Monster locomotive

[jimmac230]

Definiately Challenger. been up close with Union Pacific #3985 and was simply in total awe of the locomotive. Have also been close to Centennial #6936 also was impressed with it too. Will possibly be purchasing one of each of them when possible in the future when layout gets made.

[jimmac230]

Definiately Challenger. been up close with Union Pacific #3985 and was simply in total awe of the locomotive. Have also been close to Centennial #6936 also was impressed with it too. Will possibly be purchasing one of each of them when possible in the future when layout gets made.

[Anonymous]

Not really large...but how about the other "Kruass Maffie" (spelling) the hood unit in Ho? Yes I know there was a brass version, but come on, not all of us can afford the brass...........Blank or with a road name.......oh also that runs well......

[Anonymous]

Not really large...but how about the other "Kruass Maffie" (spelling) the hood unit in Ho? Yes I know there was a brass version, but come on, not all of us can afford the brass...........Blank or with a road name.......oh also that runs well......

[ellisjamesrobertson]

I'd go for a GN artic and/or a CP Selkirk - both have been done in brass but a good plastic one would be great.

Ellis

Worcester. Eng.

[ellisjamesrobertson]

I'd go for a GN artic and/or a CP Selkirk - both have been done in brass but a good plastic one would be great.

Ellis

Worcester. Eng.

[Anonymous]

None of the above. I would like to see QUALITY 4-4-0's and 2-6-0's. A non-UP Challenger would be nice. In the last two years we got a high quality 2-8-8-2 and 2-6-6-6 in HO with a promise of a 2-6-6-2 within a year. The big locos have been coming but there is much to be desired at the low end of the spectrum.

[Anonymous]

None of the above. I would like to see QUALITY 4-4-0's and 2-6-0's. A non-UP Challenger would be nice. In the last two years we got a high quality 2-8-8-2 and 2-6-6-6 in HO with a promise of a 2-6-6-2 within a year. The big locos have been coming but there is much to be desired at the low end of the spectrum.

[Anonymous]

Why buy anything with a UP logo? I say boycott UP models until UP backs off on their ridiculous licensing demands! That might apply to the fallen flags as well.

[Anonymous]

Why buy anything with a UP logo? I say boycott UP models until UP backs off on their ridiculous licensing demands! That might apply to the fallen flags as well.

[the-big-blow]

From what I am told both BNSF and UP are doing licensing on using their name.

[the-big-blow]

From what I am told both BNSF and UP are doing licensing on using their name.

[ndbprr]

Your Polls do the hobby a severe injustice. By not allowing people to vote for what they want you can conclude that there is a demand for a product that doesn't exist. Marketing polls are extremely complex to avoid leading the consumer. At least put an "Other" category in them.

[ndbprr]

Your Polls do the hobby a severe injustice. By not allowing people to vote for what they want you can conclude that there is a demand for a product that doesn't exist. Marketing polls are extremely complex to avoid leading the consumer. At least put an "Other" category in them.

[ralphb]

I voted for the GG1 of which I have two in N scale, but I go ape when I see a J1. The Jays may be too big for my layout, but should be at home on my NTrak club's layout which has better curves.
An M1 may not be as much of a monster, but I woudn't mind one of them too.

[ralphb]

I voted for the GG1 of which I have two in N scale, but I go ape when I see a J1. The Jays may be too big for my layout, but should be at home on my NTrak club's layout which has better curves.
An M1 may not be as much of a monster, but I woudn't mind one of them too.

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by ndbprr

Your Polls do the hobby a severe injustice. By not allowing people to vote for what they want you can conclude that there is a demand for a product that doesn't exist. Marketing polls are extremely complex to avoid leading the consumer. At least put an "Other" category in them.

This wasn't meant to be a multiple choice examination - merely a poll. Obviously, if there were as many categories as there were railroads, fallen flags or current, there wouldn't be any chance to figure out where to vote.

I don't see where you were not (or were compelled) to vote for any of the ones offered. Seems to me that you were content in pointing a finger instead of adding your own category. I'm sure the editors wouldn't be so high-handed as to say your choice was outside the boundaries of the poll.

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by ndbprr

Your Polls do the hobby a severe injustice. By not allowing people to vote for what they want you can conclude that there is a demand for a product that doesn't exist. Marketing polls are extremely complex to avoid leading the consumer. At least put an "Other" category in them.

This wasn't meant to be a multiple choice examination - merely a poll. Obviously, if there were as many categories as there were railroads, fallen flags or current, there wouldn't be any chance to figure out where to vote.

I don't see where you were not (or were compelled) to vote for any of the ones offered. Seems to me that you were content in pointing a finger instead of adding your own category. I'm sure the editors wouldn't be so high-handed as to say your choice was outside the boundaries of the poll.

[Anonymous]

Sorry guys, none of the above also. I am a B&O fan. As you probably would guess, either EL3 - 5 or EM1 would be the locos of choice. One could also make a case for S1a's. (for those not of the "domer" persuasion, 2-8-8-0, 2-8-8-4, and 2-10-2)
paul m

[Anonymous]

Sorry guys, none of the above also. I am a B&O fan. As you probably would guess, either EL3 - 5 or EM1 would be the locos of choice. One could also make a case for S1a's. (for those not of the "domer" persuasion, 2-8-8-0, 2-8-8-4, and 2-10-2)
paul m

[lucas4449]

i would prefer a dd35. sp and up had them

[lucas4449]

i would prefer a dd35. sp and up had them

[Anonymous]

I put my 2 cents in for the Challenger,but really would want a SD 70M.In N scale of course.

[Anonymous]

I put my 2 cents in for the Challenger,but really would want a SD 70M.In N scale of course.

[Anonymous]

The GG1 is a classic loco that repersents the power and strenght of the pennsy.

[Anonymous]

The GG1 is a classic loco that repersents the power and strenght of the pennsy.

[gwrly]

I agree with the Canadians, we need more locos and rolling stock from the "True North".

Bob.
Australia

[gwrly]

I agree with the Canadians, we need more locos and rolling stock from the "True North".

Bob.
Australia

[ralphb]

while I chose the GG1, I also like the J1 and, maybe Ql, which were big, powerful earthshakers. Then there's also the lone HC1 which littered Horseshoe Curve with broken couplers and car parts because the trains it handled were more than the cars could take. Pennsy Power was real!

[ralphb]

while I chose the GG1, I also like the J1 and, maybe Ql, which were big, powerful earthshakers. Then there's also the lone HC1 which littered Horseshoe Curve with broken couplers and car parts because the trains it handled were more than the cars could take. Pennsy Power was real!