Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Tyco HO Super 630 review

13882 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • 4,367 posts
Tyco HO Super 630 review
Posted by Darth Santa Fe on Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:06 PM

This review is on Tyco's older version of the Super 630, which is also better quality than their later production 630s in the 1980's.Smile



Some of you may be thinking, "Why Tyco?", but with a few adjustments this isn't a bad engine. The shell is pretty well detailed for an old train set quality diesel. The castings are smooth and when you take a close look, the detail is as good as or better than the Athearn diesels from the same time. The shell's only problem is the open pilots for the truck mounted couplers. They did mold the lift bar in a way that makes the middle stick out like it should, but it's done poorly and isn't recognizable unless you look closely. The older models (like the one reviewed) come with metal railings installed all the way around. The newer models don't have any railings, making the older ones look better. The paint is better quality than what you'll find on old Life-Like or 1980's Bachmann diesels. The seperation lines are a little sharper and the paint is coated smoothly. Mine came decorated in the Santa Fe Warbonnet, and they were also sold in Delaware and Hudson, Chessie, Illinois Central Gulf and a couple others. For some reason, Norfolk and Western was the only railroad that owned any high nosed C-630s and Tyco decided not to decorate them in N&W!Confused The trucks are undersized and obviously have completely made up sideframes.



The 630 test ran a little wobbly, but it ran pretty well overall. It runs best when it's warmed up a little, and it can be warmed up quickly by running it at 12 volts for about 30 seconds. After it's warm, I was able to keep it running at a minimum of 3 volts, and it's speed was from around 6 scale MPH to 10 SMPH. I couldn't keep it's lower speeds very steady. At 12 volts it's speed was around 160 SMPH. It drew .16 amps of current at full speed with no load, and it's stall current is .38 amps. At lower speeds it draws from .07 to .1 amps, but it can't be kept steady. The older drive system is higher quality than the newer one, because it has more durable black plastic gears while the newer one has it's larger gear made out of nylon. It runs surprisingly quiet for such a cheap engine going forward, but it's noisier in reverse. It's drawbar pull is strong enough to pull around 50 cars because of it's 3 traction tires. The coupler boxes are snapped onto the truck sideframe/axle retainer, making it easier to replace them with Kadees.

These older Super 630s are overall good engines for someone looking for something cheap, and the drives can be easily replaced with IHC or Stewart drives to make a nicer runner. That and some custom painting can make a nice model of the high nosed C-630s. So I'd say it was a $17 well spent.Big SmileStick out tongueBig Smile

If you want anymore information, than here's a link to a website with lots of Tyco info.Smile
http://tycotrain.tripod.com/tycotrains/index.html

_________________________________________________________________

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, October 20, 2005 10:18 AM
This reminds me of the old Tyco GP20. The drive was a joke, but that body had potential! Some of you may remember that Model Railroader had an article back in the 80s about sprucing the Tyco unit.

This Alco C630's body definetly has good potential. Nothing that parts from Details West and a little patience couldn't cure! Junk the drive system and replace with a newer drive. If you're modeling the prototype, the shell would have to be stripped and repainted to the Norfolk and Western scheme.

For me, if the southeastern railroads I"m modeling had owned 630s, I'd buy one since these show up a lot in model railroad flea markets and swap meets down here in Florida.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 20, 2005 4:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45

This reminds me of the old Tyco GP20. The drive was a joke, but that body had potential! Some of you may remember that Model Railroader had an article back in the 80s about sprucing the Tyco unit.


Reminds me of the Bachmann BQ23-7...The whole chassis is a complete joke, but the shell is worth a bit. I personally own 11 BQ23-7's.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 20, 2005 4:09 PM
Darth,

Good review! Keep 'em coming.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Dallas, GA
  • 2,643 posts
Posted by TrainFreak409 on Thursday, October 20, 2005 5:26 PM
I love the high-nose ALCo 630s. I hope someone makes an affordable one in N scale soon, maybe an expansion of the pre-existing Atlas C630 runs, I'd buy one in a heart beat.[:D] But then...the low-nose ones are good looking too.

Scott - Dispatcher, Norfolk Southern

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 10, 2006 9:52 PM
50 cars? Impressive. But I wouldn't run that many even if the gears are stronger they're still skinny. It's odd TYCO only offered ALCos in roadnames that didn't order them (in most cases). They offered the C430 in- rock island, Santa Fe, IC and others. none of these RRs ever purchased C430s.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Phoenix, Arizona
  • 1,989 posts
Posted by canazar on Saturday, March 11, 2006 3:01 AM
Considering that whole write up was for a TYCO.....


well, it was pretty good![:D]

Best Regards, Big John

Kiva Valley Railway- Freelanced road in central Arizona.  Visit the link to see my MR forum thread on The Building of the Whitton Branch on the  Kiva Valley Railway

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Euclid, Oh
  • 107 posts
Posted by dean_1230 on Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:29 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dingoix

50 cars? Impressive. But I wouldn't run that many even if the gears are stronger they're still skinny. It's odd TYCO only offered ALCos in roadnames that didn't order them (in most cases). They offered the C430 in- rock island, Santa Fe, IC and others. none of these RRs ever purchased C430s.


I still have the Rock Island C-430. It's been converted to the 5DCC control system (see April's MR for the system) and can now pull ever car in my fleet. Smooth AND quiet! i haven't invested in the 5DCC sound system yet, but the kids have.

Seriously, this loco (the RI c-430) is the reason i now have a layout. so tyco isn't all bad...

Dean
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 11, 2006 3:35 PM
No it's not all bad, the C430 shell I have has decent detail. But TYCO designed them for 5DCC after the motor died[;)][;)]
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:24 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dingoix

No it's not all bad, the C430 shell I have has decent detail. But TYCO designed them for 5DCC after the motor died[;)][;)]


If you get one of the early C430's (pre-Consolidated Foods era) with the older style MU-2 power truck (metal plate on the bottom), you have the potential of a good running loco, too. The later plastic drives, like the one shown for the C630 in the opening post, IS a prime candidate for conveson to 5-DCC operation.

I have 5 that I've had since the early 70's and they run great.

Something I'm not clear on from the initial review regarding the handrails, the Tyco's always came with the handrails in a package with the loco, I don't recall them ever being installed from the factory. The ones that don't have them may simply have had the handrail package lost.
Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by TomDiehl

Something I'm not clear on from the initial review regarding the handrails, the Tyco's always came with the handrails in a package with the loco, I don't recall them ever being installed from the factory. The ones that don't have them may simply have had the handrail package lost.

The last ones did not come with hand rails.

I still have a bunch of Tyco C630 shells, from when my era of interest was much longer, and quite a few Mehano C628 models. There are at least two versions of the Tyco C630 shell after the initial ones sold only by Sears - which had scale length tri-mount trucks. The earlier ones have the fuel tank wieght held in by two screws, and the wieghts are castings. On later ones, the fuel tank wieghts are a bunch of steel plates in a plastic box that snaps into the shell.

Using a Mehano C628 chassis is not difficult. A couple other uses for this shell include adapting the hi-nose to a C628 (Mehano - IHC, AHM, Model Power) - useful for both N&W and C&NW, or to a C425 (Atlas) for N&W. For a low nose C630, use the C628 or C425 cab and nose.

Then the Stewart model came along.......

Stewart (Bowser) has hand rails and other details that will work.
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Licking County, Ohio
  • 268 posts
Posted by outdoorsfellar on Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:56 PM
Wow ! That brings back a lot of memories. I still have my Chessie C630... somewhere.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Phoenix, Arizona
  • 1,989 posts
Posted by canazar on Saturday, March 11, 2006 8:14 PM
Ok OK..... I give in...

With all this talk about thw TYCO C630, I had to post this up.


This was my favorite engine when I was a kid. Ironically, turns out it is pretty rare. So, when I got the train bug after bringing out all of my old trains to share with my new (step) son, I got the fever and wanted to return this bad boy to its former glory. I can say, this engine is what got it all started for me. Planted the seeds but took 20 years to come to light
Well, I trashed it as a kid. So, I got new hand rails from a Silver Streak hi-nose, did a little trimmin, and shoved it on a Athearn BB GE U-33 frame. Some detail painting and he was better than new And bam! Old Glory returns to the rails!. Turns out, I "kit bashed", even before I knew the word. This picutre was taken on my old layout 1.5 years ago in honor of the 4th of July.. This engine is first on the list to be converted to DCC when I start my summer indoor projects.[:D]

Best Regards, Big John

Kiva Valley Railway- Freelanced road in central Arizona.  Visit the link to see my MR forum thread on The Building of the Whitton Branch on the  Kiva Valley Railway

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 11 posts
Posted by nibbler on Saturday, March 11, 2006 9:08 PM
Well it look like they can be made into other models too. This guy made a bunch of low noses from tyco 630s an 430s

http://www.freewebs.com/cbcnsfan/mlwc630ms.htm

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!