Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
General Discussion (Model Railroader)
»
P2K FA2/FB2 decoders?
P2K FA2/FB2 decoders?
1311 views
4 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
P2K FA2/FB2 decoders?
Posted by
Anonymous
on Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:24 AM
Anyone have an idea what decoders I should use on my P2K FA2/FB2 loco's. I'm running them linked and I have a few grade changes on my layout. I've heard that some decoders compensate for grade changes to keep same speed? Like cruise control.
Also I've noticed that my P2k Loco's run slower than my walthers and Rivirossi loco's. Not quite sure why that is?
Any help would be great,
Chad
Reply
Edit
MRRSparky
Member since
October 2001
From: Sumner, WA
242 posts
Posted by
MRRSparky
on Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:31 AM
I installed (2) DH-120's in a friend's FA/FB set and used Digitrax's Universal Consisting (through the command station) and it works beautifully.
However, I will reprogram them to consist through the decoder because the Universal Consisting is only supported through the command station where I did the programming.
Another nice thing about the DH-120's: they have Digitrax's wiring harness. That means you can easily separate the decoder from the wiring harness and install any Digitrax decoder you might like in the hard-wired (or plug-in) harness.
I have DH-142's in my steamers since they support back EMF control. Back EMF control allows you to configure the variables to adjust the locos, even those consisted, to maintain the same speed regardless of grade. The DH-120's were sitting around unused and seemed to be a good fit for a user who is not DCC-knowledgeable.
Reply
nfmisso
Member since
December 2001
From: San Jose, California
3,154 posts
Posted by
nfmisso
on Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:20 PM
Hi Chad;
I would suggest Digitrax decoders: the DH123D for the B unit, and the DH163LO for the A unit.
The DH120 and DH140 that the other poster used are no longer in production.
The 123 is very inexpensive, and has limited ability to control, but you don't need much for a B unit. The 163 can control 6 funcitons, like different lights, etc. Both have simialr motor control systems, so matchin is not an issue.
See:
http://www.dcctrains.com/products/digitrax_decs.htm
Many P2K locomotives have constant lighting circuits in series with the motor when the dummy DCC plug is installed, which reduces the voltage available to the motor - so it runs slower.
Nigel
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:32 AM
Nigel
Wow, thanks for the details! Couple more ?'s for ya.
So, when I get the decoders hooked up the speed should be a bit faster?
From the instructions that come with the loco's it tells me to also change the head light when going to DCC.
To run both loco's together paired....I can just assign the same decoder address....right?
Chad
Reply
Edit
nfmisso
Member since
December 2001
From: San Jose, California
3,154 posts
Posted by
nfmisso
on Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:43 AM
Hi Chad;
If you use the DH163 series decoder, you do not need to change the lights. That is one of the unique features of this series of decoders.
You can program the decoders to make the locomotives as fast as you want within reason. DCC systems typically put more voltage on the track than DC systems, and then is just programming the speed tables until you get what you want.
You could assign the same address to both if you want. I would not, with 4 digit addresses, there are 9995 useable unique addresses (0, 1, 2, and 3 are used for other things; 0 is for controlling a DC locomotive - not recommended, 3 is the default setting of all decoders, so it is best to not to use it for anything but test a brand new loco/decoder). Another reason is that you can individually tweek each address (locomotive) while it is on the regular track; if you system supports this, the decoders I suggest do.
Nigel
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up