Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Train Trivia 12/02/05

1433 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Train Trivia 12/02/05
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Thursday, December 1, 2005 9:49 PM
In 1891, what was the heaviest locomotive in service?
A: 2-6-0
B: 2-8-0
C 4-6-2
D 0-10-0
Have fun! (Courtesy of Lotus098)

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 1, 2005 9:52 PM
i'd say 0-10-0
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 10,198 posts
Posted by howmus on Thursday, December 1, 2005 10:09 PM
I would guess the connie as it was a heavy freight engine. The 4-6-2 was used primarily as apassenger engine and was pretty rare then. The mogul was not a heavy engine and was used for light frieght and yard work. Never have seen a 0-10-0 so I don't know about that......

Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO

We'll get there sooner or later! 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Friday, December 2, 2005 1:20 AM
Regards to Lotus! My vote is for the 0-10-0.
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • 4,365 posts
Posted by Darth Santa Fe on Friday, December 2, 2005 1:32 PM
4-6-2?

_________________________________________________________________

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Friday, December 2, 2005 2:13 PM
4-6-2 would be indicative of a passenger train back then as the leading trucks were used to help keep the train on the track at high speeds. I don't think 0-10-0 were around in 1891, but I could be mistaken. My vote 2-8-0. They were used for hauling heavy loads over the Alleghanies by the Western Maryland and were popular up until the 40's as they advanced in design.

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Friday, December 2, 2005 2:49 PM
I vote for the 0-10-0. Don't know if they had one then or not.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: US
  • 225 posts
Posted by rrgrassi on Friday, December 2, 2005 3:12 PM
I would guess a 2-6-0 cause in 1896 a 4-6-0 was considered a heavy mountain type on the SP.
Ralph R. Grassi PRR, PennCentral, Conrail, SP, Cotton Belt, KCS and ATSF. My Restoration Project. Fairmont A-4: SPM 5806 c:\speeder\spm5806.jpg
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: West Coast
  • 315 posts
Posted by countershot on Friday, December 2, 2005 3:56 PM
4-6-2

Ben
http://community.webshots.com/album/337011280mnJplY http://photobucket.com/albums/c126/sd40-2/
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 2, 2005 4:25 PM
Id say this is a very dumb topic but thats just my opinion, have fun
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Friday, December 2, 2005 4:28 PM
I know the Northern Pacific had two 2-10-0 locos in 1887, but I don't know how much they weighed.

The 2-8-0's that I know of from that time period were tiny.

I don't think the Pacific class as we know it really make a big appearance until 1895 or so. But if they did exist they were probably pretty stout.

Soooo I'll guess 0-10-0 some monster lugger for coal back east!



  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 2, 2005 5:24 PM
Homer
Why ven answer if you think its dumb
My vote goes for the 2-8-0
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Friday, December 2, 2005 5:26 PM
I'll guess 0-10-0 but 2-8-0 is probably more likely.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Friday, December 2, 2005 7:35 PM
polls close in 4 hours! This is a 2 part series!

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 2, 2005 7:37 PM
I'll say 2-8-0.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Friday, December 2, 2005 7:55 PM
2-8-0

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Saturday, December 3, 2005 12:55 AM
0-10-0! The next one is coming soon on the same topic!

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!