Isambard
Grizzly Northern history, Tales from the Grizzly and news on line at isambard5935.blogspot.com
Chip
Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
QUOTE: Originally posted by cmrproducts On my home layout (which some say is as big or bigger than some club layouts (25ft x 75 ft basement with 2700 + feet of track – 50 engines and 800 + cars) I only had one time where the Loco net was loaded down so far it went flakey.BOB H – Clarion, PA
QUOTE: Originally posted by cmrproducts Isambard I was running the layout with ONE (1) 8 amp command station. The only power to the Loconet is from the one command station. I wanted to see just how far I could pu***he system. I had OPTUDs (OP Till U Drop) about every 6 months for a while and would have anywhere between 30 to 40 operators. We would run 30 to 40 trains during the 12 hours session with 20 or so running at any one time. The system worked great. But then again we were using mostly radio keypads and very few plugged ones. Notice I stated was running one 8 amp. I now have 2 – 8 amp boosters plus the 8 amp command station. Why? Sound! When I started to run sound on the layout 3 BLI engines would not let it recover from a short and the system would trip unexplainably. With the 50 engines on the layout (and as I add sound engines others are removed to keep at the 50 level), it must have been at the 8 amp level. I have since broke the layout up into 3 very large blocks and added the 2 extra boosters. I am now up to 5 of my own sound units plus my operators are bringing in one each so we can have up to 10 or so on any given Ops night. I never did find out how many regular engines would stop the old 8 amp unit on my layout. BOB H – Clarion, PA
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker Why this would not be the case in the example listed I do not know, if actual Digitrax UP panels were used. The Loy's and Tony's panels are NOT identical to the Digitrax design. --Randy
QUOTE: Originally posted by Isambard QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker Why this would not be the case in the example listed I do not know, if actual Digitrax UP panels were used. The Loy's and Tony's panels are NOT identical to the Digitrax design. --Randy If you're referring to Ottawa Hotrak, their plug-ins panels are mainly standard telco panels fitted with either single or dual RJ12 receptacles. Since they have over 66 modules, many fitted with plug-ins, both frontside and backside, the cost saving vs using Digitrax panels is significant. As I understand it, their objective in disconnecting pins 1 and 6 at the command station/ booster loconet connection is to avoid drawing throttle power from the command station/booster with potential for glitches with many throttles plugged in. I'm encouraged by Bob H's experience recounted above. As our club layout is much smaller and we're not likely to run more than ten locos at a time, perhaps (and I repeat, perhaps, we won't have problems with our DCS100 and throttle power drains, batteries installed or not. [:)].