Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Train Trivia (ANSWERED)

995 views
19 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Train Trivia (ANSWERED)
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 10:49 PM
Sorry about missing a few days I went to protland to see Neil Diamond, the Uninon Station, and the Challenger. So here is today's question.
ANWER: 8-10
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Alabama
  • 1,077 posts
Posted by cjcrescent on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 10:58 PM
uuhh...does 'too much' count????

Carey

Keep it between the Rails

Alabama Central Homepage

Nara member #128

NMRA &SER Life member

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:03 PM
Don't ask me to do all the shoveling ;-) Any other volunters? And where there any engines who burned more coal per hour? or is that a stupid question? DD
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:04 PM
I heard that if you shovled it, you wouldn't get enough steam to blow the whistle.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:56 PM
Which one should I choose if I want to select 10? (or even 8 or 12, for that matter?) Two choices for each of these! For some reason, I was thinking that it was about 5 tons per hour, but that isn't an option. I guess I'll wait for the answer soon.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Peoria IL
  • 490 posts
Posted by cspmo on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:32 AM
If you are talking about now, the answer is zero.
If you are talking about before they were converted to oil I don't know, so I'll say No.2(8-10)
Brian
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Hot'lanta, Gawga
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Rotorranch on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:44 AM
From what I've read, the answer isn't UP there! ( Pun intended! [;)] )

I read somewhere between 22-28 tons per hour at full steam!

Rotor

 Jake: How often does the train go by? Elwood: So often you won't even notice ...

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • 450 posts
Posted by 1shado1 on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 6:35 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cspmo

If you are talking about now, the answer is zero.
If you are talking about before they were converted to oil I don't know, so I'll say No.2(8-10)


Only 1 of the 25 Big Boys (#4005, I think) was ever converted to oil burning. The experiment was unsuccessful and she was returned to coal burning.
Also, the original question was about how many tons WERE (past tense) burned, not how many tons are burned now. Although your answer of zero tons now is correct (and funny). [:D]

Jeff
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,238 posts
Posted by tstage on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:31 AM
And the answer is...?

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • 450 posts
Posted by 1shado1 on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:26 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tstage

And the answer is...?


He won't reveal the answer until 10PM.[:D]

Jeff
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:33 AM
more than i wanna carry
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 1,619 posts
Posted by West Coast S on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:38 PM
Whatever it takes! I wonder what the crews did if the stoker froze due to one of those infamous Wyoming blizzards? Put another Big Boy on the barbie mate!

You are correct in 4005 being the victim of the failed oil conversion, the UP employed a single burner where two should have been installed, poor steaming abilities, low boiler pressure, oil control issues were the main reason for the failure. It was done out of desperation due to it's main coal supplier being out on strike yet again at the height of the fall rush season.


Dave
SP the way it was in S scale
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Hot'lanta, Gawga
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Rotorranch on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:59 PM
quote from: http://www.trainweb.org/jlsrr/bigboy/information/dimensions/dimensions.htm

Under full steam, the engine burned an average of 122,500lbs of water (12,500 gallons) and 22 tons (44,000lbs) of semi-bituminous coal per hour! However, it has been know to happen when pulling an extremely long train up Sherman Hill, BigBoy would burn 225,000lbs (25,000 gallons) of water an 28 tons (56,000lbs) of coal in a 27 mile period! He had a voracious appetite



I knew I'd read that somewhere!

Rotor

 Jake: How often does the train go by? Elwood: So often you won't even notice ...

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 10,198 posts
Posted by howmus on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Rotorranch

quote from: http://www.trainweb.org/jlsrr/bigboy/information/dimensions/dimensions.htm

Under full steam, the engine burned an average of 122,500lbs of water (12,500 gallons) and 22 tons (44,000lbs) of semi-bituminous coal per hour! However, it has been know to happen when pulling an extremely long train up Sherman Hill, BigBoy would burn 225,000lbs (25,000 gallons) of water an 28 tons (56,000lbs) of coal in a 27 mile period! He had a voracious appetite



I knew I'd read that somewhere!

Rotor



Yep that is what they said down at Steamtown!

Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO

We'll get there sooner or later! 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:58 PM
The history channel said on average it burned 8-10 tons of coal an hour.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • 450 posts
Posted by 1shado1 on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:11 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098

The history channel said on average it burned 8-10 tons of coal an hour.


And in the same show I believe they claimed that there were 20 Big Boys, not 25. So don't believe everything you hear on the history channel.[:D]

Jeff
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Hot'lanta, Gawga
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Rotorranch on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:45 PM
Quote from: http://www.nationalrrmuseum.org/collections-092-steam-up-4017.html

The large 14-wheel tender attached to Big Boy could carry 28 tons of coal and 24,000 gallons of water. This was enough to feed the locomotive for about an hour when hauling a train over the Wahsatch or Sherman Hill. In fact, a fuel stop was usually required at Red Buttes or Harriman between Cheyenne and Laramie, a distance of 55 miles.


Once again, it seems, don't believe everything you see on TV! [:D]

Rotor

 Jake: How often does the train go by? Elwood: So often you won't even notice ...

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:47 PM
What about coming down Sherman Hill, then how much is used? 8-10 tons average also matches an old UP film I have.
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Hot'lanta, Gawga
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Rotorranch on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:49 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098


ANWER: 8-10


That must have been going downhill! [;)][:D][:p]

Rotor

 Jake: How often does the train go by? Elwood: So often you won't even notice ...

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 10:58 PM
Or more likely flat with no load.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!