Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

What is the best HO track cleaning car

14041 views
20 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 618 posts
What is the best HO track cleaning car
Posted by DAVID FORTNEY on Thursday, July 30, 2015 8:00 PM

Are they any good? What should you use with them, alcohol, etc.

thanks,

dave

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Thursday, July 30, 2015 8:21 PM

There is no best. Only what you like best. Some use cars. Some do it manually with different cleaning products, including 2B graphite sticks.

Our club uses a couple John Allen cars for track cleaning.

Rich

 

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: NW Pa Snow-belt.
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by ricktrains4824 on Thursday, July 30, 2015 10:58 PM

Hard to define "best" here....

My track cleaning consist contains 3 different kinds: CMX car, (run with 90% isopropyl [aka "rubbing"] alcohol), a centerline car, (ran dry), and a slider car, (also dry, mine is cratex based, but Masonite would also work here.). 

When I really need to clean track, where it gets really bad, I use a WS Tidy-track track cleaner set, run with cloth pads wet with the same 90% isopropyl. (I have never used the tidy-track "rescue" pads, but they are also cratex pads.)

There are cleaners and solvents that work better/quicker than isopropyl, but due too health issues I avoid them. (Asthma.) They would include things such as acetone, laquer thinner, etc... (If you use them do not get them on plastic ties..... They will melt the plastic. They also have stronger fumes, thereby the reason I avoid them... However, if the CMX is used, and adjusted correctly, you should have very little smell.) 

Ricky W.

HO scale Proto-freelancer.

My Railroad rules:

1: It's my railroad, my rules.

2: It's for having fun and enjoyment.

3: Any objections, consult above rules.

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,257 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Friday, July 31, 2015 2:36 AM
I certainly wouldn’t necessarily say they’re the best, but the John Allen cars work well for my associates.
Cheers, the Bear.

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: North Dakota
  • 9,592 posts
Posted by BroadwayLion on Friday, July 31, 2015 6:54 AM

Clean Tracks?

Have you ever looked at subway tracks. Sure trains run by every three minutes, but clean, muck is clsoer to the mark.

But LION really spends little time cleaning the tracks. The oxides that form on Nickle-Silver rails are conductive, so why bust your budget over them.

Besides, trains of LION have 48 wheel power pickup, him bothers not to even wire some of the crossovers at all. Just like the prototype.

ROAR

 

The Route of the Broadway Lion The Largest Subway Layout in North Dakota.

Here there be cats.                                LIONS with CAMERAS

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Friday, July 31, 2015 7:29 AM

I agree with Rich!

richg1998

There is no best. Only what you like best. Some use cars. Some do it manually with different cleaning products, including 2B graphite sticks.

 

Rich

 

 

I have tried many cleaning cars over my 50 + years of model railroading and all have worked to some level.  For the last 8 years I’ve been using and very happy with a CMX tank car with ACT-6006 Track & Rail Cleaner behind my locomotive then a dozen or so freight cars followed by an Athearn bay-window caboose with a weighted mop up pad mounted between the trucks.
 
A couple of laps with the above configuration around my layout once a month works fine for me.  Bakersfield CA has a terrible crud falling out of the sky on everything in sight 24/7 and that takes care of my track.
 
 
 
Simple and works GREAT for me!
 
Mel
 
 
Modeling the SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: NW Pa Snow-belt.
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by ricktrains4824 on Friday, July 31, 2015 9:59 PM

Mel,

The ACT-6006, does it have a strong smell? I have heard good things about them, but was curious as to fumes/smell..... As per my above post.

Ricky W.

HO scale Proto-freelancer.

My Railroad rules:

1: It's my railroad, my rules.

2: It's for having fun and enjoyment.

3: Any objections, consult above rules.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Friday, July 31, 2015 10:38 PM

ricktrains4824

Mel,

The ACT-6006, does it have a strong smell? I have heard good things about them, but was curious as to fumes/smell..... As per my above post.

 

If anyone can detect an odor from ACT-6006 they have a better nose than I do.  If ACT-6006 has an odor I’ve never noticed it.
 
I opened a bottle and asked my wife to take a whiff and she said with her nose almost toughing the bottle “a little odor, not very much”.  It sure works on my track, it gets rid of all the dried Bay Area SMOG that ruins the paint jobs on cars here.  
 
 
Mel
 
 
Modeling the SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 561 posts
Posted by TBat55 on Saturday, August 1, 2015 6:47 AM

I recently bought a CMX cleaner car (the $100+ brass one) and tried several fluids.  I found lacquer thinner to be the best for my HO NY cellar DCC layout.  It only takes one pass.

I pull it with a BLI SW7 switcher which is relatively heavy but only 4-axle.  Big problem is the CMX stalls on Atlas rerailers which, of course, I put inside all my tunnels!  Tried less fluid, no effect.  I'm now looking for a stronger pulling loco.

Do not park on top of plastic with lacquer thinner (will partially melt it).

Terry

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, August 1, 2015 9:13 AM

TBat55

I recently bought a CMX cleaner car (the $100+ brass one) and tried several fluids.  I found lacquer thinner to be the best for my HO NY cellar DCC layout.  It only takes one pass.

I pull it with a BLI SW7 switcher which is relatively heavy but only 4-axle.  Big problem is the CMX stalls on Atlas rerailers which, of course, I put inside all my tunnels!  Tried less fluid, no effect.  I'm now looking for a stronger pulling loco.

Do not park on top of plastic with lacquer thinner (will partially melt it).

 

That’s another reason why I use ACT-6006, it cleans very good and doesn’t hurt the track or ballast.  The ACT-6006 liquid evaporates quickly from roads crossing the tracks and doesn’t disturb any glue or scenery.
 
I tow my CMX and mop up caboose with a pair of Athearn SD40-2/Cary Body E7s (2.2 pounds each), anything hanging up has a real problem with their power.  They have done in Kadee couplers several times over the years.
 
I like the idea of rerailers in your tunnels!
 
 
Mel
 
 
Modeling the SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 186 posts
Posted by CandOsteam on Saturday, August 1, 2015 2:57 PM

RR_Mel

 

 
ricktrains4824

Mel,

The ACT-6006, does it have a strong smell? I have heard good things about them, but was curious as to fumes/smell..... As per my above post.

 

 

 

If anyone can detect an odor from ACT-6006 they have a better nose than I do.  If ACT-6006 has an odor I’ve never noticed it.
 
I opened a bottle and asked my wife to take a whiff and she said with her nose almost toughing the bottle “a little odor, not very much”.  It sure works on my track, it gets rid of all the dried Bay Area SMOG that ruins the paint jobs on cars here.  
 
 
Mel
 
 
Modeling the SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 

 

I have used ACT 6006 for 15 years and counting and agree it is the best for my situation (DCC/Sound, in a humidity controlled basement in Indiana).  Only use the stuff once a year, sometimes even longer, to keep everything running/sounding great.  I have a CMX car, but use it maybe every 2 years or so!  Oh well, great car though and I've put wood sides around the tank so it looks like a boxcar.

The real reason I felt compelled to reply is that I lived many years in the Bay Area (San Francisco/Berkeley) and can't believe our smog is making its way all the way south to your neck of the woods. Wink

Don't you mean LA? Smile

Joel

Modeling the C&O New River Subdivision circa 1949 for the fun of it!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 289 posts
Posted by bagal on Saturday, August 1, 2015 5:29 PM

On our club layout we were initially quite meticulous about track cleaning to the point of making sure the track passed the white glove test. However we haven't cleaned the track for several months now and the layout is running better than ever. The other night night I did note that a loco which would normally haul a train up a grade was spinning the wheels. The track appeared clean but thick lines of black came off on the dry wiping cloth. The black however did not seem to affect power pickup.

I am wondering if some cleaning could be counter productive? Perhaps the black is conductive? (but reducing friction hence the spinning). Perhaps using solvent binds the black into a non-conducting layer? Perhaps ultra clean track is not necessary?

Anyway, it will be interesting to see what is need in the coming months.

Bill

 

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Saturday, August 1, 2015 6:07 PM

Over the yrs. I've tried just about every track cleaning car on the Market.. It is in My opinion...the fastest, is the CMX filled with Lacquer thinner and when getting the drip rate correct, You will not smell it and will not damage plastic track parts. I also push it around the tracks, instead of pulling it, with two P2K GP9's or BB SD40-2's, so the machine picks up anything on the tracks before the engines run on it and it goes on the engines wheels and just spreads it around. I will run a dry centerline at times along with it, behind the tank car.....once a year.

Take Care! Big Smile

Frank

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, August 1, 2015 6:23 PM

CandOsteam

 

I have used ACT 6006 for 15 years and counting and agree it is the best for my situation (DCC/Sound, in a humidity controlled basement in Indiana).  Only use the stuff once a year, sometimes even longer, to keep everything running/sounding great.  I have a CMX car, but use it maybe every 2 years or so!  Oh well, great car though and I've put wood sides around the tank so it looks like a boxcar.

The real reason I felt compelled to reply is that I lived many years in the Bay Area (San Francisco/Berkeley) and can't believe our smog is making its way all the way south to your neck of the woods. Wink

Don't you mean LA? Smile

Joel

 

I’m not directing the Bakersfield SMOG problem at you Joel!
 
As you know Bakersfield is located at the southern end of the San Joaquin Valley.  We get a constant 5 to 10 MPH breeze from the North North West bringing the Bay Area SMOG here 24/7.  Bakersfield is only a slight bit up hill from the Bay Area, San Francisco/Berkeley is at sea level and 200 miles to the south Bakersfield is at 400 feet.
 
The San Joaquin Valley has 3000 foot mountains on the West side and 8000 to 14000 foot mountains to the East making a huge funnel exiting up and over the Tehachapi Pass.  Winds from the south (LA) are diverted by the southern 4000 foot mountains, LA SMOG never comes our way.  The 5 to 10 MPH breeze out of the north is not sufficient enough to push the SMOG up and over the Tehachapi Pass.  
 
Bakersfield leads the nation in worst air 99% of the year.  The only time the LA Basin beats Bakersfield in worst SMOG is when we get 40 MPH plus winds from the north, about 5 to 10 days per year.
 
The SMOG dries on the way here and ends up as a very fine almost a blackish brown dust full of gunk ready to eat everything alive.  We also lead the nation in Cancer per capita too.
 
The ACT-6006 is the only cleaner that I found that will counteract the crud on my track.  Any cleaner will work for a few days but as you said ACT-6006 hangs in there, a couple of months here.
 
Mel
 
 
Modeling the SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 186 posts
Posted by CandOsteam on Sunday, August 2, 2015 12:43 AM

Yikes!  Those are unfortunate facts... 

Joel

Modeling the C&O New River Subdivision circa 1949 for the fun of it!

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • 195 posts
Posted by JDL56 on Monday, August 3, 2015 8:43 PM

Nobody yet has mentioned Wahl Clipper Oil, which I have been using since 2001--and I haven't cleaned my track (or locomotive wheels) since that time. 

I posted an article about it on my blog: http://cprailmmsub.blogspot.ca/2009/09/to-oil-or-not-oil-tracksthat-is.html

John Longhurst, Winnipeg

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 685 posts
Posted by Howard Zane on Thursday, August 6, 2015 1:36 AM

If you have a chance, observe well used real rails. The tops are quite shiny and clean. Model rail track is somewhat similar...only a bit smaller. Point: Run trains often! I have found this the best way to keep rails clean.

Also go for the highest amperage available for your system. This will cut through much crud if it exists. Years back just prior to video taping I had redone a small yard with new paint for rails and new ballast. In my haste to finish, I had forgot to clean rail tops............no problem as I was using quite high amperage with my then Dynatrol analog system. The trains just ran smoothly over the painted rail to everyone's amazement.

I have heard tales that abrassive cleaners cause some pitting in rails causing exsessive dirt to build up. I have not found this to be true.

I've tried several commercial cleaning cars over the years....all did some good, but not as effective as just running trains. The best cleaning car was one that I had built from John Allen's design. I used a 10 oz.box car, drilled two holes in bottom front to back. I placed a heavily weighted masonite block on two dowels which rode up and down freely. When pushed by a locomotive, this seemed to help. It is better to push the cleaning car. No cleaning fluid was used...only the masonite block rubbing the rails.

My two bucks worth in addition to over 60 years of playing with electric trains.

HZ

Howard Zane
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Thursday, August 6, 2015 6:36 AM

HZ,

I agree with You...on the pushing...rather than pulling.

65yr. addiction.

Take Care! Big Smile

Frank

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 2,616 posts
Posted by peahrens on Thursday, August 6, 2015 7:49 AM

On my indoor climate controlled HO layout, where I "gleamed" the rails, I routinely include a John Allen type masonite pad car in my freight train.  Every 2-3 months I may start to hear a sound hiccup somewhere and then run a CMX car with denatured alcohol, and clean the loco wheels with same (spinning over a piece of wet paper towel).  I should probably switch to lacquer thinner.    

Paul

Modeling HO with a transition era UP bent

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: 10,430’ (3,179 m)
  • 2,311 posts
Posted by jjdamnit on Thursday, August 6, 2015 4:46 PM

Hello All,

Where I live relative humidity rarely gets above 20%. The temperature has never gotten above 80ºƒ; if it does it will break existing records. That's not to say that in the winter day time temps of 0ºƒ to -25ºƒ in January are not uncommon.

The only street that is paved is the main highway that passes through town.

With these conditions dust is the main problem. I tried several suggestions presented in these forums for track cleaning.

Solvents that left any residue would act like a magnet for the dust and exacerbate the problem.

On the advice of RR_Mel I tried ACT-6006. The test sections I did remained clean (not white glove clean). I treated the entire pike and have had great success!

My method of application was a piece of lint-free cotton fabric (taken from one of my wife's worn out scrub tops). I soaked it and wiped down the rails. For particularly heavy deposits of rail grime I used a second application.

It's been several weeks and the rails remain clean. The dust on the rolling stock is another story.

I would seriously suggest wearing a solvent resistant disposable glove (Nitrile). The cleaning solution dried out my skin. Nothing serious but proper protection definitely helps.

As far as cleaning cars I have not used one. The hand application of ACT-6006 has sufficed on my pike.

Hope this helps. 

"Uhh...I didn’t know it was 'impossible' I just made it work...sorry"

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • 154 posts
Posted by barrok on Sunday, August 16, 2015 9:25 PM

I use two el cheapo Bachmann track cleaning cabooses -- the ones with a resevoir and a felt pad.  I run them in a pair -- I soak the first one's pad with denatured alcohol and then the second one is left dry to mop up after the first one.  I push them using an athearn GP7.  Works like a charm and my rails are squeaky clean.  Best part -- Paid about $10 for each, and they work fantastic.  I prefer denatured alcohol because it evaporates quickly and does not leave a residue like isopropyl.

 

Chuck

 

Chuck

Modeling the Motor City

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!