Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Best N scale Flex track

11655 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 28 posts
Best N scale Flex track
Posted by jbdbackfan on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 1:53 PM

I am a college student on a tight budget, but am willing to spend a little more than normal for good quality N scale flex track.   I want something that is easy to mold into curves and is easily cut and looks good.

Peco seems popular from reading alot of articles, but was wondering how good the Atlas Code 55 is?   Or are there better ones out there?

Any help would be great.    Also, I have never used flex track before as I am beginning an N scale model.   Any tips or advice?

 

Thanks,
Joe

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Manitou, Okla
  • 1,630 posts
Posted by mikesmowers on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 4:24 PM

    I am in the process of building a fair sized N scale layout. I have been using Model Power I got from Hobby Lobby with their 40% discount, used to be a good buy but recently the N scale has gone up from 12.99 to 16.99 for a package of 5 pieces. I tried to find it on line but am having a hard time finding it available. I went back to the Atlas as I have used it a lot on my HO scale I am also building.

  The biggest difference I have found is that the Model Power will hold a curve somewhat where the Atlas will straighten itself back out when you release it. Both work very well. I do not know about the Peco flex track, but I am using the Peco turnouts. I am using the code 80 but it shouldn't make to much difference.  Maybe some of the others will chime in and get the help you need.     Mike

Modeling Trains Is Not A Matter Of Life Or Death, It Is Much More Important Than That!!
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Blair, Nebraska
  • 205 posts
Posted by Boiler-man on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 10:10 PM

I used Atlas Code - 55 for my layout and am very pleased with the results and the price is less that any of the other code - 55.

The only draw back if you want to call it that is your locos and rolling stock must be equipped with wheels that have low profile flanges (RP - 25 wheels) which most all of the current equipment has.

Boilerman
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Mesa Arizona
  • 341 posts
Posted by mokenarr on Thursday, December 4, 2008 11:47 AM

I have been using Atlas  n scale flex track sinse the 1970's and have never ever had it break from the ties or any other problem    i have tried a couple type of switches and have had the rail pop off the ties , but never an atlas switch.    you might say i am happy with the Atlas    i have not tried the code 55 as i have way to much stuff that will not run on it.   

when you are laying the track , if tou are going to connect 2 pieces of flex on a curve , be sure to solder the peices together b4 you bend them at the joint

good luck 

 

Old Steam loco's never die, they just lose thier fire.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: On the Banks of the Great Choptank
  • 2,916 posts
Posted by wm3798 on Thursday, December 4, 2008 12:15 PM

 Atlas code 55 is state of the art.  (The problem with Micro Trains wheels is because they are NOT).  Atlas offers a variety of turnouts, including a #10 and a curved, and their turnouts have metal, yet insulated frogs, so they are very DCC friendly.  You do need to devise a means of throwing the points, which can be done with something as simple as a micro slide switch (which can also route the power to the frog) or as comprehensive as a Tortoise.  If you've used Atlas -80 standard flex, you'll find the 55 is equally easy to use.

Micro Engineering also makes a good line of c55 flex, but it is very stiff, and can be difficult to work with.  They also only offer a #6 turnout.  I do use their bridge track, though.  Very nicely detailed.

 

Another advantage of the Atlas system is a very comprehensive selection of sectional track, with a wide variety of curves, crossovers and short straight pieces.  They are also releasing a re-rail track shortly.  It really is the best bang for the buck.

Lee 

Route of the Alpha Jets  www.wmrywesternlines.net

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Fort Worth, Texas
  • 73 posts
Posted by JWARNELL on Thursday, December 4, 2008 6:57 PM

 I am not sure about the comparison of prices, but I used PECO code 55 on the one N-Scale layout that I built and would not hesitate to use it again. It was very easy to work with. It held its shape "curve" pretty well and looked great after it was glued down. I had about a hundred freight cars and only found one that the wheel flanges were too big to track properly. I think it was an older roundhouse car, but it was about eight years ago and I don't remember for sure. I think most of the brands of track out there today would be pretty good quality. I would look at some of the more popular brands and go with the one that you find the best deal on.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: On the Banks of the Great Choptank
  • 2,916 posts
Posted by wm3798 on Thursday, December 4, 2008 10:15 PM

 Peco makes a good solid system, the problem with it is the appearance.  The ties are too fat, and spaced too far apart.  It's made in England, so it meets a European standard.  Looks way off for US specs.

Lee 

Route of the Alpha Jets  www.wmrywesternlines.net

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!