I also model the transistion era, though I wasn't around until 58. I started modeling the 70/80s but have been going backward. For me that era had more variety in equipment, passenger trains, even industries and structures have more character than today.
My layout is eclectic. Most things on the layout are the result of a request by or a gift from my wife or grandchildren.
We have Two models of the Phoebe Snow, one with heavyweights pulled by F3 A-B-A as she was in the forties and fifties and one smooth side pulled by E-8s as she was when I rode her in the sixties. We have K-4 Pacific steam, we have GP-38s in two different roads. We have NYCTA R-17 and R-22 subway trains, and we have Hogwart's Express and Thomas the Tank Engine.
Dave
Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow
I model the (former) Southern Pacific line on the San Francisco peninsula. I live on the peninsula and trains in the bay area have always appealed to me. I pretty much model the present day, though some of my equipment is modeled as it appeared in 2005, and it has since been repainted. By modeling this area I can have both modern equipment and some patched old SP and DRGW road switchers that have avoided the paint shop. This allows me to keep some locomotives from my favorite railroad on my roster and realistically run them in the present day. The transition era never appealed to me; Im strictly a diesel man. Theres something about a long freight being pulled by a consist of filthy SP diesels that steam just cannot compare to!
Cahrn
I model the 40's to 50's for the same reasons as the above posts. You can do both diesel and steam. I model the Western Pacific and I also sneak in some later diesels such as the GP-35 and GP-40.
When I was a child, I modeled as a child. But, when my Mom told me to put away childish things, I carefully packed my trains...
Now, 40 years later, those "childish things" are the basis for my early 1960's layout.
But then, one day, I was at my LHS and a sultry, dark beauty whistled at me. Not the classic 36-24-36, but rather a more well-rounded 0-6-0. And, I was seduced by the eternal lure of steam...
So, I have a dual-era layout. My structures could serve either the 1930s or the 1960s. I swap out the trains and the automobiles, and there I am. In my mind, the music changes from old jazz to British Invasion, the gas prices jump a dime, and the hiss of steam is replaced by the smell of diesel oil.
And somehow, the Wayback Machine brings me where I want to be.
It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse.
Well, I'm 23 and I model 1954 in New Mexico - a full 32 years before I was born!
I think what attracts me to the 1950s is the sheer visual interest of the motive power and rolling stock. An F3 actually looks different to a GP7, which looks different to an RS-2, and there's still steam around as well. Modern era locos and intermodal cars all look the same - boring.
That's my anyway.
The Location: Forests of the Pacific Northwest, OregonThe Year: 1948The Scale: On30The Blog: http://bvlcorr.tumblr.com
I don't model an 'era.' I model one specific month at one specific spot - September, 1964, the Upper Kiso Valley in the Central Japan Alps.
As for why - I was there, my wife and our toddlers were there and we made some wonderful memories together. Now one of those toddlers is a grandmother, but both of them remember that ride into the woods aboard a Kiso Rintetsu train. As for my wife, she's busy cooking dinner right now.
And now a comment about luck. Turns out that September, 1964, was the pivotal transition month for JNR rolling stock:
It was a great time to be alive, in Japan and a railfan.
Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)
I like the more modern diesels but I am not going for an era but more of an area. I grew in rural South Georgia and always had pleny of CSX trains going through my town, so I am going more for so the southern rural look, which can go with just about any era building out on the market. When the wife asked what I wanted for Christmas and I said an HO train I did specify that it had to be a CSX train.
Well I'm one of those transition era modelers, but I'm not old enough to remember the time period I model, it is three/four years before I was born!
I am about to turn 53, born in 1957 - I model 1954.
Why, because it was a good time for the railroads, lots of new stuff and lots of money being spent on improvements, but still had things like heavyweight pasenger cars and steam locos.
New ideas like piggypack were coming on line, passenger service was still "fancy" and CTC, radios and other technology was coming of age - a generally positive and exciting time for railroading.
And, I like history so modeling a time before I lived is a study in history as well as a modeling persuit.
Sheldon
I'm 42 and love Pennsy steam and early diesels... not sure why... I think I have an "old soul"
I model early to mid 60's. When I was in my early teens I always visited the nearby New York Central yard in Moraine, Ohio. I made friends with several of the car inspectors and was able to walk the yard with them. Occasionally I got to ride in the engine of the local down to West Carrollton and back. Those were the days!
You are probably right about the majority of transition era modelers. I'm one and it is because of what I fondly remember. I remember stopping by the station when we went down the mountain to the "big town" and watching a steam engine pull a freight train through or a passenger train stop, uncouple the engine and it would go ahead a couple hundred feet to the water tank. My mother had the foresite to take a friend and I on one of the last regularly scheduled steam passenger trains on the Rutland RR. (One of the last passenger trains on the line, period!)
It's not that I don't stop and watch modern locos pulling long (or short) trains when I get the chance, but they are few and far between close to me. However, they are just big motors on wheels, steamers were action, parts moving everywhere, exciting to watch, though I doubt I appreciated the complexity of those mechanical machines at the time.
As the previous poster said, there's just something about watching them. An alternative for those who like to run some steam, but prefer modern diesels, is a tourist train. Thankfully many locations still have them operating with steam. Our "local" switched to diesel, but it's still fun to go for a ride in the vintage passenger cars.
In my world it is never earlier then 1925 or later then 1927, I faithfully model the SP Ojai branch which was a major source of citrus and produce among other commidities, until 1932 the SP provided Pullman service for resort patrons, thus a good blend of operations are possible. As paved roads developed, many shippers abandoned rail service, changes within the industry also impacted later rail service. To be a glutton for punishment, i've chosen S scale where it has been necessary to scratchbuild or kitbash virtually all the motive power and a great precentage of the rolling stock.
I can't precisely say where I get my inspiration, perhaps growing up in the Northern California foothills where we harvested an apple crop each year and pears every other year for sale to the local co-op where it was shipped by rail might factor into it.8D]
I have always wanted to model civil war era trains and finally found a way.
Visit:
http://www.28mmcivilwarrailroading.com/
Harold
I'm 38 and I model 1945-1955 where both steam and diesels ruled the rails. Obviously steam was long gone before I was even born, but to me there is something about a steam engine chugging up a grade or crossing a wooden trestle. But then my diesels can sure pull a lot of cars, so this era gives me the best of both worlds.
Scott
I'm wondering what eras you model and why. I notice that the 50's seem really popular.
Is it because of your age? When you were a young "whipper snapper" in your teens and 20s.
For me it's a little different, I'm 41 and I really like the modern era 1998 - 2010
Michael
CEO- Mile-HI-RailroadPrototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989