Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

F3A Speed Tests - Intermountain vs. Athearn Genesis

5935 views
47 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 4, 2015 7:42 PM

Would it be possible to aquire a higher speed motor of similar size?  If this was a larger locomotive I would suggest a possible step up gearing (add a large gear on motor shaft, meshing with a small gear on the worm shaft) to give an increase in speed, but I doubt you have space in an IM F unit for that.  My guess is IM assumes most customers will either run on layouts in a smaller space or run freights with Fs.

And a similar experiance with unsatisfactory top speeds:

I was at a hobby shop near Boston, MA a couple years ago and was looking at buying a Bachmann Spectrum J.  Fortuneately for me the guy working the HO scale counter (they have separate counters for different scales, have to segregate the 3 rail folks from 2 rail, otherwise you end up with arguments and name calling!) volunteered to run it on their 10ft test track.  Time from one end to the other: >20 sec at max throttle setting.  He could tell that I was no longer interested in purchasing it and boxed it back up and set it in a cardboard box on the floor behind the counter for shipment back to Bachmann. 

Edit: NWSL has one that spins at 12,500rpm.  Dont know what IM uses.  Available on walthers for $25. 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Friday, December 4, 2015 4:37 AM

I spoke to a technician at Intermountain yesterday about the scale speed issue with my F3 locos.  He ruled out the decoder or the motor as the cause.  He did agree that turning off BEMF would help a little, but felt that the gear ratio was the source of the "problem".  However, he did not feel that the gear ratio was a problem in general, and he indicated that changing out the gears would not be practical or even recommended.  

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 8:12 PM

rrinker

 That's pretty odd though that the Genesis on DC ran SLOWER than on DCC. But the Genesis were close, even with a decoder, to the DC version, and the Intermountain is way off. Unless the Intermountains have CV5 set to non-zero to limit top speed.

                       --Randy

 

 

??????

My Genesis F units ran 80 smph at only 13.3 volts pulse modulated DC.

Rich tested his DCC Genesis unit at 79 smph.

    

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 8:01 PM

 That's pretty odd though that the Genesis on DC ran SLOWER than on DCC. But the Genesis were close, even with a decoder, to the DC version, and the Intermountain is way off. Unless the Intermountains have CV5 set to non-zero to limit top speed.

                       --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 7:50 PM

Rich,

DC speed test results.

Conditions:

Straight level track - somewhat dirty

Aristo Train Engineer throttle - set to pulse width modulation mode

Input voltage to Train Engineer Throttle - 13.8 filtered/regulated DC

Max voltage at rails under load - all test subjects - 13.2 to 13.4 volts

Locos running free - no cars

All units a straight DC with no decoders. All have factory lighting circuit boards.

RESULTS:

Intermountain F3 - several different locos - 75 smph

Genesis F7 - several different locos - 80 smph

Intermountain FP7 (newer producton than the F3's tested) - 72 smph

Early Proto E8 - 83 smph

Early Proto FA1 - 72 smph

Notes:

The Intermountain and Genesis units ran well MU'd together averaging out their speed at about 75-77 smph.

Keep in mind, most "normal" DC power packs put out higher voltages than my regulated 13.8 volt power supplies.

All locos were given some warm up time and multiple tests, but they have been sitting in my train room which is only heated when I go up there - above my detached garage.

Ambient temperature during tests, about 60 degrees.

Since 12 volts is still considered the full throttle minimum standard for DC, all of these models reached reasonable fulll throttle speeds, even if they did not match prototype maximum speeds exactly.

I'm sure another volt or two would push them all to the 90-100 smph range.

Still sounds like a decoder problem to me.

Personally I like the idea of the full throttle setting being somewhere close to the expected full speed you would actually use - it allows the full range of the throttle to come into play while operating the loco.

Sheldon 

    

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 7:41 PM

zstripe
I still have a couple Athearn Hi-F drive A's laying around, that will accept Your shells.....they are good for a good 200+SMPH...

I think my daughter's will top that. Smile Made for a Youth in Model Railroading locomotive drag race.  We put in a high speed slot car motor and added thicker drive shafts so the "gear" ratio is reduced. It could have run the track 4 times, while a Hustler with standard motor and rubber band drive (my son's entry) was doing it once.

Seriously, while not mentioned in the locomotives being compared on this thread, I've been disappointed with Walthers Proto line and their "standard" 14:1 gear ratio for passenger trains.  I get about 79 mph out of then.  Totally unacceptable for the Super Chief, El Capitan, their tribesmen, not to mention the Empire Builder and Hiawatha.  sigh.  Granted most people don't have the space for those speeds but we try to be prototypical in everything else.

 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 4:39 PM

Sheldon, I will be most interested in your results.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 3:20 PM

I will try to run a speed test on my DC versions tonight - my max track voltage is 13.8, filtered DC.

If I recall, mine do run faster than 50 smph at my 13.8 volts.

And I have both Genesis and Intermountain units handy to test......as well as a measured length of track and a stop watch.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 2:58 PM

I still have a couple Athearn Hi-F drive A's laying around, that will accept Your shells.....they are good for a good 200+SMPH...Smile, Wink & Grin

Hi-F drive, AKA rubber band drive.

Take Care! Big Smile

Frank

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,243 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 2:10 PM

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 1:09 PM

Yes, IM probably considers them freight locos, so 50 is good for a model, even though the real things were likely geared to around 65 for freight use. According to one source, the max gearing was good to 102, the slowest version allowed a speed of 50mph, with a LOT higher tractive effort than the 102mph gearing, although it also said the most common options were between those extremes.

                   --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 10:59 AM

rrinker

Try turning the BEMF off on the DZ143, it will probably be closer to the other Intermountain - Digitrax seems to 'reserve' a bit of power at full throttle so that there's more to give if the loco slows down with a heavier load. With BEMF off, full throttle will really be full throttle. 

Randy, great suggestion. Turning off the BEMF shaved 25 seconds off the run around the 180 foot mainline.  Cut it down from 3:29 to 3:04, nearly indentical to the IM with QSI decoder.  CV57 was set to a value of 6, and I cleared it to zero.
 
Incidentally, the Genesis F3A with the Tsunami decoder makes it around the layout in 2:15.
 
Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,849 posts
Posted by maxman on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 8:35 AM

I did a bunch of speed matching for a fiend friend, including Atlas and Athearn locos, and found that the Atlas units were about 85 smph while the Athearns frequently topped 100.  I'm sure that different motors/gearing can make a difference.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 8:23 AM

 Have to fit an Athearn motor to an Intermountain or vice versa to see if it's just motor RPM differences. More likely the gear ratios are different though. As long as the motor doesn;t draw more current than the decoder can supply, it doesn;t matter if it's a 1 amp decoder or a 3 amp decoder. That would make no speed different at all. Try turning the BEMF off on the DZ143, it will probbaly be closer to the other Intermountain - Digitrax seems to 'reserve' a bit of power at full throttle so that there's more to give if the loco slows down with a heavier load. With BEMF off, full throttle will really be full throttle. Like the Proto E units, not fixable without replacing the gearing. A different decoder would only change the speed a couple of mph either way, not magically make one that goes 51mph suddenly go 90.

                  --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 8:19 AM

One of my buddies wondered if the IM F3A locos are set up for freight operation, not passenger operation.  Could that be?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Heart of Georgia
  • 5,406 posts
Posted by Doughless on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 8:17 AM

Any chance that you can pop out the decoders and temporarily direct wire the truck wires to the motor leads and test them on DC?  At least you'd know that the same amount of current was getting to each motor.

- Douglas

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 8:07 AM

rrinker

 Decoder differences between the two Intermountains. Different gear ratio than the Athearn, or just different motor speed.

50mph is plenty fast for a freight train.

                  --Randy

 

So, which is it?   Different gear ratios?  Different motor speed?  Is the 1 amp Z scale decoder to blame?  

50 MPH scale speed for an F3A passenger loco seems way too slow.  

Top speed on the real thing was 100 MPH.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 8:03 AM

 Decoder differences between the two Intermountains. Different gear ratio than the Athearn, or just different motor speed.

50mph is plenty fast for a freight train.

                  --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
F3A Speed Tests - Intermountain vs. Athearn Genesis
Posted by richhotrain on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 7:57 AM

I think that my Intermountain F3A locos run rtoo slow.  Not sure if it is the chassis, the gear ratio, or the decoder.  So, I ran some speed tests.  Here are the results.

Intermountain F3A - After market decoder, Digitrax DZ143PS.  51 MPH.

Intermountain F3A - Factory installed decoder, QSI.  58 MPH.

Athearn Genesis F3A - Factory installed decoder, Tsunami.  79 MPH.

Thoughts?

Rich

Alton Junction

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!