Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Dateless Mantua 2-6-2T Conversion (Eventually)

10617 views
50 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Sunday, October 18, 2020 12:43 PM

Overmod
If you have a longer and more complete version, please post its URL here.  I had ridiculous trouble tracking down even the 'legacy' old-catalogue version.  This is too precious a resource to be MIA while the 'new ownership' gets its new Web presentation together...

Upon examination, they might be pretty similar documents. This one is labeled 1.4 while yours is labled 1.2, but both have a publishing date of 1/1/2017.

https://nebula.wsimg.com/9efc443e6b1c221c97ebd56248a29065?AccessKeyId=08BEE66B97B387F20C0D&disposition=0&alloworigin=1

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, October 18, 2020 11:53 AM

SpaceMouse
That document was part of the document I found.

If you have a longer and more complete version, please post its URL here.  I had ridiculous trouble tracking down even the 'legacy' old-catalogue version.  This is too precious a resource to be MIA while the 'new ownership' gets its new Web presentation together...

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Sunday, October 18, 2020 10:11 AM

Overmod

Why this is so hard to find is strange.  I assume you got it through the 'old catalog'; the date on the document matches:

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0250/4032/2669/files/Gears_1_2.pdf?263

 

That document was part of the document I found. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, October 17, 2020 8:31 AM

Why this is so hard to find is strange.  I assume you got it through the 'old catalog'; the date on the document matches:

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0250/4032/2669/files/Gears_1_2.pdf?263

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Saturday, October 17, 2020 6:27 AM

richg1998
NWSL describes them in Gear Planning page. A great resource you should download.

I'm not sure I got the right paper. I downloaded "QUALITY GEARS FOR MODEL BUILDERS, TINKERERS, Etc." published 1/1/2017.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Friday, October 16, 2020 12:48 PM

SpaceMouse

 

richg1998
The MDC intermidiate gear box is wonderful. I have made my own. A 72 to 1 for a switcher with a can motor with a flywheel is excellent. Motor mounted in bath caulk for no vibration.

 

What I thought was a simple engineering problem has become infinitely more complex. 

What is an MDC gearbox? I assume you are using a series of gears to provide low-end precision, but in the DCC world, what does that accomplish that a CV setting or two wouldn't. 

What does a flywheel do other than provide momentum? 

I was planning on mounting my engine in caulk, but I first have to build some kind of structure to hold the smaller motor at the right distance and angle.  

 

I found more gear reduction. I built two of my own. Your MDC locos have them.

Also allows the motor to be horizontal, not at an angle.

NWSL describes them in Gear Planning page. A great resource you should download.

I bought it when thet were still in Washington years ago.

All my newer Roundhouse locos came with them and open frame skewed armature motors with flywheels.

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, October 16, 2020 11:41 AM

Good. Everything I'm doing here will be first time, with the exception of the decoder install. I'm sure I'll have plenty of challenges. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, October 16, 2020 2:25 AM

SpaceMouse
Is there any reason not to proceed with just the new motor and pickups on insulated wheels on the pilot and training wheels,

No.

If it isn't 'adequate' you can always cut the caulk mount, modify things, and do more later.

That also applies if you get the new motor in and find you need or want additional 'fine tuning' on the chassis, or bearings, or rod bushings or whatever.  In my opinion at least it's not much time, and not much cost, to rework at any later time...

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, October 15, 2020 10:47 PM

Is there any reason not to proceed with just the new motor and pickups on insulated wheels on the pilot and training wheels, or should I be considering more sophisticated modifications at this point?

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, October 15, 2020 11:20 AM

SpaceMouse
What is an MDC gearbox?

I presumed it was something initially made by the Model Die Casting company, perhaps rebushed and with better tooth profile gears that have less lash.  I'm as interested as you to find out what was done and how it was accomplished.

I assume you are using a series of gears to provide low-end precision, but in the DCC world, what does that accomplish that a CV setting or two wouldn't?

This is like what gearhead motors do: the greater the 'mechanical advantage' of the geartrain, the smoother a given electric motor with 'poles' will run -- even if it is a coreless or BLDC motor with inherent smooth torque over a revolution.  If you refer to the original article in MR circa 1970 which used a coreless motor driving through a Delrin chain, you will find the same principle of smooth ratio reduction (and torque 'multiplication' if that is important to the situation) over a scale speed range.

Note that there is another consideration: whether the gears or their arrangement cause prompt stopping when the motor changes speed or stops, as in a typical worm-drive setup.  There some kind of electronic 'momentum control' becomes essential to smooth operation, and being able to fine-tune the motor's 'response' via CVs becomes highly valuable.

What does a flywheel do other than provide momentum?

In the olden crude days it provided an effect like 'momentum' for speed changes that weren't jerky, or to overcome the effects of momentary dropout.  In a modern DCC locomotive, I think the important effect is to smooth the motor response between 'poles' in the armature, where the motor controller in the decoder is using something relatively crude like back EMF to do speed control and 'cogging' might be more evident at slow speeds where relatively coarse PWM is being applied to a motor with strong 'supermagnet' field strength and relatively few armature poles.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, October 15, 2020 10:59 AM

richg1998
The MDC intermidiate gear box is wonderful. I have made my own. A 72 to 1 for a switcher with a can motor with a flywheel is excellent. Motor mounted in bath caulk for no vibration.

What I thought was a simple engineering problem has become infinitely more complex. 

What is an MDC gearbox? I assume you are using a series of gears to provide low-end precision, but in the DCC world, what does that accomplish that a CV setting or two wouldn't. 

What does a flywheel do other than provide momentum? 

I was planning on mounting my engine in caulk, but I first have to build some kind of structure to hold the smaller motor at the right distance and angle.  

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, October 14, 2020 10:09 PM

I just dragged out my full color Mantua catalogs from the middle to late 1990's and they show replacement motors. I had bought one for my General and Mantua sent me beautiful catalogs with all parts list. MC-90, MC,94, MC98. Motors with brackets. Not sure you will ever find them again.

Kits, trains sets, all kinds of locomotives, parts, incredible.

NWSL has all kinds of gears and motors, adapters also. I have used many.

The MDC intermidiate gear box is wonderful. I have made my own. A 72 to 1 for a switcher with a can motor with a flywheel is excellent. Motor mounted in bath caulk for no vibration.

 I thought I scanned the catalog and sent them in years ago to HO Seeker,

Rich

 

 

 

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, October 14, 2020 9:42 AM

Overmod
 
SpaceMouse
I'm trying to build something that will not be out of place in 1895.

 https://www.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/26/NZ_6.jpg

 

That would work, but it's a little showy. Randall "Rock" Ridge couldn't handle all the style points.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, October 14, 2020 2:09 AM

SpaceMouse
I'm trying to build something that will not be out of place in 1895.

Like this, perhaps? Devil

https://www.irsociety.co.uk/Archives/26/NZ_6.jpg

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, October 14, 2020 12:38 AM

The motor I ordered from China arrived today and I found two things I could not believe. 

1) That I got it so soon. It was supposed to arrive between Oct. 26 and Nov. 18th.

2) It is half the size of the original motor. It's like replacing a Chevy straight six with a Hyundai V4.

This week I had to replace a 2-6-0 tender truck that got damaged. They have wheels isolated from one another and I belive I can power the motor with pick-ups on both sides of the pilot and trailing wheels. Basically, I'm set to make the bash.

However, I now have 3 locomotives on the bench ahead of it, so it will be a while before I even look at it.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, October 7, 2020 12:57 PM

Dan
And then there were a few diesel or gas powered  locomotives that the home shops made from steam engine chassis...

I'm trying to build something that will not be out of place in 1895.

Randy
Not sure how practical it would be to make something that tiny that could actually pull more than itself around, even if it was made all of metal.

I was thinking 2 powered trucks and weight added to the chassis. I would put it in the mill yard moving one box car at a time. The most it might have to do is move 4 cars on flat ground. The boiler would be for electronics. 

Simon
Chip, I thought you were going more in this direction (Bachmann ON30 2-6-2t):

Two seperate projects. The 2-6-2T would come first.

 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 2,775 posts
Posted by snjroy on Wednesday, October 7, 2020 10:58 AM

SpaceMouse

 

 

 

Now THAT is a cute Heisler!

 

Chip, I thought you were going more in this direction (Bachmann ON30 2-6-2t):

https://shop.bachmanntrains.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=487_673_1129&products_id=7112&zenid=aaeklcfngu85l20icaabrder46

Simon

 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, October 7, 2020 8:39 AM

 OK, I would take a working model of that Lake Shore Stone loco in a heartbeat. Not sure how practical it would be to make something that tiny that could actually pull more than itself around, even if it was made all of metal. The boiler would almost have to be the motor.

                                                             --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    August 2020
  • 581 posts
Posted by Southgate 2 on Wednesday, October 7, 2020 1:57 AM

That's one idea. And then there were a few diesel or gas powered  locomotives that the home shops made from steam engine chassis...

https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.7zKIaFhh9jM3tyJNiPi9yQHaDm?pid=Api&rs=1

https://searcharchives.vancouver.ca/uploads/r/null/9/2/923427/6dc01636-5364-4be9-9e7e-4c6119973bdc-A28539.jpg

Dan

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Tuesday, October 6, 2020 11:52 PM

More like the small home-made looking engines on the narrow gauge layouts. 

This is not a great example. 

I was thinking more like two trucks. Okay maybe like the Climax or a Bell or a small early Heisler. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Tuesday, October 6, 2020 9:27 PM

SpaceMouse
Is there any reason I couldn't make an old jalopy geared engine by using powered trucks and maybe building the boiler and cab myself?

That is very possible. Are you talking about building a model simlar to the old Roundhouse Climax?

-Kevin

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Tuesday, October 6, 2020 6:51 PM

Off TopicOff TopicOff Topic

More like a tangent really. 

Is there any reason I couldn't make an old jalopy geared engine by using powered trucks and maybe building the boiler and cab myself?

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, October 2, 2020 7:33 PM

Simon
1. make sure the motor you use has the same axle diameter as the worm gear(whether you use a new NWSL worm gear or the original plastic one)

I got one that came with a worm gear. Another listing with the same motor said that it was specifically for repowering locomotives (and charged 5 times as much.)

But I know it's a crapshoot that the gears mesh. 

2. as I said, all the wheels on the engine can only pickup power from one side, or else it will short the engine out. Make sure the leading/trailing/3 main drivers are all in the right polarity. If you want the engine to pickup from both sides of the track, you can install isolated wipers on the insulated wheels. Buying wheels that pickup power from both sides of the track is really counter intuative. 

I was hoping there was such a thing as picking up power from the axle with an isolation gap in the center. Haven't started looking for such a thing yet.

snjroy

Chip, that is quite the project... You will problably need to change the pilot and trailing wheels (I think they are plastic), and isolate these trucks from the frame if you get rid of the tender. Not an impossible task. It might be a challenge to find room for a decoder in that tiny engine though.

The plan is to wire a harness and push it through a hole in the boiler into the new side tank. The bottom will be removable with screws and I'll fit the decoder and speaker in there. 

I know that it's not an option for you, but I was looking at the picture of the 2-6-2T, and I was wondering if someone ever tried to convert the Mantua 2-6-6-2T into a 2-6-2T. The same challenges would apply with respect to power pickup, but the engine is a bit bigger and the body is easier to adapt. I actually did the opposite, I added a tender to my 2-6-6-2T for added pickup. Runs better than my 2-6-2...

Simon

We'll see how this one comes out. I might start building custom traction out of the small diesel frames I have.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 2,775 posts
Posted by snjroy on Friday, October 2, 2020 10:12 AM

Chip, that is quite the project... You will problably need to change the pilot and trailing wheels (I think they are plastic), and isolate these trucks from the frame if you get rid of the tender. Not an impossible task. It might be a challenge to find room for a decoder in that tiny engine though. 

I know that it's not an option for you, but I was looking at the picture of the 2-6-2T, and I was wondering if someone ever tried to convert the Mantua 2-6-6-2T into a 2-6-2T. The same challenges would apply with respect to power pickup, but the engine is a bit bigger and the body is easier to adapt. I actually did the opposite, I added a tender to my 2-6-6-2T for added pickup. Runs better than my 2-6-2...

Simon

  • Member since
    May 2014
  • From: Pennsylvania
  • 1,154 posts
Posted by Trainman440 on Friday, October 2, 2020 10:08 AM

1. make sure the motor you use has the same axle diameter as the worm gear(whether you use a new NWSL worm gear or the original plastic one)

2. as I said, all the wheels on the engine can only pickup power from one side, or else it will short the engine out. Make sure the leading/trailing/3 main drivers are all in the right polarity. If you want the engine to pickup from both sides of the track, you can install isolated wipers on the insulated wheels. Buying wheels that pickup power from both sides of the track is really counter intuative. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modeling the PRR & NYC in HO

Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/@trainman440

Instagram (where I share projects!): https://www.instagram.com/trainman440

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, October 2, 2020 5:45 AM

Trainman440
That's odd, power pickup on that engine should be very simple. Make sure that only one side of the wheels are picking up power on the engine(including non drivers), and only one side of the wheels are picking up power from the tender. 

There was caked on crud on both the pilot and trailer wheels. I'm going to clean them up and see if I can get it working.

I've ordered an FK-130 from China so I should have it by Christmas. In the meantime, I'll look for wheels that can pick up power from both sides of track.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    May 2014
  • From: Pennsylvania
  • 1,154 posts
Posted by Trainman440 on Thursday, October 1, 2020 6:15 PM

That's odd, power pickup on that engine should be very simple. Make sure that only one side of the wheels are picking up power on the engine(including non drivers), and only one side of the wheels are picking up power from the tender. 

-------------------

You got a few option for remotoring the engine.

1. Mantua used to sell some can motor upgrades, these go for $$$ on ebay these days. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Factory-Mantua-Mc-94-Can-Motor-Wired-For-DCC-Or-DC-Tyco-Mikado-2-8-2-Pacific/324304050572?hash=item4b8207198c:g:VaIAAOSwkold87yd

2. You can do a manual motor replacement. Terrifyintexas7, a member who used to be on here, upgraded all his mantua engines to can motors. Basically find any can motor on ebay that fits, and use silicon glue to mount it in place. There are literally thousands of motors to choose from, the common one people use (bachmann engines used these for a period of time is the FK-130 motor. These go for like $2 per. 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Original-Japan-MABUCHI-FK-130SH-Motor-for-Four-wheel-Car-drive-Robot-DIY-Hobby/302488988022?epid=0&hash=item466dbfa976:g:zrQAAOSwEnlZ43Mr

Here's his channel, although he's sort of dropped off the face of the earth. But he's done a LOT of remotors and decoder wiring. You could probably get in contact with him for help. 

https://www.youtube.com/user/TerryinTexas7/videos

3. Last option, and probably the best overall, would be to replace the gears and motor with NWSL gears and motor. Conveniently, they have a kit just for you: 

https://nwsl.com/products/repower-kit-tyco-mantua-0-6-0

It includes motor, motor mount, drive gear and worm gear to make your engine run a whole lot better. While I haven't bought this set yet, I do plan to get it someday to upgrade my Mantua 0-4-0. 

Good luck!

Charles

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modeling the PRR & NYC in HO

Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/@trainman440

Instagram (where I share projects!): https://www.instagram.com/trainman440

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, October 1, 2020 5:20 PM

Engine works but whines and moans. Doesn't start moving until power is about 20%.

It didn't run by fixing the broken wire to the tender. Upon examination after I pulled it apart, the pilot and trailing wheels seem to be the source of power in the engine and they were cruddy.

No can. And it only got it to turn when I clipped the transformer leads right to the engine. 

  Yeah, the motor ran, but only when I hooked the power directly to it.

SpaceMouse
Anyway, their company owned railroad was the California Western and the backbone of their fleet was 2-6-2Ts. The Rock Ridge RR is kinda sorta based on the California Western. The CW just came to the SP mainline about 12 years after the date of my layout.

I've thought long and hard about bashing a 2-6-2T.

 

So here's the plan as I see it. 

Get a can motor and make it work.

Isolate the pilot and trailer and use them for both pick-ups. 

Wire an 8-pin harness that feeds through a hole in the body, changing out the headlamp with an LED and adding a rear light.

Build side tank, leaving the bottom removeable and store decoder, keep alive, and speaker in the tank.

Paint and decal. Add details.

Now, where the heck will I find the right can motor for this thing, and where do I get wheels that are isolated side to side?

 

Look, I know this loco is 12 years to young for my layout, but with the coolness factor of a 2-6-2T, I might let it stay. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Tuesday, September 29, 2020 10:49 PM

wjstix
Northern Pacific ran 2-6-2 engines into the 1950's, they were fairly common around Duluth/ Superior for example. They were powerful enough that in the early 20th century NP even used them on iron ore trains.

My lumber mill is based on the Union Lumber Company in Ft. Bragg. Their operation looked like this. Be sure to click and scroll.

Anyway, their company owned railroad was the California Western and the backbone of their fleet was 2-6-2Ts. The RRRR is kinda sorta based on the California Western. The CW just came to the SP mainline about 12 years after the date of my layout.

I've thought long and hard about bashing a 2-6-2T.

wjstix
Later Mantua engines (staring c.1988) used a Sagami can motors, and offered a retrofit kit to add the can motor to their earlier engines. Even if you can't find that kit, I suspect the can motor is still being made(?) As noted, you do have to isolate it from the chassis but that isn't hard. Just need some electrical or other tape and a plastic/nylon 2-56 screw.

I'll no doubt be into this thing soon. I'll see what's in there. I keep nylon 2-56 screws in stock.

wjstix
These Mantua engines, like most steam engines from 'the olden days', only picked up power on the drivers on one rail, and from the tender wheels on the other rail, so they are a good candidate for a decoder with some type of "keep alive" to they can keep going through turnouts or crossings.

The dead zone in my turnouts is about 1 3/8". If I put wipers on both tender axels, it might solve that problem. We'll see.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!