Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Modelling Trees

1992 views
20 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Modelling Trees
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:48 PM
Hi all, recently i've been building my new micro size n-scale layout, and im almost ready to begin scenery, thing is, like most, i cringe at spending money on scenry, like trees....and i've seen a few tutorials on making trees, but not to what i want, anyone have any good suggestion or links to tutorials on making trees?

Ryan
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:55 PM
Frist, we need a hint as to what kind of trees--and what time of year.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 5:01 PM
ahh yes, i was thinking, maybe a few midly tall ones, evergreen type, but mostly, variations of the standard tree, oak, maple, time of year will be spring/summer, as im trying to work with what i have, and save the income for the much larger layout later on

Ryan
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 5:06 PM
Mostly I get my trees from plants outside. Some of the plants with close-knit radial flowers will work nicely. The first step is to paint the stems grey, and then add ground foam to the upper part. Yellow paint dusted over the top brings out a sunlight highlight.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:30 PM
Super trees from Scenic Express are great & easy. They seem expensive, but you can get a lot more out of a bag than you would think, just follow the directions. One thing I would add is to push a thin wire up thru the trunk to give the tree more strenghth &keep it straight
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:06 PM
You can check out my forum scenery clinic here at this link:

http://model-trains-video.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=157

I talk about modeling scenery from A to Z, including how to make trees.


Scenery made using techniques in my Scenery Forum Clinic.

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Buffalo NY USA
  • 452 posts
Posted by edkowal on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:13 PM
The best online clinic I've ever seen is in French.

To translate it into pretty good English, first go to the Altavista Babelfish site at: http://babelfish.altavista.com/

Then scroll down to the Translate a Web Page section, choose French to English and enter: http://home.worldcom.ch/gribig/arbres%201.html for the address of the Web page.

Michel Gribi's clinic is the best I've seen, BUT, it is not a fast method. There is no fast and easy method for excellent trees. Of all the parts in the technique, perhaps the key is to work from photos or books of real trees. Everybody knows what a generic tree should look like, but the best tree models, like locomotive or building models, will be of specific types of tree. And the best way to get that right is to work from pictures of real trees.

-Ed

P.S. Forgot to mention the navigation buttons, which don't get translated because they're graphics, rather than text. "Accueil" will get you to the Home page of the site. "Conseils" will bring up a list of clinics. And "Suivant" at the bottom of the page, will bring up a page of completed examples made using the method, and the French-English description of the type of tree it's a model of. Each time you hit "Suivant" you'll get a new page of examples.

Five out of four people have trouble with fractions. -Anonymous
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. -Benjamin Franklin
"You don't have to be Jeeves to love butlers, but it helps." (Followers of Levi's Real Jewish Rye will get this one) -Ed K
 "A potted watch never boils." -Ed Kowal
If it's not fun, why do it ? -Ben & Jerry

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Boston
  • 2,226 posts
Posted by Budliner on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:46 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edkowal

The best online clinic I've ever seen is in French.

To translate it into pretty good English, first go to the Altavista Babelfish site at: http://babelfish.altavista.com/

Then scroll down to the Translate a Web Page section, choose French to English and enter: http://home.worldcom.ch/gribig/arbres%201.html for the address of the Web page.

Michel Gribi's clinic is the best I've seen, BUT, it is not a fast method. There is no fast and easy method for excellent trees. Of all the parts in the technique, perhaps the key is to work from photos or books of real trees. Everybody knows what a generic tree should look like, but the best tree models, like locomotive or building models, will be of specific types of tree. And the best way to get that right is to work from pictures of real trees.

-Ed

P.S. Forgot to mention the navigation buttons, which don't get translated because they're graphics, rather than text. "Accueil" will get you to the Home page of the site. "Conseils" will bring up a list of clinics. And "Suivant" at the bottom of the page, will bring up a page of completed examples made using the method, and the French-English description of the type of tree it's a model of. Each time you hit "Suivant" you'll get a new page of examples.


how for do he make trunk ??


K
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:47 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edkowal
There is no fast and easy method for excellent trees.


I guess I don't agree. The methods I use with Supertrees makes an excellent looking tree in less than 5 minutes per tree. Here's another photo of the trees:



Depends on how you define "excellent". If you mean species-specific trees that will look like the actual thing in ultra-closeup model photos, then yes, expect to spend some time making each and every tree painstakingly by hand.

But with the methods I use to make the trees you see in these photos, you can crank out 50 trees in an evening and all you have to know is how to use a spray can and how to sprinkle ground foam onto a supertree twig.

To see details, check out my online scenery clinic:
http://model-trains-video.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=157

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Buffalo NY USA
  • 452 posts
Posted by edkowal on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:53 PM
Super Trees won't work for all cases, or in all scales. I find that unless you're willing to beef up the trunk, you don't get a convincing tree.

The thin trunk that you get using an unmodified Super Tree wouldn't be strong enough to hold up the tree's foliage. The tree would fall down of its own weight.

-Ed

Five out of four people have trouble with fractions. -Anonymous
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. -Benjamin Franklin
"You don't have to be Jeeves to love butlers, but it helps." (Followers of Levi's Real Jewish Rye will get this one) -Ed K
 "A potted watch never boils." -Ed Kowal
If it's not fun, why do it ? -Ben & Jerry

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 297 posts
Posted by ngartshore350 on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 9:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jfugate

You can check out my forum scenery clinic here at this link:

http://model-trains-video.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=157

I talk about modeling scenery from A to Z, including how to make trees.


Scenery made using techniques in my Scenery Forum Clinic.


Great Forum on Scenery! Really useful and explained throughly

Not sure what "silfor" is, we might have another name for it in OZ?

Regards,

NG
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350

Not sure what "silfor" is, we might have another name for it in OZ?

Regards,

NG


Silflor is a special synthetic mat that you can get in various nap lengths. Here's more about it on my web site:


Click here to learn more:
http://siskiyou.railfan.net/model/constructionNotes/silflor.html

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: In the State of insanity!
  • 7,982 posts
Posted by pcarrell on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:31 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edkowal

Super Trees won't work for all cases, or in all scales. I find that unless you're willing to beef up the trunk, you don't get a convincing tree.


He's in N scale, so he probably won't have to beef the trunk much, if at all.

QUOTE: The thin trunk that you get using an unmodified Super Tree wouldn't be strong enough to hold up the tree's foliage. The tree would fall down of its own weight.


That's why Jerry suggested putting a wire inside the trunk.


Oh, and Joe,

I love your work. It's very inspirational. I have your scenery clinic bookmarked. (I've had it bookmarked for a long time. Good stuff!)
Philip
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Buffalo NY USA
  • 452 posts
Posted by edkowal on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:40 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by pcarrell
QUOTE: Originally posted by edkowal

The thin trunk that you get using an unmodified Super Tree wouldn't be strong enough to hold up the tree's foliage. The tree would fall down of its own weight.


That's why Jerry suggested putting a wire inside the trunk.



You misunderstand what I'm saying here. I'm not saying that you have to reinforce Super Trees or they will fall over on your layout. ( Although that may well be true. ) What I was attempting to say, is that when used all by themselves, without cosmetically adding to the girth of the trunk, the trunk does not look wide enough to support the weight of the leaves it would have, if it were a real world tree, and not a model of a tree. If you look at Super Trees when used on layouts, don't you get the feeling that they're a little "delicate" to be real trees? I do whenever I see them. That's what I meant. On the other hand, they've got great branch structure.



-Ed

Five out of four people have trouble with fractions. -Anonymous
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. -Benjamin Franklin
"You don't have to be Jeeves to love butlers, but it helps." (Followers of Levi's Real Jewish Rye will get this one) -Ed K
 "A potted watch never boils." -Ed Kowal
If it's not fun, why do it ? -Ben & Jerry

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Northern Indiana
  • 1,000 posts
Posted by PennsyHoosier on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:08 PM
I agree about supertrees. They are easy to use and produce very nice results. I highly recommend them.
Lawrence, The Pennsy Hoosier
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Wednesday, January 25, 2006 2:18 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edkowal

Super Trees won't work for all cases, or in all scales. I find that unless you're willing to beef up the trunk, you don't get a convincing tree.

The thin trunk that you get using an unmodified Super Tree wouldn't be strong enough to hold up the tree's foliage. The tree would fall down of its own weight.

-Ed


Ed:

You're right that supertrees won't work for all cases, but they work well, unmodified, in many cases. Here's a photo of the prototype Siskiyou Line. Notice the lightweight, spindly trunks on the trees in the foreground just over the edge of the highway bridge.


(Click to enlarge photo)

Now compare that to my model photo:

(Click to enlarge photo)

I'd say the supertrees do a pretty effective job, unmodified, of modeling the trees you see in the prototype photo. The prototype trees do remain standing, spindly trunks and all. [swg]

Agreed, not all types of trees can be modeled with supertrees, but a blanket statement that supertrees always need a thicker trunk isn't the case.

When you do need thicker trunks, Scenic Express also now has "Super Sage" trees. Still, for the bulk of your forest, you can use supertrees unmodified and then line the front of your forest with a line or two of Super Sage Trees to get the thicker trunks when you need them.


See: http://www.sceneryexpress.com/images/SuperSage_Dept2.jpg

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Wednesday, January 25, 2006 2:23 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by pcarrell
Oh, and Joe,

I love your work. It's very inspirational. I have your scenery clinic bookmarked. (I've had it bookmarked for a long time. Good stuff!)



Glad you find the info helpful, pc!

That's why I post it. [swg]

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 297 posts
Posted by ngartshore350 on Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:01 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jfugate

QUOTE: Originally posted by ngartshore350

Not sure what "silfor" is, we might have another name for it in OZ?

Regards,

NG


Silflor is a special synthetic mat that you can get in various nap lengths. Here's more about it on my web site:

Click here to learn more:
http://siskiyou.railfan.net/model/constructionNotes/silflor.html


Joe,

Thanks for the further explaination and the link, its great you took the time to explain it further.

Regards,

NG
  • Member since
    November 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,720 posts
Posted by MAbruce on Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:59 AM
I model in N-scale and have extensively used Supertrees on my layout. I’m happy with them and think they have worked out great. They are cost effective and have held up nicely for a couple of years now. I’m not sure I’d recommend them for N-trak modules or other portable applications. Not sure how they would hold up to the wear and tear under those circumstances.

Here’s a shot of some trees on my layout, although they’re not nearly as well done as what Joe Fugate has already shown:

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 29, 2006 7:47 PM
Thanks, guys for the help, hopefully ill get around to doing some this week...

Thanks

Ryan
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: ARCH CITY
  • 1,769 posts
Posted by tomkat-13 on Sunday, January 29, 2006 9:19 PM
I use a real plant that looks tree like. In the fall I pick the dried out plant, dust it with cheep hairspay, the spinkle on ground foam. Also I found out that if you plant the trees in odd number grouping (1-3-5-7-ect) they seem to look more natural.

I model MKT & CB&Q in Missouri. A MUST SEE LINK: Great photographs from glassplate negatives of St Louis 1914-1917!!!! http://www.usgennet.org/usa/mo/county/stlouis/kempland/glassplate.htm Boeing Employee RR Club-St Louis http://www.berrc-stl.com/

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!