Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Starting over

13074 views
97 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:25 AM
Currently use HO/HOn3 in a small switching layout, primarily due to time constraints but space constraints are a factor too. Also have a considerable amount of Lionel/O tinplate for Christmas displays and the like. Have been very tempted to try a high rail O tinplate/On30 combination layout but the sizes of reasonably scaled buildings is daunting. Shrinking the structures enough to fit the space and time results in too much carcicature and not enough realism for me - truly the only thing holding me back from switching. Advantages of switching would be easier on the eyes, space for DCC in the locomotives, and easier track work - I lay my own, except for the high rail where the Atlas track system is pretty darn realistic for tinplate!

Fred Wright
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: PRR Mainline
  • 118 posts
Posted by detting on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:02 PM
I think that S is the best size for trains, small enough to run a good size train, but big enough to superdetail. I'd be there if it weren't for my investment in HO!

Later...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:46 AM
I would switch to a largetr scale. HO is about as small as I can work with and not go insane handling the detail parts. But also doing a 1/24 scale Gauge III track garden line. If I were to start over, I would almsot exclusivly work in that scale.
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: US
  • 23 posts
Posted by deevs on Saturday, November 1, 2003 7:52 AM
I would switch to A garden railroad
Deevs Chief coffee drinker for the DETROIT-VASSAR-SAGINAW R R NARA member # 84
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 12 posts
Posted by 64ss283 on Saturday, November 1, 2003 2:08 PM
For me N Scale all the way, in CP, CN, BCR.




Brent
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 208 posts
Posted by preceng on Saturday, November 1, 2003 6:00 PM
Started in HO. Still there. I have often wondered if I had lots more space, would I want to move up (in size that is). I believe I would stay in HO, and just have lots more trains and routes.

Good question. What if money and space were not issues. What would we start out with?
Allan B.
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Milwaukee & Toronto
  • 929 posts
Posted by METRO on Sunday, November 2, 2003 1:22 AM
I'd still stick with HO scale. At the same time though I wouldn't mind a seccond N scale layout, maybe of the Japanese bullet trains that Kato has come out with.
  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 527 posts
Posted by eastcoast on Monday, November 3, 2003 9:20 AM
I had to start over every time I moved. I have started over so many times that my benchwork is recycled from the last layout. My current layout is now thankfully permanent(I bought a house to fit my layout) and has so many different styles I can't count. I mixed L-girder with butt joint and etc.,etc. I am happy with the results.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!