Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

how big is your layout ?

13305 views
107 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 31, 2004 10:35 PM
Well I polled under 18 x 24 but
my layout is 191 sq. feet
and still I look for ways to add to it
next house will have a 20 x 30 foot train room

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 664 posts
Posted by mustanggt on Friday, December 31, 2004 9:43 PM
My layout is in the garage and is 7x11 feet. I was originally going to build a 5x9 but then thought that would make the layout too crowded, especially with my amtrak trains.
C280 rollin'
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: SE Nebraska
  • 249 posts
Posted by camarokid on Friday, December 31, 2004 8:53 PM
Mine is shaped like a "P". 24' on the long leg and 16' x 12' on the rest. It would be so much better if I had all of the 24' x 16' room, but stairs and a doorway that can't be moved prevent this.
Archie
Ain't it great!!!
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Friday, December 31, 2004 8:44 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CBQ_Guy

QUOTE: Originally posted by leichner

It's not the size that counts, it's how you use it, no, it's how you build it, or, never mind, size is everything.


It's how you operate it...


Yeah, but you can get a helluva lot more operation on a larger layout, can't you?
Size seriously limits how and what you can run.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 31, 2004 8:27 PM
mine is a 49x61 and 2 decks high
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Northern Illinois
  • 248 posts
Posted by mecovey on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 5:47 PM
30X54
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 2:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by leichner

It's not the size that counts, it's how you use it, no, it's how you build it, or, never mind, size is everything.


It's how you operate it...
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Southeast U.S.A.
  • 851 posts
Posted by rexhea on Sunday, September 19, 2004 11:50 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by wmlurgan

My layout is 35x24. It is modeled after the WMRY Lurgan Branch in the 50-60s which ran through my town. Total miles is 30 miles and is detailed exactly as it was in that period. Thank heavens I was a kid in those days to be able to recall where what was along with a few photos of areas taken years before the rails were removed in my town. The last part of this railroad is being finished now (background). Actual photos printed, cut out and glued to the background board serve to finish off the scenery. I started out with a 20x24 years ago in the Pennsy line also in my town.

Good Luck to all you guys and your railroads....


Sounds like a great layout. Do you have pictures posted anywhere? I would sure like to see them.
REX
Rex "Blue Creek & Warrior Railways" http://www.railimages.com/gallery/rexheacock
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 19, 2004 11:03 AM
My layout is 35x24. It is modeled after the WMRY Lurgan Branch in the 50-60s which ran through my town. Total miles is 30 miles and is detailed exactly as it was in that period. Thank heavens I was a kid in those days to be able to recall where what was along with a few photos of areas taken years before the rails were removed in my town. The last part of this railroad is being finished now (background). Actual photos printed, cut out and glued to the background board serve to finish off the scenery. I started out with a 20x24 years ago in the Pennsy line also in my town.

Good Luck to all you guys and your railroads....
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Sunday, September 19, 2004 10:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by vsmith

8 feet by 20 feet

It too big AND too small.

At 8' x 20' it eats up a big part of a 20' x 20' garage, I can still get the car into it but its tight.

At G gauge, 1/2" scale, its WAY TOO SMALL. If you see the plan it looks like something from Carl Arnets Micro-Layout pages.

Basically its an oval with a small yard at each end, with access ailse's to reach switches and sidings. All the benchwork is done all the track is layed. but I'm still fighting the battle of space out there finding room for all the junk we seam to accumulate these days while accomodating the layout as well.


Since this was first written, the misses explained to me that she wanted to park her car IN the garage, Sooo... [V]

My layout is now only 8' x 10' [:0][:(!], now it really does look like a Micro-layout. I had to tear out half the bench work[:(], luckily no scenery was started yet. I was able to keep the main yard and was able to rework whats left into a loop with three sidings. [V][B)]

Sheesh, Am I have fun yet?[%-)]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Saturday, September 18, 2004 10:33 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AggroJones

QUOTE: Originally posted by SamIam89

Perhaps this thread would be more accurate if the poll would have been in square feet. THen every layout size is covered, since there are very few "rectangular" layouts once you pass 4x8. Such as:

1-32 sq ft
33-48 sq ft
49-64 sq ft
65-80 sq ft
81-100 sq ft
101-140 sq ft
141-165 sq ft
166-190 sqft



In that case, my layout would be only 46 sq ft. [:(]

Lately I've been thinking of ways to increase the travelling distance of my layout, while still allowing me and all my stuff to exist in the same small bedroom.

I wi***o design a layout that totals about 60 square feet of space and send around the walls. That means it will cut across the door.
I'm not a large man, so a duck under wouldn't be much a problem for me.

We'll see.


Update, my dawgs!

Incase you don't know, this layout is destroyed and I'm well in progress on my overall 11' x 11'.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: San Francisco Bay Area
  • 1,090 posts
Posted by on30francisco on Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:44 PM
I agree with GerFust. a better question would have been; "How many square feet is your layout?" Mine runs around the perimeter of the room. I have about 70 sq. ft.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 3:18 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SamIam89

Perhaps this thread would be more accurate if the poll would have been in square feet. THen every layout size is covered, since there are very few "rectangular" layouts once you pass 4x8. Such as:

1-32 sq ft
33-48 sq ft
49-64 sq ft
65-80 sq ft
81-100 sq ft
101-140 sq ft
141-165 sq ft
166-190 sqft



In that case, my layout would be only 46 sq ft. [:(]

Lately I've been thinking of ways to increase the travelling distance of my layout, while still allowing me and all my stuff to exist in the same small bedroom.

I wi***o design a layout that totals about 60 square feet of space and send around the walls. That means it will cut across the door.
I'm not a large man, so a duck under wouldn't be much a problem for me.

We'll see.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: New York
  • 214 posts
Posted by Chompers on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:53 PM
by the way this layout is in g scale. dose any one know about a cheep over head system? i am under 18 and the only plaace money comes from is a birthday .
The P.C.&.M.R.R SA#14
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: New York
  • 214 posts
Posted by Chompers on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:51 PM
i curently have a 8 by 10 railroad. my family is making me down size! dang 8 by 10 is very small when you have a bachmon engine that is supose to run on minimum of 10' diamiter. i use the lgb r 1, R2, G3, the minimum it will take is r2 and that there is 5 feet.
The P.C.&.M.R.R SA#14
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 760 posts
Posted by Roadtrp on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:48 PM
My layout is 3-1/2' x 7-1/2' - N scale.
-Jerry
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:22 PM
5x9, but I will expand as I get further in the hobby
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:16 PM
My layout will be built in a 9 x 10 foot room.

The room is currently being sheetrocked. The layout will take some inspiration from David Barrow's Domino system with some changes to fit my needs. The main layout will be a large oval with a switching yard, fishing dock, and other stuff. I have a space 5x4 that I can expand into and I am contemplating a second level in that space for logging. time will tell.

I plan to model the Union Pacific but haven't set a location. I am considering modeling the dalles, oregon as it is small and has some good features. I also would like to model Coos Bay, Oregon - where the UP has never run. ha go figure.. lifes little dilemnas!
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: CA
  • 170 posts
Posted by cp1057 on Sunday, December 21, 2003 9:23 PM
My layout has been downsized slightly to 61/2 x 13 ft, with a shelf extension of 1 x 6. This layout (under construction) is actually an improvement over the old one as it includes staging, mainline running and a branchline leading to a Timesave type switching setup. Using fiddle yard staging, this layout will support 6 trains per operating session.

Charles
Hillsburgh Ontario
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:28 PM
It's not the size that counts, it's how you use it, no, it's how you build it, or, never mind, size is everything.

Have a Merry Christmas
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:17 PM
My N layout is in a "study" - now the train room which is 9 1/2 by 13 1/2 feet. In it so far, I've built a double decked layout. A few years from now I will add a third deck under the current lower deck strictly to be used for staging. At first I was worried I couldn't have a decent size layout in this room, but I have my hands full since I do most of the building by myself.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 6:53 PM
Mine is 6X3. But I`m told this is good for n-scale. At least I`m up from 4X3. I have a lot going on includung two big and one small yard, a continuous loop mainline,(note I avoided the term "oval"), and trains ranging from general merchandise to coal to an intermodal train....It`s all in what you do with what you have.
And it still takes up half of my darn bedroom!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:43 PM
I took over my basement, my layout is 30'long x14 wide with wall to wall and walk around areas. My wife thinks im crazy but I tell her im not sitting in a bar all night.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:25 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by allaird

Can you believe it, mines too big! I live in a rural area and work on it mostly by myself. Most of my model railroad friends live 90 or so miles away and visit quarterly. My layout is 26x41 feet (1060 sq ft) walk in railroad with about 500 feet of main line run and 10 % is double decked. ( It still wasn't big enough to get eventhing in I wanted for operation.) The main line trackage for the lower deck got finished last weekend is wired and the DCC system is working nicely. Scenery is complete on about 15%. I've been working on average one day a week on it for about four years. It's way to easy to enter the train room at 9 am Saturday morning and not come up for air until dinner time. It loads of fun!

AL3

Geez...that sounds like a monster. BTW, what scale?
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:25 PM
I picked "other" as mine is 24 by 38 feet.
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, December 15, 2003 10:58 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by OLD DAD

I'm a glutton for punishment, "G" scale layout is 10'x62' with a 12'x12' ell under a deck.

HO standard gauge city style switching layout on two foot wide shelf along the walls of a 11'x7' room.

HOn30....."micro" layout 15"x48", still trying to get the little beggers to run better.

Gn15....."micro" layout (Savannah Waterfront) on Carl Arendt's "Micro Layouts for Model Railroads" site. http://www.carendt.com

OLD DAD



Hey OLD DAD, you and I have similar psychosis... I mean tastes!

I'm also doing two Micro layouts, an HOn30 thats 9" x 10" and a G gauge (yes, full G guage) layout based on one of Carl's "shoebox madness" layouts, "Cycles de Berlan", and Yes! its under the 4 sq foot rule!

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: France
  • 240 posts
Posted by ddechamp71 on Sunday, December 14, 2003 11:35 AM
-My small diorama: about 1 X 4 ft (no loop, trains are going back and forth)
-My future layout (I wish I start it in next january): walk-around 15 x 22 ft, walkaround style.
Both are Z scale.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 14, 2003 9:12 AM
Perhaps this thread would be more accurate if the poll would have been in square feet. THen every layout size is covered, since there are very few "rectangular" layouts once you pass 4x8. Such as:

1-32 sq ft
33-48 sq ft
49-64 sq ft
65-80 sq ft
81-100 sq ft
101-140 sq ft
141-165 sq ft
166-190 sqft

etc. I dont know what the variables would be, but you see my idea. [:)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 14, 2003 9:00 AM
I'm a glutton for punishment, "G" scale layout is 10'x62' with a 12'x12' ell under a deck.

HO standard gauge city style switching layout on two foot wide shelf along the walls of a 11'x7' room.

HOn30....."micro" layout 15"x48", still trying to get the little beggers to run better.

Gn15....."micro" layout (Savannah Waterfront) on Carl Arendt's "Micro Layouts for Model Railroads" site. http://www.carendt.com

OLD DAD
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 13, 2003 6:41 AM
mine fills most of a 12x18 room and has 3 levels with a continous run on the bottom with a long out and back on the upper levels.

jon

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!