BMRR wrote: trainfan1221 wrote: It is very much a part of the real railroading scene. Its NOT part of my railroading scene. Stan.
trainfan1221 wrote: It is very much a part of the real railroading scene.
Its NOT part of my railroading scene.
Stan.
Mine either...
Tracklayer
I have some HO freight cars with graffiti on them, but it's tasteful and I put it on myself. I don't intend to sell them.
Now I did buy some of that mini construction equipment. The dozer can pass for a small HO scale dozer. As for the front end loader, backhoe and track hoe, I cut the cabs off them, reworked the drivers area and now they look like mredium-heavy equipment people rent to use in their yards.
Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running BearSpace Mouse for president!15 year veteran fire fighterCollector of Apple //e'sRunning Bear EnterprisesHistory Channel Club life member.beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam
You are lucky if you don't find them. The models are 1/130 scale, not N!
the cars are too large & heavy for N. they are diecast metal with a strange horn hook truck. WM sells them very cheap.
BTW they are in the same diecast section as the 1/144 scale tanks that are good for Nscale WW2 modelers. Nice M4 Sherman & Helcat tanks.
In the same section' look for the Norscot Mini Construction Cat equipment. Nice selection of Cat D5 dozer, 906 wheel loader, 420 backhoe & 315 excavator.
Have you seen this rapid transit set with snap together layouts?
crazy stuff including a graffitti version
art imitating life.
If these cars are supposed to be so hip and modern, then why did the company not make the investment in Post-1980 Locomotives and Freight cars for this set?
I know they want to make a quick dollar on old tooling, but printing the apparently "modern graffiti art" on pre-1960's style cars is a bit like the stiff and rotund old people trying to dance to modern hip-hop.
This is embarrassingly un-hip.
Andrew
Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer
Sombra wrote: There is a whole lot of stereotyping here. Let me ask you a question. Does Walmart sell guns both real and toy versions? The TOY train cars in question are a legitimate expression of graffiti art , last I check spray painting toy or model cars was legal - so how this deiscussion jumps to cries of vandalism and gang insignias is beyond me. Put another way - if these same artists are now able to receive compensation for painting toy items, t-shirts, murals, walls etc - How is that a bad thing? Would't this legitimate activity cut down on real vandalism by providing an alternative? It sounds like the artists here have clearly been identified - I can;t imagine that he would go down to the local yard and bomb a train. It seems to me that folks are reacting more to the art regardless if it is vandalism or not - this is also why you hear such negative connotations - some of which include the gang association. I don't think this product promotes any illegal behavior any more than the guns do.
There is a whole lot of stereotyping here. Let me ask you a question. Does Walmart sell guns both real and toy versions?
The TOY train cars in question are a legitimate expression of graffiti art , last I check spray painting toy or model cars was legal - so how this deiscussion jumps to cries of vandalism and gang insignias is beyond me. Put another way - if these same artists are now able to receive compensation for painting toy items, t-shirts, murals, walls etc - How is that a bad thing? Would't this legitimate activity cut down on real vandalism by providing an alternative? It sounds like the artists here have clearly been identified - I can;t imagine that he would go down to the local yard and bomb a train.
It seems to me that folks are reacting more to the art regardless if it is vandalism or not - this is also why you hear such negative connotations - some of which include the gang association.
I don't think this product promotes any illegal behavior any more than the guns do.
Andrew Falconer wrote: The September 2006 Issue of TRAINS has a thorough article on the graffiti problem and how it is being glamorized by some people. Pick us the September 2006 issue of TRAINS before it is gone. The October 2006 issue is already being mailed out to subscribers. Andrew
The September 2006 Issue of TRAINS has a thorough article on the graffiti problem and how it is being glamorized by some people.
Pick us the September 2006 issue of TRAINS before it is gone. The October 2006 issue is already being mailed out to subscribers.
There is a funny joke (or bad stereotype) on the page where they ask the question is it crime or art. There is a picture of "Bob Marley" - only problem is that the picture is actually of Wu-Tang Clan member Old Dirty Bastrrd (sp) - not only does the picture look nothing like Bob Marley (unless you think all.....) but the author apparently ignored the initials O D B next to the face ?????
zgardner18 wrote: Azure wrote:I dislike graffiti...i admit, once in a while some of it looks like art, instead of just trash. To the graffiti artists, the ones who do create those paintings from time to time that actually resemble art, couldnt they find a better (not to mention safer and LEGAL) means of expressing themselves? The rest of these(read:LESS TALENTED) "artists" need to go get jobs. And it really REALLY bothers me to see this sold in toy form, with a trading card of a graffiti "artist" sold at a wal-mart. Artistic talent aside, railcars and locomotives are 1)private property 2) insanely expensive and 3) insanely dangerous. I wonder how Wal-Mart would react if a rash of vandalism struck their stores and trucks? Think they would package and sell mini versions of that? When a child, inspired by his favorite "artist" is struck by a passing train in a busy yard, while trying to emulate something he saw on a trading card, who will be the responsible party? The people packaging this trash and pretending its a worthwhile part of our culture? Or the railroads, who did nothing more than try and operate just as they have for 150 years? Tresspassing is still the no 2 cause of railroad related death after crossing collisions. Maybe these companies should think before they package this stuff, trying to turn urban decay into a marketing angle. Im all for model trains being sold at wal marts. But lets sell model trains for the trains, not simply as a canvas for graffiti. Cant believe they included little trading cards....just blowing off steam, Azure Something that I would like to add is: how can Wal-mart promote this behavoir by selling these railcars but on the same hand they won't allow the sale of a CD with bad language. None of the above is better than the other. Maybe they should really evaluate their marketing and take a closer look at everything in general. I like the moral part about not supplying bad language CD's, but allowing this gaffiti car isn't any better to corrupt the minds on our youth. Sure, it's our part as parents to teach our children correct principles, but if Wal-mart is going to help us by not selling one bad thing then maybe they should help us by not allowing a boxcar promoting the art of gaffiti to provoke our youth to trespass and vandalize. But in the end, it is still our job to teach our youth right, and wrong, and let them govern for themselves. We can't protect them from everything, no matter how bad this world gets.
Azure wrote:I dislike graffiti...i admit, once in a while some of it looks like art, instead of just trash. To the graffiti artists, the ones who do create those paintings from time to time that actually resemble art, couldnt they find a better (not to mention safer and LEGAL) means of expressing themselves? The rest of these(read:LESS TALENTED) "artists" need to go get jobs. And it really REALLY bothers me to see this sold in toy form, with a trading card of a graffiti "artist" sold at a wal-mart. Artistic talent aside, railcars and locomotives are 1)private property 2) insanely expensive and 3) insanely dangerous. I wonder how Wal-Mart would react if a rash of vandalism struck their stores and trucks? Think they would package and sell mini versions of that? When a child, inspired by his favorite "artist" is struck by a passing train in a busy yard, while trying to emulate something he saw on a trading card, who will be the responsible party? The people packaging this trash and pretending its a worthwhile part of our culture? Or the railroads, who did nothing more than try and operate just as they have for 150 years? Tresspassing is still the no 2 cause of railroad related death after crossing collisions. Maybe these companies should think before they package this stuff, trying to turn urban decay into a marketing angle. Im all for model trains being sold at wal marts. But lets sell model trains for the trains, not simply as a canvas for graffiti. Cant believe they included little trading cards....just blowing off steam, Azure
Something that I would like to add is: how can Wal-mart promote this behavoir by selling these railcars but on the same hand they won't allow the sale of a CD with bad language. None of the above is better than the other. Maybe they should really evaluate their marketing and take a closer look at everything in general. I like the moral part about not supplying bad language CD's, but allowing this gaffiti car isn't any better to corrupt the minds on our youth. Sure, it's our part as parents to teach our children correct principles, but if Wal-mart is going to help us by not selling one bad thing then maybe they should help us by not allowing a boxcar promoting the art of gaffiti to provoke our youth to trespass and vandalize. But in the end, it is still our job to teach our youth right, and wrong, and let them govern for themselves. We can't protect them from everything, no matter how bad this world gets.
Wal-Mart is out to make a buck and that's it. Look around you the next time you're in Wal-Mart and you'll notice that the people are the same ones you see on The Gerry Springer Show trying to figure out who of 5 guys might have fathered their child. You'll also notice that there isn't a toy in the store that offers any kind of a learning experience. It's all "shoot-um-up" and junk, again, catering to the Jerry Springer crowd. I guess it's fitting that the rolling stock is covered with crap....it's what the Jerry Springer crowd is used to.
Mondo
These "ENAMALIZED" cars are add ons to the existing train sets.
How long ago were original sets sold?
Here are links to information about this line of scale train cars and locomotives.
Maisto Diecast "On Track" 1/131 Trains
1/131 Scale "On Track" Diecast toy trains (Maisto)
1/131 Scale Trains - a Technical Look
1/131 Scale Trains - Comparisons with TT Scale and Scale Model Railroading
1/131 Scale Trains - Test Runs
1/131 Scale Trains - Track plans and Layouts for the "On Track" track system
The origin of these "TT" Scale freight cars makes one wonder where do they keep all these injection molds and printing masks and screens. Some people really do hold onto all the old parts for future use. The tooling to make and paint these cars has to be at least 20 to 30 years old. It is obvious that not a cent was spent to make new tooling. All the new expenses on this graffiti promotion project went to the screen printing of the graffitti and the lithography of the package. This is the least expensive way to promote graffitti vandalizing on railroad equipment. If they were to actually be prototypical about the railroad side of the product, the cars would be from the 1980's not the 1950's or 1960's.
I bought my son some their stuff for his last birthday. He has a geep (I believe a 38), boxcar, tank car, caboose and I believe a gon. The also released some passenger equipment at one time. I believe ARR was one of the roads, and there were a couple others. The horn hook couplers are interesting on N scale.
Edit: They weren't the vandalized cars either. I don't think I would buy him something like that.
The whole idea of promoting gang-related crime makes my skin crawl, most graffiti is gang related and has some connection to gangs. You see it everywhere and in the part of the country where I am, SW New Mexico it is all over the place and on RR cars.
I was shocked to see WM have this products on the shelves and it appears to me the idea is to appeal to the younger generation with graffiti as an art form, it's totally beyond me why they do it. The posting about the use of chemical cars is scary indeed as people that tag RR cars most likely can't read the warnings or ignore them. How about liquid nitrogen for starters, it will instantly freeze whatever extremity it gets on, and then that part will shatter. The Hazmat warnings are on the cars but it is oblivious to marketing for WM that safety be an issue.
John Staehle
p.s. has anyone here written to WM ? I'm about to!
--Zak Gardner
My Layout Blog: http://mrl369dude.blogspot.com
http://zgardner18.rrpicturearchives.net
VIEW SLIDE SHOW: CLICK ON PHOTO BELOW
Azure hit the spike on the head !! Why is it that people (marketers) would laud a destructrive practice like
vandalism and couple it with a toy targetted at children ? Insane.
Cascade Green Forever ! GET RICH QUICK !! Count your Blessings.
I understand that it’s actually closer to ‘TT’ scale.
Graffiti does seem to be all over the place these days, but I choose not to model it. It may be prototypical to model, but I’m really not interested in giving it any more attention than it already gets. It’s vandalism, and while not considered a serious crime, it is a ridiculous blight that we could do without.
I do find it disconcerting that this would become the centerpiece of a toy. The narrative on the second picture alone seems like an attempt to indoctrinate kids to graffiti – calling it ‘art’ being lost as each new coat of paint erased it (instead of vandalism of private property). What’s next? Graffiti on toy cars and trucks?
THE SOUTHERN SERVES THE SOUTH.