Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Locos pointing in different directions, why?

1352 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Locos pointing in different directions, why?
Posted by electrolove on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:30 AM
Often I can see 2 or more locos like in these two pictures, pointing in different directions. I understand that they get more power this way but... You don't need a turntable for turning the locos, is that also a reason they do this on the prototype?



Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Crosby, Texas
  • 3,660 posts
Posted by cwclark on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:33 AM
yes, that is the reason they do it... it keeps the lead locomotive with the front facing forward and all they have to do is make a run around move and the train has the front of the engine pointing to the front at the other end of the train if need be....chuck

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:34 AM
More like for the lack of turning facilities. So on branchlines without turning facilities the crew can run short hood forward in both directions. Mechanicaly the engines run equaly well forward or backward.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:35 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cwclark

yes, that is the reason they do it... it keeps the lead locomotive with the front facing forward and all they have to do is make a run around move and the train has the front of the engine pointing to the front at the other end of the train if need be....chuck

Thanks, I'm not that stupid after all [:D]
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Virginia Beach
  • 2,150 posts
Posted by tangerine-jack on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:37 AM
Right, no real reason at all. Makes no difference which way they face, but most roads prefer the short nose to the front.

The Dixie D Short Line "Lux Lucet In Tenebris Nihil Igitur Mors Est Ad Nos 2001"

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:37 AM
That's the answer. When the train gets to the end of the line, the crew can just walk down to the other cab and go back the other way. Turntables hardly exist anymore, except on model railroads. Wyes take up a lot of real estate, and when you get to full-scale, there's no big hand to come out of the sky and turn your engines the other way.

Many US commuter-rail trains (the ones that take people between the suburbs and cities for work every day) run in "push-pull" mode with a locomotive on one end only. The end passenger car also has a control cab which links to the locomotive in the rear when it's going the other direction.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:40 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by MisterBeasley

That's the answer. When the train gets to the end of the line, the crew can just walk down to the other cab and go back the other way. Turntables hardly exist anymore, except on model railroads. Wyes take up a lot of real estate, and when you get to full-scale, there's no big hand to come out of the sky and turn your engines the other way.

Many US commuter-rail trains (the ones that take people between the suburbs and cities for work every day) run in "push-pull" mode with a locomotive on one end only. The end passenger car also has a control cab which links to the locomotive in the rear when it's going the other direction.

Thanks for the great answer, you guys are really cool [bow]
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Friday, December 30, 2005 2:40 PM
BTW: How did they turn around the California or Rio Grande Zephyr?

Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Mexico
  • 2,629 posts
Posted by egmurphy on Friday, December 30, 2005 2:50 PM
I can't speak to the Zephyr, but some of the bigger passenger terminals had loop tracks (yeah, a big reversing loop) that allowed them to turn the entire train and get it headed in the return direction. Then the train would be backed into the (usually) stub ended departure track.

Regards

Ed
The Rail Images Page of Ed Murphy "If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion and avoid the people, you might better stay home." - James Michener
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 30, 2005 2:53 PM
does running engines in different directions have anything to do with wear on the traction motors?
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: S.E. Adirondacks, NY
  • 3,246 posts
Posted by modelmaker51 on Friday, December 30, 2005 4:21 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dingoix

does running engines in different directions have anything to do with wear on the traction motors?


No. Locomotives run the same in either direction. The reason for running short hood forward is for better visibility. Some railroads (NS in particular) have only recently (the last 10years) switched to short hood forward.

In the beginning of diesel power, "standard practice" was to run long hood forward for increased crash protection, (just like steam engines - except for SPs cab forwards and that was to keep the exhaust out of the cabs in tunnels). Over time most railroads decided in favor of better visibility (with beefed up frames) of short hood forward with NS lagging behind everyone else.

Jay 

C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1 

Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: PtTownsendWA
  • 1,445 posts
Posted by johncolley on Friday, December 30, 2005 8:08 PM
Way back when SP West Oakland had the tracks to the pier they had a large Wye. and used that for turning engines or cars such as the observation car on the streamliners.
jc5729
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Ohio
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by Virginian on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:11 PM
NS was actually a leader, like her Southern and N&W predecessors. As such, they were the last to cave in to "lemming" pressure.
What could have happened.... did.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Napanee, Ontario, Canada
  • 247 posts
Posted by cmurray on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:17 PM
Many European locomotives are double-ended, with cabs on both ends. Some North American builders tried this many years ago, but they didn't go over well; it was cheaper to buy single cab locos and m.u. them. Greater flexibility, too.

Colin ---------- There's just no end to cabooseless trains.

My PhotoBucket album: http://s31.photobucket.com/albums/c390/CN4008/

My RailImages album: http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/4049

My web site: http://www.cmgraphics.ca

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Northern Indiana
  • 1,000 posts
Posted by PennsyHoosier on Friday, December 30, 2005 11:17 PM
Chad,

That is one SWEET pic!
Lawrence, The Pennsy Hoosier
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Saturday, December 31, 2005 3:50 AM
As far as turning passenger trains, some depots are/were one leg of a wye. St. Paul Union Depot in St.Paul MN for example was the SW leg of a SW/SE/NW wye. That way, say the GN Empire Builder coming from the west (North West leg) could run past the depot into the SE leg and then back in, cut off the GN engines, and then CBQ engines would take over and run the train to Chicago down the SE leg. Ditto for the return trip, CB&Q engines could pull the train up the NW leg of the wye, back into the depot, and the GN engines could take over.
Stix
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Sunday, January 1, 2006 12:15 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by electrolove

BTW: How did they turn around the California or Rio Grande Zephyr?

In Denver the train arrives and departes from the east side of Union Station. It is turned in a wye and backed into the station (Amtrak uses the same scheme today). Denver actually has two wyes to the east (the other one is on the UP using the interchange track to the Burlington).
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: NYNH&H Norwich & Worcester MP21.7
  • 774 posts
Posted by David_Telesha on Sunday, January 1, 2006 11:06 AM
Boston and Grand Central had/have loop tracks. Used by the NH of course. Boston's is gone I think.

The loops at passenger terminals were not just for engines - in fact they were actually for the passenger train to simply turn the whole train so the observation car is on the end and the rest of the consist is in the right order.

NH electrics all had two cabs and two diesels were needed for the mainline trains to Boston.

Road switchers that have hoods (GP9, H1644, GP38, etc, etc.) can run with either hood forward.

There is no real reason in consists over 2 engines that the ones in the middle face one way or another. Most RR's try and have the end units facing opposite directions for ease of use reasons - no need to turn the consist.
David Telesha New Haven Railroad - www.NHRHTA.org

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!