Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

MU question

1531 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
MU question
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:32 PM
when running in multiple unit, can electric and desil locomotives be put together? i doubt they can, because ive never seen this happen. if they cant, why not?
Thanks
just curious.
GEARHEAD426

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Almost Heaven...West Virginia
  • 793 posts
Posted by beegle55 on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:41 PM
I've never seen it, and although it might be able to be done on certain types, I doubt they have ever considered. But most electric trains have different track types then deisel locos, so who knows.
Head of operations at the Bald Mountain Railroad, a proud division of CSXT since 2002!
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Rochelle Hills. Where the dear and antelope play.
  • 527 posts
Posted by Master of Big Sky Blue on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:41 PM

Actually Yes they can.

The Milwaukee Road used both Diesel and Electric Locomotives in MU operations on their electrfied lines. The way I understand how it was set up though, that if the Electrics and the Diesels were MUed, the electrics had to be the lead locos because of the way they were wired up to run with the diesles.

Now for other electrfied roads I can not say. But at least the Milwuakee did things that way.

James

"Well, I've sort of commited my self here, so you pop that clowns neck, I will shoot his buddy, and I will probably have to shoot the bartender too." ----- William Adama upon meeting Saul Tigh Building an All Steam Roster from Old Tyco-Mantua, and Bowser kits. Free Drinks in the Dome Car
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Almost Heaven...West Virginia
  • 793 posts
Posted by beegle55 on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:42 PM
Weird. Oh well, if it works, it works.

-beegle55
Head of operations at the Bald Mountain Railroad, a proud division of CSXT since 2002!
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 2,742 posts
Posted by Dave Vollmer on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:32 PM

I'm fairly sure the OTHER big electric railroad in the US, the Pennsylvania, did NOT MU electric and diesel.  If they were matched together for any reason they typically had seperate crews.  Oft times steam was used in helper service under PRR wires between Parkesburg and Thorndale in eastern PA, but by the diesel era there were plenty of freight-geared GG1s and P5as to go around such that all-electric head-end power was the norm.  For a brief period, PRR used 7 ex-Milwaukee Road 2-C-C-2 electrics as helpers after the L1s 2-8-2s were scrapped, but their 35-mph gearing was unacceptable for the high-speed Philadelphia Division.  They were classed FF2, and were scrapped in 1960.  By the early 1960s, Pennsy began taking delivery of E44s for freight service.  Diesel trains under the wires were not all that uncommon (especially on local freights), but I can't say I've ever come across evidence of diesel and electrics actually MU'ed on PRR.

Why not?  PRR developed its own MU system for use with its early electrics in the very early 1930s, before there was a standard MU setup for diesels.  Remember too that many first-generation diesels wouldn't MU across manufacturers (i.e., Baldwin used a pneumatic system versus electric for EMD, etc.).

Modeling the Rio Grande Southern First District circa 1938-1946 in HOn3.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:36 PM
Not only could PRR motors not mu with diesels they could only mu with their own kind.  So you would never see a G with a P5a as an example with the exception of the EL2a and EL3a experimentals which could also mate with P5's.  It should also be noted that in teh eqarly years there was no standard and engines from different manufacturers could not mu.  Baldwin used a pneumatic control method.  EMD and Alco couldn;t either until things settled out.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 2:36 PM
 They can't MU in the sense that one engineer can control all the locos, but they certainly can doublehead like steam locos with each loco having its own crew.

                                       --Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Kansas
  • 808 posts
Posted by jamnest on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 2:48 PM

YES I have seen it done.  I rode the Pennsy from Phily to Chicago in 1966. Electrics were attached to the front of our train and cut off once we were over the mountains.  The dissels took us the rest of the way to Chicago.

JIM

Jim, Modeling the Kansas City Southern Lines in HO scale.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 2,742 posts
Posted by Dave Vollmer on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 2:59 PM
 jamnest wrote:

YES I have seen it done.  I rode the Pennsy from Phily to Chicago in 1966. Electrics were attached to the front of our train and cut off once we were over the mountains.  The dissels took us the rest of the way to Chicago.

JIM

Really?  Pennsy electric service never extended past Harrisburg, which is east of the mountains.  The change from electric to diesel was done there at Harrisburg station.  It was always a one-for-one swap (no cut-offs, but a full locomotive exchange).  Since the passenger diesel service facility was in Harrisburg and all of its westbound passenger crews were based there, I'm very surprised you'd have had a diesel on the head end of your train from Philadelphia.  There is plenty of literature and documentation (as well as a series of articles in Railmodel Journal and the Keystone, the publication of the PRRT&HS about Harrisburg operations and te electric to steam/diesel exchange) on this locomotive exchange.  The catenary ends just north of the Harrisburg yard, and in PRR/PC days also at the Enola electric motor pit, still technically part of the Philadelphia Division.  The mountains begin in the Middle Division and the major mountain grades on the Pittsburgh Division.

Modeling the Rio Grande Southern First District circa 1938-1946 in HOn3.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:52 PM
 Master of Big Sky Blue wrote:

Actually Yes they can.

The Milwaukee Road used both Diesel and Electric Locomotives in MU operations on their electrfied lines. The way I understand how it was set up though, that if the Electrics and the Diesels were MUed, the electrics had to be the lead locos because of the way they were wired up to run with the diesles.

Now for other electrfied roads I can not say. But at least the Milwuakee did things that way.

James




The MILW's Chief Electrical guy rigged up a rack and offset gear that was connected to the existing throttle in the electrics.  A pin connected the diesel control box and the electric throttle, but could be disconnected,  so the diesels  could be operated separately.  This system came about in 1957.  At first, it was 1 GP9 behind 2 Little Joes, to help through where the overhead was far between substations.  Later, the Joes were the helpers on 2-3 SD40-2s.  Helped keep the diesels wound up so they would pull more, rather than making transition and putting along.

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Rochelle Hills. Where the dear and antelope play.
  • 527 posts
Posted by Master of Big Sky Blue on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 7:10 PM

Thanks for filling me in with the details.

James

"Well, I've sort of commited my self here, so you pop that clowns neck, I will shoot his buddy, and I will probably have to shoot the bartender too." ----- William Adama upon meeting Saul Tigh Building an All Steam Roster from Old Tyco-Mantua, and Bowser kits. Free Drinks in the Dome Car
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 2,899 posts
Posted by Paul3 on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 7:31 PM

I dunno if it was possible to MU New Haven electrics to diesels, but they did, on occasion, run them together with most likely two crews.  In fact, the calendar this month for the NHRHTA shows a pair of EF-4's (ex-Virginians) behind, IIRC, a GP9, RS-11, and H16-44 (gotta love the NH's loco roster, eh?).

The reason?  At certain spots along the Shore Line in the 1960's, the voltage drop got so bad that they had to send out helpers for the electric freights to get them through the low voltage area (hey, the NH last made a profit in 1957...by the late 60's it was a miracle they were running at all).

It still wasn't a "normal" thing to do on the NH.

Paul A. Cutler III
*************
Weather Or No Go New Haven
*************

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Kansas
  • 808 posts
Posted by jamnest on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 7:56 PM
 Dave Vollmer wrote:
 jamnest wrote:

YES I have seen it done.  I rode the Pennsy from Phily to Chicago in 1966. Electrics were attached to the front of our train and cut off once we were over the mountains.  The dissels took us the rest of the way to Chicago.

JIM

Really?  Pennsy electric service never extended past Harrisburg, which is east of the mountains.  The change from electric to diesel was done there at Harrisburg station.  It was always a one-for-one swap (no cut-offs, but a full locomotive exchange).  Since the passenger diesel service facility was in Harrisburg and all of its westbound passenger crews were based there, I'm very surprised you'd have had a diesel on the head end of your train from Philadelphia.  There is plenty of literature and documentation (as well as a series of articles in Railmodel Journal and the Keystone, the publication of the PRRT&HS about Harrisburg operations and te electric to steam/diesel exchange) on this locomotive exchange.  The catenary ends just north of the Harrisburg yard, and in PRR/PC days also at the Enola electric motor pit, still technically part of the Philadelphia Division.  The mountains begin in the Middle Division and the major mountain grades on the Pittsburgh Division.

Yes, it was Harrisburg. (Hey I lived in Kansas prior to my family moving to PA and your hills looked like mountains to me.) The electrics were in front of the dissels and cut out at Harrisburg. They also cut in a dinning car for our dinner.  I remember that our train was delayed quite a bit in Harrisburg because of equipment problems.  We were looking forward to horseshoe curve, but because of the equipment delay in Harrisburg we did not get to horseshoe curve until after sun down.  The dissels may have been deadheading in the passenger consist and not used for power, but they were there.  It was a boy scout contignet of 25 troops traveling to Philmont Scout Ranch in New Mexico.  The last ten cars (chair cars) in the train were all boy scouts.  We changed trains in Chicago and rode the Denver Zepher to Denver, then by bus to Philmont.

JIM

Jim, Modeling the Kansas City Southern Lines in HO scale.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: S.E. Adirondacks, NY
  • 3,246 posts
Posted by modelmaker51 on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 8:55 PM
I have also seen photos of BC Rail mixed lashups, also with the electric in the lead.

Jay 

C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1 

Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 2,742 posts
Posted by Dave Vollmer on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 9:34 PM
 jamnest wrote:
 Dave Vollmer wrote:
 jamnest wrote:

YES I have seen it done.  I rode the Pennsy from Phily to Chicago in 1966. Electrics were attached to the front of our train and cut off once we were over the mountains.  The dissels took us the rest of the way to Chicago.

JIM

Really?  Pennsy electric service never extended past Harrisburg, which is east of the mountains.  The change from electric to diesel was done there at Harrisburg station.  It was always a one-for-one swap (no cut-offs, but a full locomotive exchange).  Since the passenger diesel service facility was in Harrisburg and all of its westbound passenger crews were based there, I'm very surprised you'd have had a diesel on the head end of your train from Philadelphia.  There is plenty of literature and documentation (as well as a series of articles in Railmodel Journal and the Keystone, the publication of the PRRT&HS about Harrisburg operations and te electric to steam/diesel exchange) on this locomotive exchange.  The catenary ends just north of the Harrisburg yard, and in PRR/PC days also at the Enola electric motor pit, still technically part of the Philadelphia Division.  The mountains begin in the Middle Division and the major mountain grades on the Pittsburgh Division.

Yes, it was Harrisburg. (Hey I lived in Kansas prior to my family moving to PA and your hills looked like mountains to me.) The electrics were in front of the dissels and cut out at Harrisburg. They also cut in a dinning car for our dinner.  I remember that our train was delayed quite a bit in Harrisburg because of equipment problems.  We were looking forward to horseshoe curve, but because of the equipment delay in Harrisburg we did not get to horseshoe curve until after sun down.  The dissels may have been deadheading in the passenger consist and not used for power, but they were there.  It was a boy scout contignet of 25 troops traveling to Philmont Scout Ranch in New Mexico.  The last ten cars (chair cars) in the train were all boy scouts.  We changed trains in Chicago and rode the Denver Zepher to Denver, then by bus to Philmont.

JIM

Cool!  Once again, it just goes to show that the railroads did not always abide by their own general rules.  Like they say, there's a prototype for everything!

Modeling the Rio Grande Southern First District circa 1938-1946 in HOn3.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Whitby, ON
  • 2,594 posts
Posted by CP5415 on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:37 AM

I think the only way locomotives couldn't be MU'd would be dependant on the type of control system.

Most diesel loco's were electrical controlled, where a Baldwin "Shark" was hydraulic.

I was reading about the D&H and the Sharks they had couldn't be MU'd with other locomotives for this reason.

Gordon

Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!

 K1a - all the way

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 7:17 AM
Baldwin's throttles were pneumatic, not hydraulic.

As for MUing diesels and electrics, it was common practice on the railway I work for - 85 and 86 class electric locos were designed from the outset to be MU compatible with our diesels.

http://www.railpage.org.au/pix/diesel/8021-8011-8609-8612-8614_CA16_Waterfall_8-7-99.jpg

The three trailing units are 86 class locos, on line and in MU without a separate crew.

Mark.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:03 AM
im alwayse blown away by the amount of knowledge here. antwayse, what about amtrak locomotives?
thanks
GEARHEAD426

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!