Note to self:
Never open my model railroad to other model railroaders.
I second the shiny "spandex clothing".....and just people in general....they never look real for some strange reason..
tatans wm3798-- Great idea for sedum and/or shorten them. The 100' walls are not too nifty as are the 3 layered tracks on rock walls, I think they refer to them as wedding cake scenes. Along with fat gorilla-like figures in shiny clothing ½ way up the side of a locomotive,referred to as gumby figures.
wm3798-- Great idea for sedum and/or shorten them. The 100' walls are not too nifty as are the 3 layered tracks on rock walls, I think they refer to them as wedding cake scenes. Along with fat gorilla-like figures in shiny clothing ½ way up the side of a locomotive,referred to as gumby figures.
I'd agree there on all points
1) Shorten them and bunch them as per the second picture
2) The CN doubletrack west of TO comes up the Niagara Escarpment by Dundas ON--I'm not sure of the incline but it is something---You can hear everything just hammering away going up that incline I'll say--
3) Or anywhere---Spandex wearers---
Any argument carried far enough will end up in Semantics--Hartz's law of rhetoric Emerald. Leemer and Southern The route of the Sceptre Express Barry
I just started my blog site...more stuff to come...
http://modeltrainswithmusic.blogspot.ca/
selectorHaving said that, I must say some photographic backdrops work very well when they are placed properly, and matched in terms of angle of view, with the "scenery" in front of them. Quite often, the two don't match. The scenery falls toward the backdrop, but the backdrop shows mostly sky...where it couldn't possibly be!
PASMITHblownout cylinder PASMITHModel scenery with photographic backdrops. (IMO, it s more realistic to match your skills from foreground to background regardless of your skill level) Peter Smith, Memphis Well, I suppose---- -but what happens when you have some poor guffer who has a superrealistic talent when it comes to modelling but apparently is a 3 year old when it comes to painting backdrop?---I'd rather do photographic backdrop than see what appears to be a 3 year old's painting of a backdrop----I think the transition would be a bit---um---abrupt - iis I agree with your example. That would be an abrupt transition. But, it is hard for me to imagine a person who has super-realistic talent and is a 3 year old when it comes to painting a backdrop. Peter Smith, Memphis
blownout cylinder PASMITHModel scenery with photographic backdrops. (IMO, it s more realistic to match your skills from foreground to background regardless of your skill level) Peter Smith, Memphis Well, I suppose---- -but what happens when you have some poor guffer who has a superrealistic talent when it comes to modelling but apparently is a 3 year old when it comes to painting backdrop?---I'd rather do photographic backdrop than see what appears to be a 3 year old's painting of a backdrop----I think the transition would be a bit---um---abrupt
PASMITHModel scenery with photographic backdrops. (IMO, it s more realistic to match your skills from foreground to background regardless of your skill level) Peter Smith, Memphis
Well, I suppose----
-but what happens when you have some poor guffer who has a superrealistic talent when it comes to modelling but apparently is a 3 year old when it comes to painting backdrop?---I'd rather do photographic backdrop than see what appears to be a 3 year old's painting of a backdrop----I think the transition would be a bit---um---abrupt
...or a three year old modeller with respect to his/her talent using a photographic backdrop scene...that does not compute, either.
Having said that, I must say some photographic backdrops work very well when they are placed properly, and matched in terms of angle of view, with the "scenery" in front of them. Quite often, the two don't match. The scenery falls toward the backdrop, but the backdrop shows mostly sky...where it couldn't possibly be!
I've seen it in many, many instances. Layouts are built by people accustomed to and skilled at working in three dimensions. Painting a backdrop is two dimensional. Those are two entirely different skill sets.
If one doesn't like photo backdrops, a clear blue sky can always be used - it never detracts.
- Harry
PASMITH iis I agree with your example. That would be an abrupt transition. But, it is hard for me to imagine a person who has super-realistic talent and is a 3 year old when it comes to painting a backdrop. Peter Smith, Memphis
It is odd but in this fellows case I've seen---it definitely makes for a chin stroking---hmmmn
Then again, is it possible he could be doing a abstractionist's poke at us?
blownout cylinderPASMITHModel scenery with photographic backdrops. (IMO, it s more realistic to match your skills from foreground to background regardless of your skill level) Peter Smith, Memphis Well, I suppose---- -but what happens when you have some poor guffer who has a superrealistic talent when it comes to modelling but apparently is a 3 year old when it comes to painting backdrop?---I'd rather do photographic backdrop than see what appears to be a 3 year old's painting of a backdrop----I think the transition would be a bit---um---abrupt
Lee-I would say the top photo is what a 'Plane' tree --in southern Europe--would look more like. We, however, need to do them closer to bottom------
~G4
19 Years old, modeling the Cowlitz, Chehalis, and Cascade Railroad of Western Washington in 1927 in 6X6 feet.
Topic diversion Warning:
Sedum straight from the stem is indeed too flat to make a realistic tree. However, if you take a moment to break apart the stems then glue them together to create a multi-tiered crown, it works quite well...
For me the scenery is there as more of a stage set. There's a lot missing from my scenes. What drives me wild is roads, tracks and other major scenic elements that run parallel to the table edge. I don't know why, it just bugs me.
Another thing is impossible engineering feats like retaining walls that are 100' vertical drops, or two tunnel bores that are right on top of one another in an obvious attempt to hide a loop or something. Sometimes you can't avoid stuff like that, but there are better ways of disguising them...
Lee
Route of the Alpha Jets www.wmrywesternlines.net
galaxySome guys will make Messy train yards and engine service facilities on model railroads. In real life, due to hazzards and safety concerns they are not messy, but neatly organized.
Some guys will make Messy train yards and engine service facilities on model railroads.
In real life, due to hazzards and safety concerns they are not messy, but neatly organized.
collectthem What are some things done in modeling in scenery that you would never see in real World? I see some layouts and it’s amazing but can’t imagine in real World situations. For example, a clump of bushes that looks neat on a layout but in real life, it just would not happen.
A water fall that has a small pond with no where for the water to go other then that tiny pond...
Larry
Conductor.
Summerset Ry.
"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt Safety First!"
I'd echo what several people have said about too many automobiles, especially on steam era layouts. My Dad was born in 1918, when I'd put in a layout tour video (like the "Great Model Railroad" series) that was a layout set before WW2 he'd inevitably point out that the layout had too many autos. One of the reasons you had streetcars back then is because people used them !!
BTW in my Dad's case, he learned to drive before his Dad did. Grandpa was a milkman and didn't learn to drive until his employer (Franklin Co-op Creamery in Minneapolis MN) changed from horse-drawn wagons to trucks in the forties. Otherwise, Grandpa walked or took the streetcar to work or wherever he was going.
CNJ831I can't speak to westcoast tree species but I can't ever recall seeing any common North American tree that closely resembles Sedum. If you are familiar with any, please post an image.
I'm wondering whether someone isn't confusing us by using Sedum to represent a 'plain' or, 'Plane', tree? They seem to be flattened at their tops----
Coke plants without coal lorries or extractors. How exactly do you expect the coal to get in? And the Coke to get out?
Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions
Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!
I guess my biggest complaint (1.) would be running through a scene more than once. If you have to do it there's nothing for it but to do it. (2.) Big locomotives on small layouts with tight curves.
Each of us should model in the best possible way we each know how to. We should learn from others and not be critical of others. What I don't like doesn't mean I can't tolerate it on someones layout but that maybe I would try in every way possible to "not do it" on my own layout. We need to remember to encourage others and not hinder their enjoyment of the hobby.
This is supposed to be a hobby, a re creation of a scene in our minds eye and it's supposed to be enjoyable to each of us in his or her own way and remember, none of us see eye to eye on any give subject so lets be tolerable of others layouts that have things we wouldn't have on our own. They are doing the best they know how and maybe enjoying the hobby more than we are?
The way I see trees, anything close is good enough. Well there are some exceptions.................... Cedums aren't one of them. Done right with several clumps added to make one tree turn out very nicely and only "represent" a tree. :-) We only have just so much space to "represent" a scene. Each see it (the space) differently.
Bob
I don't like seeing driverless cars and trucks out on the highway, particularly convertibles.
And I really hate oversized Hot Wheels race cars, like 1:64 cars on an HO layout. C'mon, there really are a lot of appropriate scale models out there. Find them, and give the Hot Wheels to some kid. Even Jeff Gordon doesn't drive a 30-foot-long Chevy Malibu with NASCAR logos to the super market, does he? (Gee, I dunno, really. I don't follow car racing at all, but my guess is, he doesn't.)
It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse.
CNJ831There is a physical parameter called "the angle of repose" that limits just how steep a hillside can be and still retain its ground surface (dirt). In most cases, this is less than 45 degrees, even with trees and shrubs helping to hold the soil in place. Vertical foilage walls, except maybe in the case of vines, just doesn't look realistic. It can look pretty bad when viewed straight on but becomes totally unblievable when seen from an acute angle.
The only way that a cliff face works is if the region being modelled is precisely having just such a situation---ie--there are many areas along the Niagara Escarpment where rock wall are darn near vertical and still have vegetation BUT we are NOT talking great heaping hords of the stuff! BTW--the areas of vegetation do tend to sit on 40 degree slopes intermingled with verticals--so even then--if you are going to model verticals try to consider the less than vertical as part of the overall--
If one wants to look for themselves they can always check out any good aerial mapping sites before trying to model such rockwalls to see how it really looks. Also---attached to this---talus at bottom of steep/not so steep faces--I've come across a few people who completely leave these things out---forgetting that, yes, mountains do, at times, have remnants of erosion and slides etc around---
tomikawaTT Vertical rock faces next to the track with not a sign of a borehole...
Vertical rock faces next to the track with not a sign of a borehole...
Let me add an associated situation to this complaint. How about essentially vertical, heavily wooded, hillsides immediately adjacent to the tracks. While I fully appreciate that the depth of our layouts is far from infinite, it shouldn't result in one modeling in a manner that absolutely flies in the face of real-world laws of nature.
There is a physical parameter called "the angle of repose" that limits just how steep a hillside can be and still retain its ground surface (dirt). In most cases, this is less than 45 degrees, even with trees and shrubs helping to hold the soil in place. Vertical foilage walls, except maybe in the case of vines, just doesn't look realistic. It can look pretty bad when viewed straight on but becomes totally unblievable when seen from an acute angle.
CNJ831
blownout cylinderSD90MAC's painted purple with green polka dots--hey--some guy thought this was a neato idea---if you just pictured that in your own mind you will appreciate the horrified look the guy's wife gave him--
What about having a scenery item that's the flat out wrong scale! There's a layout I saw in town here that had O scale trees on an N scale layout. Redwoods them was, as I recall the description from its owner.
Dan
Hand painted backdrops that include anything more than sky and clouds. Very few people have the talent to paint anything else which looks as realistic as their models and scenery.
Pathfinder, no, I'm actually thinking of Ainslie Creek Gorge. Here is the image I took just 10 days ago.
selector...BTW, #5 listed just above my post, I have a photo on the CPR line in the Fraser Valley of just such an arrangement. Not only that, but the famous Kettle Valley Rwy just 40 miles SW of that location had no fewer than three tunnels with two bridges between 'em! -Crandell
BTW, #5 listed just above my post, I have a photo on the CPR line in the Fraser Valley of just such an arrangement. Not only that, but the famous Kettle Valley Rwy just 40 miles SW of that location had no fewer than three tunnels with two bridges between 'em!
-Crandell
Crandell, I think you are referring to the Cisco site in the Fraser Canyon. Another neat aspect of that is the CN mainline goes over the CP on a bridge as they both swap sides at this point.
Garages plopped in middle of field---with NO way to get to it
3 choked yards on a layout only needing 2 lokes---having 19 lokes on 19 trains
Come now---do you need a full fledged town every 5 inches?
Trying to cover ALL seasons on a single 4X8
Getting a SD90Mac and thinking that a couple of them should go around an 12" radius curve and NOT look funny
SD90MAC's painted purple with green polka dots--hey--some guy thought this was a neato idea---if you just pictured that in your own mind you will appreciate the horrified look the guy's wife gave him--
tomikawaTTTowns without clearly-identifiable post offices, municipal offices and cop shops. And, even more so, no fire halls...
And everybody's favorite, the little people, each standing in a personal mud puddle - even on concrete sidewalks.
Anyway, I'm not that big a fan of outmoded and obsolete practices on layouts representing a modern era - such as shipping non-alcoholic items in wooden barrels, small freight stations (not team tracks or the like), funky wooden crates on said freight stations, (US) freight cars w/ roofwalks after, say, 1990, icing platforms and so on. Also, it's true businesses here and there have cutsey or punny names, but too many and too obvious ones are just cringe-inducing (for some reason the poster child in my mind is the old 'W.E. Snatchem' funeral home).