Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

CNR 4-6-4T - found a stand in

2395 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 2,314 posts
CNR 4-6-4T - found a stand in
Posted by don7 on Saturday, January 5, 2013 10:56 PM

I model both CNR and CPR and while both of these railroads had 4-6-4 tank engines I have only been able to find pictures of the CNR engine and a diagram of the CPR version.

I recently came across a stand in model for the CNR version. I think it is a very close stand in, what do your think? Neither of the Canadian tank engines were ever made in model form.

The CNR version

Now the stand in

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, January 5, 2013 11:48 PM

Is that a Gem/Olympia CNJ 4-6-4T?

      --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 2,314 posts
Posted by don7 on Sunday, January 6, 2013 12:23 AM

You are right, it was noted to be a North West Scale Models,

I am told that it is an updated version.

It had a new motor and NWSL gears added and a number of the castings replaced and resoldered.

  • Member since
    September 2012
  • From: Fraser Valley, BC
  • 538 posts
Posted by Rastafarr on Sunday, January 6, 2013 10:21 AM

don7

I model both CNR and CPR and while both of these railroads had 4-6-4 tank engines I have only been able to find pictures of the CNR engine and a diagram of the CPR version.

I recently came across a stand in model for the CNR version. I think it is a very close stand in, what do your think? Neither of the Canadian tank engines were ever made in model form.

The CNR version

Now the stand in

I see a few differences around the cab and the domes, but nothing that couldn't be lived with (or fixed; it's all solder-on brass bits). Were I in your position, I'd be going for it.

Stu

Streamlined steam, oh, what a dream!!

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Sunday, January 6, 2013 12:50 PM

The CNJ loco could be an adequate 'foobie' with the right paint and decals.  The only thing that really blows its cover is that anthracite-burning Wooten firebox that sticks through the front corners of the cab.

I have a couple of more blatant 'foobies' running on my layout - obvious North American prototypes that never came within the Pacific Ocean's width of Central Japan.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!