Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Athearn RTR couplers

5245 views
35 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Clinton, MO, US
  • 4,261 posts
Athearn RTR couplers
Posted by Medina1128 on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 6:19 AM

I purchased a couple Athearn 30K gallon tank cars that were NITB at a recent train show. They came with what I think were EZMate couplers. I think the trip pins on those couplers have a lower steel content, and don't work real well with Kadee automatic uncoupler magnets. When backing the cars over the magnets, the couplers tended to swing to the wrong side of the magnet, making uncoupling a real PITA. I attribute this to the weak plastic centering whiskers. I replaced them with Kadee #119s (whisker shelf couplers). Other than having to insert a Kadee red washer under the truck, they were a drop-in replacement, and uncouple like champs. This is just one reason, ALL of my rolling stock usually get Kadees before they ever touch the layout. 

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Langley AFB, VA
  • 390 posts
Posted by Meyblc on Sunday, February 5, 2006 1:32 PM
The couplers that have come on my Athearn RTR cars have all been Kadee "clones." They seem to work well, but are not Kadee's. I always swap all couplers over to Kadee's no matter what comes on the Cars / Locomotives just to keep everything consistent on my layout. Be sure to use a coupler height guage to see if the couplers is at the height. Sometimes with Athearn RTR, the couplers may not be at the correct height to begin with.
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Portsmouth, VA
  • 372 posts
Posted by jfallon on Sunday, February 5, 2006 2:07 PM
I think the couplers are Accumates. The ones I have are the old type with the plastic whisker to hold the knuckle closed. This whisker will lose its spring if the coupler is forced or held open for a period of time. As long as the cars are kept on a layout or stored in their original boxes, they work fine.

If everybody is thinking alike, then nobody is really thinking.

http://photobucket.com/tandarailroad/

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Yukon OK
  • 385 posts
Posted by okiechoochoo on Sunday, February 5, 2006 4:43 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Meyblc

The couplers that have come on my Athearn RTR cars have all been Kadee "clones." They seem to work well, but are not Kadee's. I always swap all couplers over to Kadee's no matter what comes on the Cars / Locomotives just to keep everything consistent on my layout. Be sure to use a coupler height guage to see if the couplers is at the height. Sometimes with Athearn RTR, the couplers may not be at the correct height to begin with.


Do the KDs you convert on Athearn RTR cars just fit without any problem except possible height issues.

All Lionel all the time.

Okiechoochoo

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Whitby, ON
  • 2,594 posts
Posted by CP5415 on Sunday, February 5, 2006 4:47 PM
The couplers on most RTR are from Bachman.

Replace them with KD's when ever possible.

Gordon

Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!

 K1a - all the way

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, February 5, 2006 6:27 PM
Most of the time on the cars they're Bachmann EZ Mates, on the engines they're usually McHenrys.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Langley AFB, VA
  • 390 posts
Posted by Meyblc on Sunday, February 5, 2006 6:53 PM
Yes, you can simply remove the factory installed Kadee clone couplers and install the Kadee. I have yet to find a car that i could not do this with. Then it only becomes a question of coupler height, as mentioned before.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Yukon OK
  • 385 posts
Posted by okiechoochoo on Sunday, February 5, 2006 8:31 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Meyblc

Yes, you can simply remove the factory installed Kadee clone couplers and install the Kadee. I have yet to find a car that i could not do this with. Then it only becomes a question of coupler height, as mentioned before.


I have mostly 40 foot boxcars in Athearn RTR. Do KD #5 s drop in. How about the coupler spring. Is it a problem or do the coupler boxes on the RTR accept them ok
Sorry to have so many questions, I am new to HO. Thanks

All Lionel all the time.

Okiechoochoo

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Madison County, KY
  • 145 posts
Posted by skerber on Sunday, February 5, 2006 9:24 PM
I have found out that my Athearn RTR freight cars' brown plastic couplers lasts only about a year or so before I need to switch them with KD #5. I can tell its time to change to KD when a freight car uncouples itself while running around the layout. I have had some problem trying to get the KD # 5 level with correct height, but after a few tries with washers I seem to get the right height.
http://skerber.rrpicturearchives.net/
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 1,261 posts
Posted by emdgp92 on Monday, February 6, 2006 9:37 AM
A Kadee #5 should drop right in on your Athearn 40-foot boxcars. If it's too low, add a red Kadee washer or two to raise the carbody a bit. If all else fails, I sometimes swap in a #27 coupler. This will fit the Athearn or Kadee #5-style box with no problems.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Ma.
  • 5,199 posts
Posted by bogp40 on Monday, February 6, 2006 4:36 PM
Some of the Kadee clones also use the bronze centering spring. Even though it may look identical to the Kadee, they don't always center as well. At first, I was tempted and gave it a shot, very poor operation. I believe these are used on P2K or Atlas.
Bob K.

Modeling B&O- Chessie  Bob K.  www.ssmrc.org

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Clinton, MO, US
  • 4,261 posts
Posted by Medina1128 on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 6:16 AM

I purchased a couple Athearn 30K gallon tank cars that were NITB at a recent train show. They came with what I think were EZMate couplers. I think the trip pins on those couplers have a lower steel content, and don't work real well with Kadee automatic uncoupler magnets. When backing the cars over the magnets, the couplers tended to swing to the wrong side of the magnet, making uncoupling a real PITA. I attribute this to the weak plastic centering whiskers. I replaced them with Kadee #119s (whisker shelf couplers). Other than having to insert a Kadee red washer under the truck, they were a drop-in replacement, and uncouple like champs. This is just one reason, ALL of my rolling stock usually get Kadees before they ever touch the layout. 

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:52 AM

post topic duplicated in thread merger

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:05 AM

okiechoochoo
Are the couplers that come on Athearn RTR freight cars decent? What brand are they and are KDs an easy conversion on the cars or do they not fit without a lot of work.

There seems to be some confusion by the answers I've read in this topic.  Athearn RTR trains come with McHenry brand plastic KD clones - as stated in the descriptions of the rolling stock on their website. 

Those couplers are not decent, they are of poor quality - mainly because the spring that keeps the coupler closed is plastic and becomes fatigued and will not reliably hold the coupler closed - thus you get random uncouplings - a constant nuisance at best and possible run aways and damaged trains at worst.

You can buy Athearn RTR trains and they may operate as described above, even though they are new, in the box and never have been used.  That is because fatigue sets in even while the models are stored in the box, whether at home or on a shelf waiting to be sold.  Athearn really needs to stop using poor quality couplers in their trains just to save a dollar or two.  IMO it is short changing the hobbyist to sell a product like that.

Changing out for Kadee's should be simply a matter of swapping out and checking coupler height against Kadee's height gauge and if necessary adding a washer if they come out low - adding it between the bolster and the trucks.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Ma.
  • 5,199 posts
Posted by bogp40 on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:06 AM

Marlon, may not be so much the "steel" content as the trip pin itself may not be positioned at the angled off to the side for magnet throw for uncoupling. Had this happen a few times as the pin can be a lousey press fit into the plastic and not in the proper position. Best to just toss and replace it anyway w/ the kadee.

Modeling B&O- Chessie  Bob K.  www.ssmrc.org

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:11 AM

riogrande5761
IMO, for this reason they are an inferior product and I don't know why Athearn continues to use them in otherwise very nice products.

Probably because Horizon Hobby (Athearn) bought Mchenry Coupler back in 2006 so don't expect Athearn to stop using them anytime soon Thumbs Down

My rolling stock is 98% Kadee and 2% Walthers Proto-Max, which, so far, have performed OK for me.

The Kadee trip pin is VERY soft alloy, very high in iron content. I found out the hard way that other manufacturers use different grades of steel for their trip pins.

I normally cut them off and have a dedicated pair of Xuron nippers for the job. I recently tried to clip the trip pins on a Rapido passenger car and took a big chunk out of the cutting edge of the Xuron cutters! Their trip pins must be made out of HRC 55-66 Rockwell steel!

One time I had a cut of cars parked on a grade with the slack run-in for several days. All the plastic fingers on the knuckle springs became deformed and the couplers were useless. (I had not gotten around to installing the Kadees yet)

ALL plastic couplers belong in the trash...

Ed

 

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:21 AM

If it's Athearn, they're McHenry's. Athearn (Horizon) owns, or has controlling interest in, McHenry:

from a June 2006 news release,

Horizon Hobby, exclusive distributor of Athearn and Roundhouse model railroad products, has added McHenry Couplers to its product line. McHenry’s operations will be managed from Carson, Calif., where Horizon’s other model railroad lines are based.

Robert Staat, McHenry’s president, is excited about the company’s future with Horizon. “I look forward to doing what I enjoy most; designing new products,” Staat said. “By combining the strengths of both of our companies, the real winners will be our many loyal customers.”

Athearn president Tim Geddes added, “McHenry Couplers joins Athearn and Roundhouse as another example of good quality and high-value products that Horizon is committed to bringing to the market. McHenry Couplers add value to many of Athearn’s locomotives and rolling stock, and we look forward to continuing the relationships Bob has built with other manufacturers.” 

"good quality and high-value" are their opinion...

Kadee for me, Ed

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:25 AM

gmpullman
 
riogrande5761
IMO, for this reason they are an inferior product and I don't know why Athearn continues to use them in otherwise very nice products. 

Probably because Horizon Hobby (Athearn) bought Mchenry Coupler back in 2006 so don't expect Athearn to stop using them anytime soon Thumbs Down

Maybe, but I will still make my feelings known as a customer.  Obviously some manufacturers have listened, such as Intermountain, ExactRail, Tangent and even Bowser.  Walthesr Protomax appear to be close metal clones of Kadee's and should be ok.  Time for Athearn and Atlas, the two holdouts, to get onboard!

One time I had a cut of cars parked on a grade with the slack run-in for several days. All the plastic fingers on the knuckle springs became deformed and the couplers were useless. (I had not gotten around to installing the Kadees yet)

ALL plastic couplers belong in the trash...

Ed

 

Any coupler with the plastic finger holding the knuckle closes is trash - thats for sure.  And I agree with you, and just picked up another bulk pack of KD's over the weekend, but have a long way to got to get my fleet fully converted.  As usual, it comes down to money to have all the right stuff!

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • 384 posts
Posted by Redore on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:28 AM

Kadee No. 5 (separate centering spring) and 148 (whisker centering spring) will drop right in to the RTR coupling box.  Make sure the metal clip locks in place, or better yet, get the A-line or MicroMark drilling jig to drill out the center of the coupler mounting pin and put a screw in to hold the cover in place.  Athearn cars' couplers are usually low on at least one end.  A No 6 flat washer between the truck and the car frame usually brings the low end up to the right height.

 

Leave one truck very loose and one a little loose for better tracking.  Most RTR cars have the trucks screwed down tight and the trucks can't rock and roll to follow track irregularities.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:32 AM

gmpullman

If it's Athearn, they're McHenry's. Athearn (Horizon) owns, or has controlling interest in, McHenry:

from a June 2006 news release,

Horizon Hobby, exclusive distributor of Athearn and Roundhouse model railroad products, has added McHenry Couplers to its product line. McHenry’s operations will be managed from Carson, Calif., where Horizon’s other model railroad lines are based.

Robert Staat, McHenry’s president, is excited about the company’s future with Horizon. “I look forward to doing what I enjoy most; designing new products,” Staat said. “By combining the strengths of both of our companies, the real winners will be our many loyal customers.”

Athearn president Tim Geddes added, “McHenry Couplers joins Athearn and Roundhouse as another example of good quality and high-value products that Horizon is committed to bringing to the market. McHenry Couplers add value to many of Athearn’s locomotives and rolling stock, and we look forward to continuing the relationships Bob has built with other manufacturers.” 

"good quality and high-value" are their opinion...

An unfounded opinion based on my experiences.  The excitement Robert Staat must have been mostly financial as the McHenry couplers are inherently a bad design with the plastic finger spring.  Good quality and high-value has been proven to NOT be the case with a little time and experience.  It's time for Athearn and Horizon take note it was a bad move and realize the McHenry couplers are a lability and detract from otherwise good products.

 

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,874 posts
Posted by maxman on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:06 AM

riogrande5761
McHenry couplers are inherently a bad design with the plastic finger spring.

Well, the design has been improved because they no longer have that plastic finger, which has been replaced with a coil spring. http://www.athearn.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=MCH4350

 

However, I still throw them away and use Kadees.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Yukon OK
  • 385 posts
Athearn RTR coupler question
Posted by okiechoochoo on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:06 AM
Are the couplers that come on Athearn RTR freight cars decent? What brand are they and are KDs an easy conversion on the cars or do they not fit without a lot of work.

All Lionel all the time.

Okiechoochoo

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,874 posts
Posted by maxman on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:10 AM

riogrande5761
Any coupler with the plastic finger holding the knuckle closes is trash - thats for sure.

Somehow this topic has come up twice.  So I will point out again that the McJunk has been improved with a coil spring http://www.athearn.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=MCH4350

I still throw them away.

Moderator
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Waukesha, WI
  • 1,764 posts
Posted by Steven Otte on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:19 AM

Threads merged.

--
Steven Otte, Model Railroader senior associate editor
sotte@kalmbach.com

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:39 AM

maxman
 
riogrande5761
Any coupler with the plastic finger holding the knuckle closes is trash - thats for sure.

 

Somehow this topic has come up twice.  So I will point out again that the McJunk has been improved with a coil spring http://www.athearn.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=MCH4350

I still throw them away.

Thats good they got rid of the awful plastic finger - which was, BTW, the coupler that Athearn referenced in it's glowing 2006 memorandum talking about quality and value.

Unfortunately I have a large number of Athearn (ex-MDC) Thrall coal gons that came with the finger springs - which will need replacing with due haste due to the false uncouplings.  While worth every penny, the KD whisker couplers are about $34 per bulk pack so it's going to hit me up for probably about $150 at least, to mitigate the old version of McHeny's.  They will of course get priority over the plastic couplers that have to metal spring.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: NW Pa Snow-belt.
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by ricktrains4824 on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:46 AM

The newer McHenry's with the coil springs: While not as good as Kadee couplers, I will leave them on until they fail, then I replace them. So far, I have only had issues with a couple times, and have several that, once at the right height, they work well. Biggest issues? Height. Only two times have I had one fail otherwise. 

Ricky W.

HO scale Proto-freelancer.

My Railroad rules:

1: It's my railroad, my rules.

2: It's for having fun and enjoyment.

3: Any objections, consult above rules.

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,455 posts
Posted by wp8thsub on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:48 PM

ricktrains4824
The newer McHenry's with the coil springs: While not as good as Kadee couplers, I will leave them on until they fail, then I replace them.

I also more-or-less use a replace on failure policy.  The exceptions are cases where the longer shank plastic couplers are used, as on piggyback flats, as they deform under load and come uncoupled.

Failure for a McHenry coupler isn't necessarily breakage.  Due to the amount of switching on my layout, cars get coupled and uncoupled a lot.  Eventually, the McHenry knucles start to wedge open or closed.  Once that happens they're done for.

I'll throw in a suggestion to refrain from just throwing the McHenry types away.  If they have metal knuckle springs, save the springs for use on Kadees as they are interchangeable.  

Rob Spangler

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Clinton, MO, US
  • 4,261 posts
Posted by Medina1128 on Wednesday, April 15, 2015 7:39 AM

okiechoochoo
QUOTE: Originally posted by Meyblc

Yes, you can simply remove the factory installed Kadee clone couplers and install the Kadee. I have yet to find a car that i could not do this with. Then it only becomes a question of coupler height, as mentioned before.



I have mostly 40 foot boxcars in Athearn RTR. Do KD #5 s drop in. How about the coupler spring. Is it a problem or do the coupler boxes on the RTR accept them ok
Sorry to have so many questions, I am new to HO. Thanks

 

When I started out in the hobby (in the mid 80s), my standard coupler was the Kadee #5. I've since changed to the Kadee #148; it's the whisker coupler direct replacement for the #5. No bronze centering spring to mess with. The next time you shop, make sure you get the Kadee coupler height gauge and their special coupler pliers. And while you're at it, buy some of Kadee's red fiber washers. It's been my experience with Athearn cars that the couplers tend to be low. The washer will raise the car height, bringing the coupler dead on.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Wednesday, April 15, 2015 8:01 AM

Marlon,

Good reminder.  Ever since the 80's I've had packages of the gray and red Kadee fiber washers and a Kadee height gauge on-hand to help adjust coupler height when building kits.  Part of the rolling stock tune up process.  I like the whisker couplers as they are often easier to install vs. the bronze spring type - which often need extra work to get them to fit into some coupler pockets, especially Walthers redbox kits cars.

wp8thsub

I also more-or-less use a replace on failure policy.

I'll throw in a suggestion to refrain from just throwing the McHenry types away.  If they have metal knuckle springs, save the springs for use on Kadees as they are interchangeable.

Pretty much what I'm following - mainly due to time constraints and economic reasons.

Excellent suggestion to save those springs, it's always a big help to have a steady supply of those on hand as they occasionally pop out of couplers and need replaced.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:36 PM
Just as an aside, I believe that the patent Kadee had expired, so it allowed other manufacturers to duplicate Kadee's design. It seems that Kadee still produces a superior product.
Smitty

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!