John
spidge wrote:On point # 2, even though you have to enter the short address you don't have to activate it. Then you can go forward and program the long address, and activate it without concern for confusing the consist numbering.
Problem # 1
Yes, in DCC forward is programed when you do the initial setup on the decoder.
Problem 2: Still confused
On my layout I generally cancel a consist if not in use. This takes away the problem of the system grabing both units when you call one of the locos to use independantly.
Problem # 3,
Its better to not even try.Just cancell the consist comlettely before using the units indipendently.
problem # 4.
I have this problem to. I just dial the loco I want and its behind me the rest of the time, but yes it is a bit anoying.
Problrm #5,
Eliminate all possibilities then you can go forward and not thinl about what you may have done wrong weeks or days ago.
Problem #6,
Sorry, I don't have any sound yet.Maybe Christmas.
There are so many CV possibilities it could drive you nuts. The best case senario is to have computor programing but powercab does not have the capability yet. You may go a bit nuts breaking them all down but key in on those that are important to you and it will reduce the meny changes everytime there is a problem.
P>S> Its good to see you are hanging in there.
Gumby4 wrote:Problem 1: Now forward is forward and reverse is reverse. No idea why the change. I think it has something to do with consists but I don't know yet. There are no arrows on the display. You get FWD and REV. I get the feeling this is not like a DC controller where direction is based on the wiring and engine position.
Problem 3: I am really going to have to play with consists on the system. I don't know if you can use the engines separately once they have been assigned to a consist. Right now I don't have the time to mess with this so consist are off limits until we can spend an afternoon playing around with them.
Pondini wrote:It sounds to me like you need to spend some time with the manual that came with your system. Take one thing at a time, though: trying to figure out all this stuff can get very involved and confusing. The manual that came with my PowerHousePro system is very complete, well-explained, and usable, so I'd guess the one you have is similar.
I would suggest that until you master the art of programming and running a single locomotive proficiently, you should refrain from trying to do advanced features such as multiple loco consists. If you are finding the manual difficult to understand, take the advice of those here that are knowledgeable and call Tony's to ask them for their help in resolving your issues.
Prior to this past Thursday, I had absolutely no exposure to DCC other than what I've read here on this forum. I went to a friend's house and used his NCE system to program the long address into my new Tower 55 locomotives I just purchased. I glanced at the manual regarding programming on the program track, followed the screens and was able to program both locomotives with their respective road numbers. I was then able to program the two of them into a consist with no trouble. If I can do this, anybody should be able to do so.
I would strongly recommend that you program on the programming track and not the mainline. Some locomotives are just a little fussy about programming on the main.
Blasting the manufacturer of a DCC system because you can't instantly run consists, etc is a cheap shot in my opinion and could unduly influence people who have yet to decide on a DCC system to purchase. At the very least, you should alter your thread title to a more appropriate reflection of the issue you are experiencing.
Off
Don Z.
Research; it's not just for geeks.
Gumby4 wrote:Ok, now for some updates. I didn't get much of a chance to work on all your suggestions do to some other family issues. But here it what happened today.Problem 1: Now forward is forward and reverse is reverse. No idea why the change. I think it has something to do with consists but I don't know yet. There are no arrows on the display. You get FWD and REV. I get the feeling this is not like a DC controller where direction is based on the wiring and engine position.
Problem 4: Still getting loco numbers that I've never entered.
Problem 5: Somehow doing an universal reset maybe in order before I start adding new locos.
Problem 6: I need time to play with this more. I'm getting partial shutdowns but still can't get the engines to "tuen off"
As for the CV stuff, didn't have time today. Will try next week. On the road again tomorrow.Thanks for all your help and input.
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
James, Brisbane Australia
Modelling AT&SF in the 90s
bigiron wrote:Actually Ill go Digitrax. Much better product.
https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling
Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.
Tom,
Let me rephrase that.... "I'll go with Digitrax..... the competitor." I should have known better than to add the part about the "better product." Someday I'll learn to think before I type.
(3:16)
Don Z wrote:Blasting the manufacturer of a DCC system because you can't instantly run consists, etc is a cheap shot in my opinion and could unduly influence people who have yet to decide on a DCC system to purchase. At the very least, you should alter your thread title to a more appropriate reflection of the issue you are experiencing.Don Z.
I bought my NCE Procab about 2 months ago and I am very impressed with the system and the support.
When I first got started, I spent about 2 hours on the phone over 3 calls with their tech having things explained to me. He seemed genuinely happy to help a dummie like me get the system up and running. I called on a wednesday and a friday and was talking to human being by the third ring.
As far as digitrax goes, it's ok, but I find it a bit clunky to operate and NCE's expandabillity is superior.
I think a lot of people forget this technology is not like a simple DC powerpack. It's a lot more like setting up a new computer system, (which is of course exactly what it is), there almost always some glitches when you first set one up, but they do get worked out. And DCC technology is only in its adolesence so far.
As far as outrageous prices go, have you seen what they're charging for palm devices and laptops these days? I spent $500 on my computer originally, but now after upgrades and additional storage devices, I'm well over $2000. The same goes for DCC, the cost all depends on what "bells and whistles" you get (pun intended).
Jay
C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1
Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums
modelmaker51 wrote: As far as digitrax goes, it's ok, but I find it a bit clunky to operate and NCE's expandabillity is superior.
I think you will find a lot of Digitrax users disagree with your statement that expandability with NCE is superior. Expandability is one of the strong suits of Digitrax. Digitrax has one of the largest ranges of DCC add-ons including signalling systems. A basic Zephyr starter set can have any and all of the Digitrax add-ons functioning as an integrated system. I have already added a 5 amp booster for more power, a PC interface, wireless control and 3 extra DCC throttles as well as 2 old analog DC packs to provide additional control. I am curious in what way NCE expandability is superior?
Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum
james saunders wrote:Oh man that's too bad, I was actually considering NCE if I converted to DCC.I hope you can get it all sorted out soon!
I would hope that you would take this incident in context of the bigger picture. I guarantee you there are people that will have "horror" stories about every system out there. I've decided to go NCE when I upgrade to DCC in the next year and this has not changed my opinion. I don't expect to have everything perfect right out of the box. There is a learning curve for me. While I understand Gumby's frustration with the support, that in itself does not change my decision to go NCE.
bigiron wrote:Tom, Let me rephrase that.... "I'll go with Digitrax..... the competitor." I should have known better than to add the part about the "better product." Someday I'll learn to think before I type. (3:16)
Gumby4 wrote:The technical issues being discussed here are not the reason for my upset with NCE. The discussion is happening because people here are doing what NCE should have been doing.Maybe if you read the first post, you would know I'm blasting NCE because of the lack of customer support. This support is suppose to be one of their big reason to buy their system. Bigiron nailed the issue in a nutshell. And whether it is a big company or small, sexist, racist or any other such comment is NEVER appropriate.
simon1966 wrote: modelmaker51 wrote: As far as digitrax goes, it's ok, but I find it a bit clunky to operate and NCE's expandabillity is superior. I think you will find a lot of Digitrax users disagree with your statement that expandability with NCE is superior. Expandability is one of the strong suits of Digitrax. Digitrax has one of the largest ranges of DCC add-ons including signalling systems. A basic Zephyr starter set can have any and all of the Digitrax add-ons functioning as an integrated system. I have already added a 5 amp booster for more power, a PC interface, wireless control and 3 extra DCC throttles as well as 2 old analog DC packs to provide additional control. I am curious in what way NCE expandability is superior?
That is one reason I purchased the Chief, all that is present without having to expand a smaller system with more money.
But, I may purchase the Zephyr later for a switching yard and connect THAT to the loconet easily as a seperate power district.
Apologies to others for a cross thread post. I try to avoid those.
Strange. I've had a NCE system for years. No problems (other than what I created myself) and support has been nothing short of top notch.
Larry
http://www.youtube.com/user/ClinchValleySD40
http://www.flickr.com/photos/52481330@N05/
http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php/cat/500/page/1/ppuser/8745/sl/c
clinchvalley wrote: Strange. I've had a NCE system for years. No problems (other than what I created myself) and support has been nothing short of top notch.
I like you reply. Many of the problems we get into are ones we created. The DCC installations can bring up some capacitance problems in layouts if everything is not correct and many other factors can add to problems. We do need help sometimes and that is the issue for this post if I understand it correctly.
I normally do not get technical support any moment of the day or week and even had to wait a day or so for some of my requests.
This problem could have happened with any system and probably any technical support group. They are all human and are small time compared to GM or Ford which are both almost bankrupt.
I pray every day I break even, Cause I can really use the money!
I started with nothing and still have most of it left!
All sorts of intersting comments here, isn't there?
I've had occasion to call and talk to NCE about problems, or just with questions, and they were very helpful.
simon1966 wrote: I think you will find a lot of Digitrax users disagree with your statement that expandability with NCE is superior. Expandability is one of the strong suits of Digitrax. Digitrax has one of the largest ranges of DCC add-ons including signalling systems. A basic Zephyr starter set can have any and all of the Digitrax add-ons functioning as an integrated system. I have already added a 5 amp booster for more power, a PC interface, wireless control and 3 extra DCC throttles as well as 2 old analog DC packs to provide additional control. I am curious in what way NCE expandability is superior?
There certainly is one way in which Digitrax expandability is superior to NCE - adding a PC interface. NCE doesn't have an expansion unit for a PC Interface - the Power Pro has the interface built in. How short-sighted of NCE to do that! (To save on initial cost, the NCE Entry Level unit does NOT have a PCE interface).
Mark P.
Website: http://www.thecbandqinwyoming.comVideos: https://www.youtube.com/user/mabrunton
Brunton wrote:There certainly is one way in which Digitrax expandability is superior to NCE - adding a PC interface. NC[E} doesn't have an expansion unit for a PC Interface - the Power Pro has the interface built in. How short-sighted of NCE to do that! (To save on initial cost, the NCE Entry Level unit does NOT have a PCE interface).
Mark,
You are correct and I would agree. NCE is working on a USB port interface for the Power Cab. But, as Joe pointed out, they usually run behind schedule has far as getting things out the door. Along with the Smart Booster, that is one feature than I am eager for them to release.
Brunton wrote: There certainly is one way in which Digitrax expandability is superior to NCE - adding a PC interface. NCR doesn't have an expansion unit for a PC Interface - the Power Pro has the interface built in. How short-sighted of NCE to do that! (To save on initial cost, the NCE Entry Level unit does NOT have a PCE interface).
There certainly is one way in which Digitrax expandability is superior to NCE - adding a PC interface. NCR doesn't have an expansion unit for a PC Interface - the Power Pro has the interface built in. How short-sighted of NCE to do that! (To save on initial cost, the NCE Entry Level unit does NOT have a PCE interface).
Of course, it should be noted that the Zephyr does not have a built in PC interface either and that the Digitrax PC interface option was quite poor. Fortunately there are several companies making Digitrax Loconet compatible hardware like the Locobuffer so a Digitrax user is not reliant on Digitrax for all the hardware.
tstage wrote: bigiron wrote:Actually Ill go Digitrax. Much better product.Bigiron, Which DCC system you choose is your prerogative. And determining which one is the best fit for both you and your needs is wise shopping and how you ought to approach any purchase. But to say that (any brand) is a far superior product? Sorry, no. In my opinion, that statement is just totally off base...Tom