Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Big Boy curve radius

20151 views
35 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:48 PM

cuyama

I notice that everyone is answering the question from eleven years ago, and not addressing the newcomer’s posting that resurrected the thread.

Modus operandi for this forum - and guilty as charged.

osgoodp73
I have a Rivarossi big Boy and I have been able to successfully run 4001 on a 22 inch radius, I am currently designing a helix for my home that will encompass from basement to 2nd story, I only have about a 4 ft dead space to accomplish this.... anyone have plans for a helix, ? I checked the calculator, and it is putting me at a 2.8% grade but only gives me a 96 inch plan 

That, unfortunately, is an idea that won’t work well. Curves on grades increase the effective gradient substantially, especially tighter curves such as 22” radius in HO. The rule-of-thumb for the additional effective grade is 32/R, “R” being the nominal grade. This would add about 1.5% to the nominal grade.

Helixes are a major space hog which is what led me to go with a no-lix in my rather small space, plus they are rather complex to build.  As you noted, it's a strict trade-off between radius and grade - tighter radius = steeper grade.  OP stated 48-inches of dead space implying curve radii have to fit inside of that implying to me max curve radii would have to be no more than about 22-inches - not pretty for a helix.

If I did my math right, allowing for a bare minimum rise of 4-inches per turn(assuming 1 inch of track and subroadbed in the helix and 3-inches clearance) a 22-inch radius curve in the helix would be ~138 inches length per turn (2 x Pi x radius).  Grade being rise/run divide 4 by 138 and get about 2.9% grade in a helix that tight.

More importantly, the Big Boy model is unlikely to work well when coupled to a train on a curved helix of that radius. The extra friction of the curves creates a tendency for the train to “stringline” – that is, to derail across the center of the curve. Even with less-demanding engines than a Big Boy, experienced modelers have found that multi-turn HO helixes work better at broader radii like 28-30” and beyond.

Best of luck with your layout, but this is an idea that is not practical.

Agree.  Tight radius and steep grade there would be a lot of drag and tendency to stringline.  Just not workable unless you plan on running short trains of short rolling stock.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 2:05 PM

osgoodp73
Hi everyone, lifetime hobbyist, I have a Rivarossi big Boy and I have been able to successfully run 4001 on a 22 inch radius, I am currently designing a helix for my home that will encompass from basement to 2nd story, I only have about a 4 ft dead space to accomplish this.... anyone have plans for a helix, ? I checked the calculator, and it is putting me at a 2.8% grade but only gives me a 96 inch plan

 
OK wait a minute...you're building a helix to connect the basement to the second story of the house?? So like from the basement to the attic??
Surprise
Stix
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 2:18 PM

wjstix
OK wait a minute...you're building a helix to connect the basement to the second story of the house?? So like from the basement to the attic??
Surprise
 

 
Yes, that was a what the heck moment for me too.  It's one thing to gain a couple feet by helix, but lets do the math say to go up two full floors - say 9 feet per level. 
 
Going up two levels at 9 feet each, thats 18 feet or 216 inches.  At minimum 4 inches per turn in the helix thats 54 turns or trips around at 138 inches per turn = total of 7,452 inches of track from bottom to top, or 621 feet or about 10 scale miles and change!  Thats 207 pieces of flex track!  Imagine how long it would take for a train to wind it's way from top to bottom or visa versa!  Holy guacomoli!

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 869 posts
Posted by davidmurray on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:14 PM

riogrande5761
Yes, that was a what the heck moment for me too. It's one thing to gain a couple feet by helix, but lets do the math say to go up two full floors - say 9 feet per level.

This would also seem to me to require holes/replacement floor supports for two set of floor joists.  this seem to require an experienced, brave man.  No advice from me, I could not do it.

Dave

David Murray from Oshawa, Ontario Canada
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 7:25 PM

selector
When there was any doubt, or when the crew and yarders knew a given locomotive might derail due to tight curves, people walked beside the locomotive while it edged around the curve, keeping an eye.  They watched for lifting wheels.  They did this when they last moved UP 9000 along the main to get it to CA in the 50's if I recall.  I have a steam calendar with a photo of this event.

I love that photo.  Don't remember which calendar it was from but I saved that month and framed it.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 9:25 PM

Hey, TZ.  Yup, one of my favourite historical rail photos, even though it was at the very end of steam and comparatively modern.  Who couldn't admire those twin flying pumps, the obviously looooonnnnng boiler, and all those drivers that looked like it was a foobie...impossible for a steamer to have that many driver axles!!!  Very focused and careful walkers looking for the earliest signs of an impending derailment as the loco rounded the curve, but on the wider crossover.

-Crandell

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!