Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Walthers?

2437 views
51 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Walthers?
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 6:56 AM
I work over seas and have been out of the loop for while. I just got my 2005 walters catalog. and I see they do not carry the Atheran of round house cars or engines what's UP.All I see is the top end cars the cheapest ones are around $12.00 Has our hobby gotten to the point where the blue collar worker will no longer be able to afford model trains and only the white colar workers will enjoy this hobby? Yes I under stand the cars have more detail but give me a break the tycipal car was around $20.00 let's hear what you'all think ?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:14 AM
I know exactly what you mean! Im in the military and make close to nothing, my hobby pretty much is just for looking right now. I love model railroading, but might have to take up dumpster diving someday instead!
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 3,150 posts
Posted by CNJ831 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:26 AM
Welcome back to today's version of the hobby! Athearn and MDC are now the property of Horizon, a competitor of Walthers, so you won't see their products in the Walthers' catalog any longer.

As to prices, the days of this hobby being easily affordable to blue collar workers and retirees (always the hobby's base in past decades) are passing into history. A check of ads in the hobby magazines over the past few years will demonstrate that just about each new offering gains slightly in price over the one that preceeded it and it is clear that the manufacturers are aiming at a more well-to-do, discriminating, clientele than in decades past.

If you've got full pockets it's probably a great time to be in the hobby, otherwise you may be disappointed at what you see going on.

CNJ831
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:55 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by JJUrich

I work over seas and have been out of the loop for while. I just got my 2005 walters catalog. and I see they do not carry the Atheran of round house cars or engines what's UP.All I see is the top end cars the cheapest ones are around $12.00 Has our hobby gotten to the point where the blue collar worker will no longer be able to afford model trains and only the white colar workers will enjoy this hobby? Yes I under stand the cars have more detail but give me a break the tycipal car was around $20.00 let's hear what you'all think ?


1) this has NEVER been a "poor man's hobby". In 1960, paying $65 for a brass 4-6-0 was a whole lot more of a stretch for the "average worker" than is paying $109 for a BETTER 4-6-0, made by Bachmann in plastic. If the average teenager cam plunk down $70 for a Gameboy game, he can plunk down $75 for an engine. If you can't afford the prices of "average" equipment, shop around online, go to swaps looking for used stuff, of learn to make the toy train set junque run better.

2) You really didn't look that hard through Walther's offerings, did you? I did a simple search in HO scale for "box car", and came up with 25 manufacturers and over 2000 line items. The lowest price I saw was $4.99 (IHC old timer box), and the highest I saw was $29.99 (F&C resin kit). In all, the rough average price was $15.25. A bit high from what I remember cruddy Athearn Blue Box kits going for these days ($10.95 when you can find them), but still nowhere at "break the bank" level. There were 15 manufacturers selling boxcars at or below the $10 level.

The hobby isn't too expensive; it's not being dragged down by the evil mega corporations just looking for a buck, the brass and limited run buyers aren't driving up prices, and the rivet counters aren't killing the hobby by making everything too detailed. This is a HOBBY; if you don't want to pay lots of money just to have a toy choo-choo, you don't have to. There are inexpensive options right in front of you, on a lower shelf.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:04 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by JJUrich

I work over seas and have been out of the loop for while. I just got my 2005 walters catalog. and I see they do not carry the Atheran of round house cars or engines what's UP.All I see is the top end cars the cheapest ones are around $12.00 Has our hobby gotten to the point where the blue collar worker will no longer be able to afford model trains and only the white colar workers will enjoy this hobby? Yes I under stand the cars have more detail but give me a break the tycipal car was around $20.00 let's hear what you'all think ?


All is not lost.....The Athearn Blue Box line of innexpensive kits is alive and well, just not in the Walthers catalog (not a good move IMO!) I would also suggest you take a look at the Accurail line of rolling stock. Better than Athearn and not much more expensive. The Walthers catalog prices are also the full retail price. There is no reason to pay that price for anything in MRR. There are many web retailers that sell 20% below these prices and sometimes more. (Look for a recent thread on Web retailers). Locomotive prices have certainly been spiraling upwards. But then, so have the features. Many new locos coming to market are being offered with DCC sound decoders as standard at about $200.00. But and a big but.... If you are not into DCC, and don't care about sound, look for good deals on LifeLike Proto 2000 on the web. You can pick up really well detailed great running models for $30-$50 So you really do not have to break the bank to get a decent looking MRR roster. Be selective, look for bargains and you can do well.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 3,150 posts
Posted by CNJ831 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:28 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy

1) this has NEVER been a "poor man's hobby". In 1960, paying $65 for a brass 4-6-0 was a whole lot more of a stretch for the "average worker" than is paying $109 for a BETTER 4-6-0, made by Bachmann in plastic.


Just a thought on this point, since its ilk appears so often in our posts. After 45 years of technical advancement, wouldn't it be far more logical to expect a current version of such a model to sell for the same or less than it did in 1960? That's the case with almost every other common or household electronic item on the market (TV, refigerator, stoves, radio/player, blenders, and even more modern items like computers, VCRs, video cameras in the original non-digital format...the list in endless). In fact, what we've seen is that HO locomotives have typically increased 10-fold in price (in some cases 30x) over similar-item1960 pricing. Technological advancement is supposed to lower prices, not increase them dramatically. And, no, CPI does not justify such an increase since hobby items are purchased with dispossable income and are not in the same category as necessities. Items purchased with dispossable income have historically risen at a much lower rate than the CPI.

CNJ831
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: oregon
  • 885 posts
Posted by oleirish on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:40 AM
I love model trains,All I have to do now is be vary carefull on what I buy and where I buy It[:)]I have found a few good buys on E-BAY,but far and few between!Here in southren oregon we have one train show a year,you can make out pretty good there also.[8D] Our two LHS do'nt have much but the basic things B.B. stuff,and altas stuff.But they allways say "WE CAN ORDER IT FOR YOU"so most stuff I get through mail order.[^]

OLE'IRISH
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Anderson Indiana
  • 1,301 posts
Posted by rogerhensley on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:45 AM
I wish folks would stop with the 'Not a Poor Man's Hobby' stuff. It has been a very affordable hobby for many years until recently. Some can be blamed on EPA and OSHA causing some manufacturing to be moved overseas.

But I submit that Athearn rolling stock was $1.75 to $1.95 in the late 70s and slightly higher in the early 80s at $2.25 to $2.50 for some of the newer items. Inflation then took a toll, and prices increased again, but I could start a newcomer in the hobby in 1982 for $50 to $100. $250 would get a great beginner's layout started with all kinds of goodies.

Funny thing, even with the lower wages, more folks could afford a start then than now.

In 1971, I went to Woolworth's at Christmas time and bought enough HO stuff for a 4x8 layout for my 3 boys complete with different complete trains for each. I MAY have spent $65 or $75. Maybe.

If someone can afford the new prices, that's great, but many potential hobbiests cannot. Will that hurt? "You Betcha, Red Ryder".

Roger Hensley
= ECI Railroad - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/eci/eci_new.html =
= Railroads of Madison County - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 180 posts
Posted by tsasala on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:38 AM
A quick search on Walthers will show the increase cost in locos. Sure you can find a $40 loco on Walthers, but 95% of them are over $100 (not on sale). Given that most hobbiests want/need more than one (more than 10 or 20 in many cases), that's a pretty expensive hobby. That doesn't even cover the cost of the rolling stock, track, power packs, scenery, etc..

When I got out of the hobby nearly 20 years ago, an entire train set was a the cost of a single loco these days. One has to ask, does it really cost $120 for an "adequately" detailed loco? Perhaps demand has gone down, which is driving up prices. The catch 22 is that as prices go up further, demand will go down even more, continuing the vicious circle until the hobby is nearly non-existent.

-Tom
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:43 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CNJ831

Just a thought on this point, since its ilk appears so often in our posts. After 45 years of technical advancement, wouldn't it be far more logical to expect a current version of such a model to sell for the same or less than it did in 1960? That's the case with almost every other common or household electronic item on the market (TV, refigerator, stoves, radio/player, blenders, and even more modern items like computers, VCRs, video cameras in the original non-digital format...the list in endless).


You are spot on, and that's the problem. The technological advances that have allowed mass market consumer products to come down in price are advances in supply chain management, and production methods. MRR is not a mass market consumer market. It can not benefit from these technoligical advances. More importantly, it can not opperate on this type of business model where millions of low margin systems are sold to make a profitable business. Like it or not, this is a specialist low volume market. Look at any other adult/collectors type hobby and you will see similar pricing structure. (RC Planes, Classic Auto parts etc).

The other point that should be noted is that we are in the early phase of a market shift. DCC sound is relatively new, hot, and high priced. It will no doubt come down a little in price. All the indications are that new competition is on the way and the price will come down. Look at the DCC controller market. There are now entry level DCC systems under $100.00 3 years ago the cheapest was over $200.00. This is exactly what happens in the consumer market. MP3 players started in the $500 range, they are now in the $200 dollar range. The thing we must all remember is that MRR is far too small a market for companies to survive on very small margins.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:02 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tsasala



When I got out of the hobby nearly 20 years ago, an entire train set was a the cost of a single loco these days. One has to ask, does it really cost $120 for an "adequately" detailed loco?
-Tom


No, not at all. http://www.trainworld1.com/lifelike/lifelike_proto.htm Follow this link, and or search any other on-line retailer and you can find really well detailed locomotives, far better than anything in a starter train set from 20 years ago for under $50 and even in the $20's (Proto 1K locomotives are a great example of a well made, smooth running locomotive with moderate detail) A decent trainset can be had for $100-$120 a real cheap on for about $50.00. You abselutely do not have to spend $120 on a locomotive. Unless of course you want installed DCC, and Sound and then you can easily spend more, but then this is not really to be compared to a basic loco from 20 yrs ago.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:19 AM
You are overlooking that for the price you are getting (in say, an Atlas Master/Gold) a locomotive that approaches the best brass in detail, far superior drive quality, DCC and sound !

A far cry from the old blue box level !!!!

You are getting your monies worth, IMHO.



  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:45 AM
I just finished looking over some of Atlas's GOld Line HO desiels with QSI sound and DCC ready to go.

For the money they are absolutely top of the line they even have ditch lights. For plastic that is awesome.

Let's say I want to buy two of these in different numbers... $500.00 total not including tax. (10% in my area)

Let's say I want 15 Intermodal Double stacks with it from Intermountain (A-Line) They come in sets of 5. Then I need three boxes at about 110.00 each

330.00

They dont have containers. More money for containers.

DCC Digitrax and some track. Each switch costs money.

By the time I am ready to put this train together and run it I am over 1000.00

20 years ago I recall buying two GP30's, 20 Athearn Blue Box cars and a Tech 2 transformer. Sound and DCC was not in the hobby and some of the finer offerings did not exist back then.

Total cost Approx 150 for the two Spectrum GP30's

Blue Box 3.00 x 20 cars @ 60.00

Power pack 50.00

Track etc cheap.

Roughly 230.00 done.

Yes the money has gone way up in costs between 1980 and 2000.

The 1980 train set is a hell of alot of fun back then, still is today. But probably will cost 4 times as much to put together. because we are paying 14.00 for RTR cars instead of kits.

The 2000 trainset I described is RTR and has sound, DCC control lights etc...

Try doing that in 1980.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 11:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CNJ831

QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy

1) this has NEVER been a "poor man's hobby". In 1960, paying $65 for a brass 4-6-0 was a whole lot more of a stretch for the "average worker" than is paying $109 for a BETTER 4-6-0, made by Bachmann in plastic.


Just a thought on this point, since its ilk appears so often in our posts. After 45 years of technical advancement, wouldn't it be far more logical to expect a current version of such a model to sell for the same or less than it did in 1960?


How is this a logical supposition? The costs for everything, in both raw numbers and in actual purchasing power, has ALWAYS gone up, not down. The costs for everything go UP, due to increased manufacturing costs (labor, materials, energy, liability, etc). All these costs have to be amortized into the end price of the item. Sure, if Athearn could still pay an American worker $4 an hour, we might still see $2.00 Blue Box kits, but not today.

QUOTE:
That's the case with almost every other common or household electronic item on the market (TV, refigerator, stoves, radio/player, blenders, and even more modern items like computers, VCRs, video cameras in the original non-digital format...the list in endless).


I don't have to time to dig through the Department of Commerce's website today, but even on the face of things, this is a complete lie. Cars in 1970 cost $4000. Today they cost $24000. Houses in 1940 cost $3000, today they cost $250000.

QUOTE:
In fact, what we've seen is that HO locomotives have typically increased 10-fold in price (in some cases 30x) over similar-item1960 pricing. Technological advancement is supposed to lower prices, not increase them dramatically.


Show me a SINGLE engine in 1960 that comes anywhere close to being comperable to a P2K GP9, Kato SD45, or BLI M-1a 4-8-2. Go on, I dare you.

Oh...the cost of a 1920s-era Lionel or Marx set was, on average, two year's wages for the "average" laborer in the USA. Since WHEN was this hobby affordable to "everyman"?

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 3,150 posts
Posted by CNJ831 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:13 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy

QUOTE: Originally posted by CNJ831

QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy

1) this has NEVER been a "poor man's hobby". In 1960, paying $65 for a brass 4-6-0 was a whole lot more of a stretch for the "average worker" than is paying $109 for a BETTER 4-6-0, made by Bachmann in plastic.


Just a thought on this point, since its ilk appears so often in our posts. After 45 years of technical advancement, wouldn't it be far more logical to expect a current version of such a model to sell for the same or less than it did in 1960?


How is this a logical supposition? The costs for everything, in both raw numbers and in actual purchasing power, has ALWAYS gone up, not down. The costs for everything go UP, due to increased manufacturing costs (labor, materials, energy, liability, etc). All these costs have to be amortized into the end price of the item. Sure, if Athearn could still pay an American worker $4 an hour, we might still see $2.00 Blue Box kits, but not today.

QUOTE:
That's the case with almost every other common or household electronic item on the market (TV, refigerator, stoves, radio/player, blenders, and even more modern items like computers, VCRs, video cameras in the original non-digital format...the list in endless).


I don't have to time to dig through the Department of Commerce's website today, but even on the face of things, this is a complete lie. Cars in 1970 cost $4000. Today they cost $24000. Houses in 1940 cost $3000, today they cost $250000.

QUOTE:
In fact, what we've seen is that HO locomotives have typically increased 10-fold in price (in some cases 30x) over similar-item1960 pricing. Technological advancement is supposed to lower prices, not increase them dramatically.


Show me a SINGLE engine in 1960 that comes anywhere close to being comperable to a P2K GP9, Kato SD45, or BLI M-1a 4-8-2. Go on, I dare you.

Oh...the cost of a 1920s-era Lionel or Marx set was, on average, two year's wages for the "average" laborer in the USA. Since WHEN was this hobby affordable to "everyman"?


Ray - Point #1, do you really think Athearn is paying the Chinese $4 an hour? More like $.40 an hour. All these companies went overseas to cut their costs dramatically and what did the consumer see...increased prices across the board for all newer items. The name of the game has become "charge as much as the public will bear." In the past, when nearly all the model railroading companies were owned and operated by individuals who were actually hobbyist, this most definitely was not the case.

Point #2, a car is a necessity today, not an item purchased with dispossable income like model trains. And a house certainly doesn't fall into this category. I recall color TVs in 1957 running $500-$1000+. What does a similar TV cost today...maybe $500 (less fancy units much less). The blender, stove, etc. all have changed very little in price over the same period but quality-wise they are many times better. I understand that there is the matter of consumer base but prices did not start to get out of control for hobbyist until just the last 10 years.

Point #3, you suggest that you can not compare a 1960 Athearn GP-9 with today's PK2, Kato, or BLI. I say yes you most certainly can! The 1960 Athearn was essentially state of-the-art for the hobby in that day, just as the others are for today. You are comparing the typical best of one era with another and that's quite fair. In that sense, there has most certainly been a decided relative price increase for what you are getting as a state-of-the-art product.

Point #4, where in the world did you get the figure that a 1920's Lionel or Marx train set was an average the of two year's wages for the working man? Are we talking about the handful of virtually custom made President Specials that were on a par with the handbuilt brass G-scale consists offered today by companies like Fine Art Models that run into many tens of thousands of dollars? We're certainly not talking normal consumer goods here, that is for sure (in fact, we're talking about childrens' tin-plate toys, not scale models anyway).

If you care to go back and read issues of MR or RMC from the 1950's through the early 1980's you will most definitely find that our hobby was very affordable during this era for blue collar workers and, in fact, grew relatively cheaper over the course of most of that time period.

CNJ831
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:14 PM
This subject keeps appearing in one form or another. I'll restate what I've always maintained in those other rehashes: we have just as much disposable income as we've always had, all things being equal. What we elect to do with it is a personal choice. Some buy season's tickets, some a $2000 set of golf clubs, others put thousands into a hot car that is only driven on Sunday afternoons to the beach, and others wait until they can scrape together $20 for a boxcar kit.

There are some who do not own refrigerators, or who don't even eat meals regularly. Many of them are drug addicts who make conscious decisions to buy drugs, and not to eat., or to bru***heir teeth.

I am by no means rich, but I can come up with $280 now and then to get YET ANOTHER!!... DCC loco to fill another bank spot in my many drawers that house all of my locos (I only have two (2) locos, in truth, but I am amazed at the number of respondants here who claim to own several dozens of whatever Company X puts out in their catalog).

We all spend as we bloody well wi***o. If we want something badly enough, it'll happen most often.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:23 PM
www.walthers.com also has a monthly sales flyer
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:28 PM
While you were gone, Athearn was sold and now is exclusive to Horizon Models. The fact that Horizon will only sell to hobby shop dealers and not other distributors or to the bargin basement dealers should be taken to court to see if they can force a monopoly on their products in a market that is very small, and now they can control the prices as they see fit.

You can look forward to higher prices and limited amount of products available from Horizon as one distributor cannot stock the same level as literally hundreds of small distributors.

My feeling is that Athearn will sell less products overall now because more people sold their product prior to this action and Horizon will have to stock more of their own products.



  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 2, 2005 1:53 AM
Originally posted by orsonroy
[]

1) this has NEVER been a "poor man's hobby". In 1960, paying $65 for a brass 4-6-0 was a whole lot more of a stretch for the "average worker" than is paying $109 for a BETTER 4-6-0, made by Bachmann in plastic. If the average teenager cam plunk down $70 for a Gameboy game, he can plunk down $75 for an engine. If you can't afford the prices of "average" equipment, shop around online, go to swaps looking for used stuff, of learn to make the toy train set junque run better.

I take a fence to you comment the normal worker at say to your local Walmart worker that wants to get into to stay in the hobby with a say small family $75. is a lot of money I know I was there. and my buying was on hold. a $20 box car was 3 months of saving if I was lucky. As for a $70 game boy LOL my kids were lucky if we had the money at X-mas for that. I do not see how the normal working man or woman back in the states are making it now with the price of gas and every thing else! Even with the income I have now my hobby is on hold. You talked about the prices just going up with time I agre with you but give me a break $44. for a Trix caboose Show me were the $44. worth of plastic is and we know it is not in labor In Iraq the average worker makes $6. aday not a hour and that is on a american base O and buy the way since I got my walters book I have looked at it every day The lower end you talked about is the same Junk that we all stated with back 30 years ago I do buy on line mostly ebay over here NOT a lot of swap meets in Baghdad. Or at least that I'm willing to go to.
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,247 posts
Posted by tstage on Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:06 AM
I have to concur with Simon. Check out Trainworld.com (http://www.trainworld.com) and you can find some sweet deals if you just look around. My favorite is still the Proto 2000 Alco S1 switcher. Regularly $110 MSRP, it can be had on "Blowout" for $29.99 to $39.99 - depending on what road name you want. Terrific lil' switcher that runs smooth at very slow speeds and looks terrific. So...you don't have to spend a bundle to find a quality locomotive.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Thursday, June 2, 2005 4:55 AM
QUOTE: If you care to go back and read issues of MR or RMC from the 1950's through the early 1980's you will most definitely find that our hobby was very affordable during this era for blue collar workers and, in fact, grew relatively cheaper over the course of most of that time period.


The problem is not that model railroad equipment costs that much more--in fact, if you compare prices to inflation rates they seem pretty stable--the problem is that the blue-collar working man makes a lot less, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than he used to!

30-40 years ago, a "blue-collar working man" was a factory worker, probably union, and made enough money to afford a house and a car payment.

Today, a "blue-collar worker" is a service employee, probably not making much more than minimum wage, and if they're lucky they can afford to rent an apartment and maybe have a used car. Wal-Mart workers are in this soup: part of why Wal-Marts prices are so low (aside from their special deals with the Communist Chinese) is because they pay their workers so little and don't provide health insurance.

It's not the model railroad companies that are greedy jerks--IT'S YOUR BOSS!! Maybe you should stop getting mad at model railroad companies, and start getting mad at your boss instead.

Model railroading has never been a POOR MAN'S hobby--typically someone who is as poor as the typical Wal-Mart employee doesn't have enough room, free time or disposable income to do much model railroading. But BLUE COLLAR didn't always mean POOR--in the fifties through the seventies, many blue-collar workers were considered middle-class. In our transition from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, working-class people earn less and fall out of that middle-class category.

And model railroading is pretty much a middle-class hobby. It assumes that you can afford a home big enough to fit a layout, and enough disposable income to spend some money on trains. It has never been a hobby for the poor and destitute--unfortunately, a social class that is growing in the United States.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Thursday, June 2, 2005 8:12 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by JJUrich


QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy
1) this has NEVER been a "poor man's hobby". In 1960, paying $65 for a brass 4-6-0 was a whole lot more of a stretch for the "average worker" than is paying $109 for a BETTER 4-6-0, made by Bachmann in plastic. If the average teenager cam plunk down $70 for a Gameboy game, he can plunk down $75 for an engine. If you can't afford the prices of "average" equipment, shop around online, go to swaps looking for used stuff, of learn to make the toy train set junque run better.


I take a fence to you comment the normal worker at say to your local Walmart worker that wants to get into to stay in the hobby with a say small family $75. is a lot of money I know I was there. and my buying was on hold. a $20 box car was 3 months of saving if I was lucky. As for a $70 game boy LOL my kids were lucky if we had the money at X-mas for that. I do not see how the normal working man or woman back in the states are making it now with the price of gas and every thing else! Even with the income I have now my hobby is on hold. You talked about the prices just going up with time I agre with you but give me a break $44. for a Trix caboose Show me were the $44. worth of plastic is and we know it is not in labor In Iraq the average worker makes $6. aday not a hour and that is on a american base O and buy the way since I got my walters book I have looked at it every day The lower end you talked about is the same Junk that we all stated with back 30 years ago I do buy on line mostly ebay over here NOT a lot of swap meets in Baghdad. Or at least that I'm willing to go to.


Hey, a MRR in the sandbox!

Anyway, look at your post:
QUOTE:
O and buy the way since I got my walters book I have looked at it every day The lower end you talked about is the same Junk that we all stated with back 30 years ago

Who ever said anyone was entitled to quality products at an inexpensive price, EVER in the entire history of mankind? You want quality, you pay for it. This hobby IS affordable to the average consumer, but as with anything else, you have to compromise. I'd really like to own a Land Rover, but I'm happy with my Jeep. I'd really like 200 acres of woods and a 4500 square foot basement, but I'm happy with my normal urban lot and 30x32 house.

And with everything else, this is a HOBBY. If you cannot afford $20 in discretionary spending a week (or ever) then you shouldn't HAVE a hobby; you should be doing everything you can to inprove your life and to keep food on the table. People aren't entitled to hobbies, either.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 2, 2005 10:27 AM
Were do you get OFF telling people that they should not have a hobby ! Yes I'm in the sand box away from my family in a war zone tyring to better my family. and there are many soldiers and airman over here making much less than I. So they should no have no right to our hobby ANY one that wants to enjoy our hobby should have that right. even if it is on a small scale. The whole point I was getting at our hobby one which I would like to pass down to my children one day is that the prices are getting unreal Now put your self in the shoes of one like us and let some one tell you that a hobby you have enjoyed all your life you now have to give up Becouse you are on the lower end of the pay scale Your turn Ray or just email me and we will not keep up this in the form
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Thursday, June 2, 2005 10:56 AM
Yup prices are arguably up. I'm currently paging through my bound sets of MRR from 73 and 74 and will get back to y'all on what I find out.

I think there is something to be said again on expenses we have that were not around way back then (even including the early 90's). Cell phones (how many families have several of these things?), cable and satellite TV, internet connection, pc etc etc. I look at some of my neighbors. At least 4 cell phones. Satellite TV. High speed internet. New computer every year. Eating out much more (I think the gov't figures people are spending twice as much eating out as a percentage of income then as little as 10 years ago). Four cars for 3 licensed drivers. How much of this is a necessity? How much of a chunk do these things take as a percentage of income? How much could be spent on a hobby if one were to use only half of what all these things cost?

Just a thought.
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: New Brighton, MN
  • 4,393 posts
Posted by ARTHILL on Thursday, June 2, 2005 11:15 AM
I'm also a golfer. Have you checked the price of drivers lately? I'm just back in HO after 25 years and I bought everything I needed for the best layout I ever build for way less % of my yearly salery than I paid in 70's and got MUCH nicer stuff. I have been to some flea markets and Athern for $5.00 was everywhere.

If you think you have it right, your standards are too low. my photos http://s12.photobucket.com/albums/a235/ARTHILL/ Art
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • 1,138 posts
Posted by MidlandPacific on Thursday, June 2, 2005 11:28 AM
We had this discussion before, and I did a bit of research on the Commerce Department website. Bottom line: I think the hobby is probably cheaper nowadays. You can follow the link to read my reasoning, complete with pseudo-statistics.

Thanks for the job you're doing over there -

Rob

http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?page=-1&TOPIC_ID=34671&REPLY_ID=351110#351110

http://mprailway.blogspot.com

"The first transition era - wood to steel!"

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Thursday, June 2, 2005 11:48 AM
Ah, Jetrock, it's always somebody ELSE to blame, isn't it? If a person can't do or afford something, look around for someone to blame, never look in the mirror. Those nasty bosses always have us by the shorts, don't they?

Sorry, it isn't my way of thinking. As I said above, WE should all take responsibility for what WE chose to do or afford in our lives. Don't like the wages at Walmart? Don't work for them. Find work elsewhere that will pay you what you think you're worth. If you don't have a marketable skill that society values, too darned bad. Take the $6/hour. If you really are sick of that merry-go-round, then make yourself more 'valuable'. Become something that society values more, such as a plumber, electrician, computer repair tech, doctor, professor, or a teacher. I wouldn't whine that the bad boss prevented li'l ol' me, the good guy, from doing anything I darned well set my mind to.

Isn't that the great American way and philosophy? Opportunity for all? It didn't say you hafta work for an indifferent boss and take it. And then lament about the affordability of a luxury in any person's life, toy trains.

I aplogize in advance if my tone is hostile or offensive, Jet. I just do not buy the 'everybody else is wrong, nasty, predatory, mean, greedy....and I am just downtrodden 'cuz I don't got trains." crud.

Respectfully, always,

-Crandell
  • Member since
    November 2014
  • 595 posts
Posted by gvdobler on Thursday, June 2, 2005 2:04 PM
Why is everyone stuck on 1970-80 pricing.

In 1981 I paid $76,000 for a new airplane that goes for about $450,000 new today.
I bought a new Cadilac for about $17,000, today about $48,000.
I bought a new house for about $115,00, today about $450,000.

None of those prices are coming back.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Thursday, June 2, 2005 2:36 PM
Perhaps everyone is stuck on 1970-80 prices the same way my dad and those of his generation was fixated on prices from the 40's and 50's.

Wouldn't it be cool if those prices came back but salaries stayed the same!!
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Thursday, June 2, 2005 2:55 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by JJUrich

Were do you get OFF telling people that they should not have a hobby ! Yes I'm in the sand box away from my family in a war zone tyring to better my family. and there are many soldiers and airman over here making much less than I. So they should no have no right to our hobby ANY one that wants to enjoy our hobby should have that right. even if it is on a small scale. The whole point I was getting at our hobby one which I would like to pass down to my children one day is that the prices are getting unreal Now put your self in the shoes of one like us and let some one tell you that a hobby you have enjoyed all your life you now have to give up Becouse you are on the lower end of the pay scale Your turn Ray or just email me and we will not keep up this in the form


You're missing the point: this is the United States of America, where people think differently than the run of the mill peasant. We have NO entitlements to anything but, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. No one 'owes" us anything, just as we own no one anything in return. You want respect? EARN it. You want to have a nice house and hobbies? EARN them.

Inflation has made the hobby look expensive, and it is, relative to the days when a family of six could live the suburban dream on a single blue collar paycheck. Guess what? Them days GONE. Now two relatively high-paying white collar paychecks can barely make ends meet these days in some areas.

SHOULD people have hobbies? No, not if they can barely scrape together $20 a month for it, or are barely keeping their families fed. Do people have a RIGHT to a hobby? No, but neither do they NOT have a right to a hobby. If you can swing it without letting the important stuff slide, go for it.

And when I was a starving E5 back in the 1980s, I had the money for a hobby. I didn't in college afterwards, did when I was single and making money, didn't when I was first married, and do again now that life's on a roll again. I've been in the hobby all my life, and have learned how to "make do". I scratchbuilt my first freight cars when I was nine, and still do occasionally today. I just don't spend money on the hobby when I don't have it.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!