Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Kadee #119 SE type coupling

3836 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Cambridge U.K.
  • 246 posts
Kadee #119 SE type coupling
Posted by CPPedler on Sunday, October 18, 2015 3:24 PM

Hello everyone,

Can anyone explain where the Kadee #119 SE coupling is used . As far as I understand it, the #118 SF is used on tank cars but not sure where the SE is used.

Thanks in advance. Colin       UK

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by JoeinPA on Sunday, October 18, 2015 3:43 PM

Colin:

It looks like both are shelf type couplers. The 118 is a "standard size" Kadee while the 119 is the smaller "scale size" coupler. Some prefer the 119 as it is a little closer to prototypical in size.

Joe

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Sunday, October 18, 2015 4:37 PM

I cut over to #119 Shelf couplers on my Daylight passenger cars two years ago.  I wasn’t having a lot of false uncouples but the #119 stops it!
 
I was having problems between my E7s. My E7s are power houses, Athearn SD40-2 frames with heavy Cary cast metal shells.  Each locomotive weighs in at 2½ pounds or more and has tremendous drawbar pull.  I went with the larger #118 because they look stronger than the #119. 
 
 
I have three pairs of Athearn powered E7A/Bs and operate them in DC mode.  I balanced all of my DC mode E7s very close but constant reversal operations results in uncoupling with the standard Kadee, the #118s took care of that.
 
Both versions work very well with Kadee uncouplers, they’re a bugger to uncouple by hand.  At a creep they will uncouple moving over the Kadee 309 electric uncoupler when you apply power to the uncoupler.  A sudden shot of magnetism is enough to kick the couplers apart with the locomotive moving as long as it’s not on an uphill grade.
 
I also have three pairs of Model Power E7A/Bs and I use the #118 on them too.  I remotored the Model Power locomotives with Canon dual shaft EN22D motors and run them in DCC mode. I didn't have a problem with the Model Powers uncoupling but I converted them to #118 too.
 
All my steam fleet and freight rolling stock use the standard Kadee #5.
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 2,844 posts
Posted by dinwitty on Tuesday, October 20, 2015 9:44 PM
locomotives that may be more semi-permanently for me I'll use the SE couplers, and use on passenger cars if they start giving me uncoupling problems. If I use the scale coupler I need 2 of them on both mounting as they will still uncouple if used singly. The bigger SE is fine on a standard 5 Kadee knuckle to hold them coupled. I am finding myself installing the SE's on steamers.
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,455 posts
Posted by wp8thsub on Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:27 PM

The type SE is more common on tank cars than the SF.  Some tank cars, mostly built before about 1978, that were originally built with type F couplers, were retrofitted with type SF.  Some could get them when new.  Most tank cars before the rules changed were built to use type E, and were thus retorfitted with type SE.  Hazmat tank cars built from around 1978 were typically equipped with type SE from the start.

Rob Spangler

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!