No.1. No.1 has beautiful background & would have got my vote but it was taken from to far away No.2 got my vote simply because it was a closer shot! U sure u guys can't get some trestle shots?
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 10:30 PM
Whew, I'm not sure I see this the way everyone else does. I really like the composition of number 1 over number 2. Color saturation seems greater - in fact, if it had been film I would have guessed that a polarizer filter was used on number 1, where number 2 could have used a polariser. The color seems washed out to me on number 2, the sky full of haze or simply washed out. The deep BNSF orange contrasted by the yellow has more impact and strength in 1, and the composition is like the old RR art. However, number two does appear to be closer, which is a plus. Which one do you think an editor would choose for a cover/fullpage art or calendar page?
LSTRAINER
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
dave5000
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 10:51 PM
I chose photo #2, my reason was compostition. Photo 1 has the horizon in the middle of the frame, photo 2 the horizon is in the lower 3rd. A more pleasing framing to the eye. I do however like the color saturation of photo 1. I also appears that these two photos are from different locations, the sun and angle of the camera all have an effect on the photographic outcome. ** and hey E & M, I was just in Milwaukee (4/2) and found some great stuff in south Milwaukee ! caught a light run by UP and the Bucyrus Erie was moving around too ! I had no Idea it was really there !
d5k
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 5 2004 11:49 PM
I liked both pictures in various ways, although most voters chose #2, I picked #1. It offered the best profiles of the power, like the differences on the cabs of the first two units, ( the 1'st had the updated version of BNSF cigar band and the second unit did not ) . You couldn't miss the CSX unit at the rear of the lash-up either ! The side view also portrayed the trains movement much better to me than photo #2, as you could see the exhaust trail billowing off to the rear , ( they must 'nt have been moveing up-grade, or pulling hard at that moment, as the faint exhaust trail suggests ) the biggest problem was that the lens filter or adjustment was too dark, and it could have stood a little more of a zoom-up... The coolest thing aboult #2 to me is the effectual, awesome feeling, that a speeding train is comeing right at you !!! There is a theatrical movie-like quality to that kind of shot . It seems to stir people... EXELLENT JOB GUYS !!!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Apr 6 2004 12:21 AM
#2 gives a real feel of power. As I get older (along with my eyes) big seems to get better. A little more color saturation would be nice, but the photo can pass muster without it.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 5: April 5, 2004