Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
35
Replies — 9690 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 20 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 4 - March 22, 2004
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 4 - March 22, 2004
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Mar 24 2004 11:39 AM
I picked #1, it was close, but I like that I could see some of the side of the engine.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
JoeUmp
on
Thu, Mar 25 2004 5:22 AM
I liked photo number 1 better. It seems to me that it shows up better against its background than photo 2.
Joe
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
mikeyuhas
on
Thu, Mar 25 2004 11:29 AM
Hi all,
There's a great story in the Circuits section of today's New York Times that explains some of the features of digital SLRs, and makes comparisons with point n' shoot digitals.
It's at
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/25/technology/circuits/25stat.html
; you'll probably need to be registered on the nytimes.com website (free) to see it.
Thank you for reading
Trains
magazine!
click here
if you dare
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Mar 25 2004 8:57 PM
Any shot of a CP locomotive is a good shot!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Mar 26 2004 6:55 PM
i voted number two. there seems to be a theme going here one shot is always head on the other at the side. (both are awsome!)
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Mickhall
on
Fri, Mar 26 2004 7:08 PM
I voted for No. 2 because I liked the contrast and photo No. 1 had a tree growing out of it although it wasn't a bad photo. I'd love to see you guys do some shots with slow shutter speeds that show movement. It would be interesting to see what the Canon Digital can do under those circumstances.
I hear a train a-comin.....
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 4 - March 22, 2004