Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Kadee vs. McHenry Couplers

3866 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • 130 posts
Posted by bn7026 on Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:49 PM
I've been using kadees longer than I care to remember - tried others, but always come back to the old #5. Nowadays I don't use the magnetic feature (it's not prototypical anyway) so I also cut off the curved trip pin and use skewers for uncoupling.
Modelling Burlington Northern in Perth, Western Australia NCE DCC user since 1999
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 27, 2004 10:25 PM
I've had experience with installing KD's and though I find the coupler spring setup a bit frustrating at times, it's a lot better than unwanted uncouplings that I get regularly from the McHenry's the LHS talked me into getting. (He was out of #5's) I just ordered more 5's so I can quickly put the McHenry's where they belong. In the junk pile next to the freight car repair facility!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 27, 2004 10:41 PM
Stuck on KD's for 2 main reasons.[:D]
1st, plastic couplers dont store well. if the car slides in the box and puts tension on the coupler, it will take a "set" and basicaly.,its junk from there.[V]
2nd, we regularly run 75-100+ car trains. Plastic couplers will not live long like this. So why bother with them.[;)] Ever hear of a KD being pulled apart???
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:58 PM
hey timbowa -- I gotta kid you on this one - you state that you "cut off the curved trip pin because it isn't prototypical anyway and use skewers instead". Since when are 'skewers' (or 1 : 1 scale fingers) prototypical? Please note that I intend to continue doing same thing as I add more rolling stock to my new layout in the making. . .
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 231 posts
Posted by EMDSD40 on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:04 AM
I have used Kadee #5's on all my HO equipment for the past 25 years with 100% satisfaction. I tried some McHenry type couplers on Walther's ore cars with very poor results. They we're replaced promptly with Kadee couplers. Also had good performance with the conversions for AHM/RIVAROSSI passenger cars. My fleet of rolling stock numbers in the 600+range and locomotives in the 250+ range all equipped with Kadee couplers. I would recommend them hands down. Hope this helps in your decision making process.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Out on the Briny Ocean Tossed
  • 4,240 posts
Posted by Fergmiester on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:27 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by HighIron2003ar

Fergmeister... Your use of the word "Memory" is fantastic. You probably wanted to show that the plastic has fatique and loses tension to the point of being no good.



Thanks for the compliment but case in point since writing the earlier post I bought a Bachmann Silver Series Train Set (passenger Cars). The engine and cars were fitted with Accumates. I hauled the train, up my 6' x 5% curved grade and just as the engine hit the crest, I had a runaway train, Man those coaches go like stink! Anyway after inspecting the couplers and realizing that they were a bit "sloppy" out they came and were replaced by Kadee's. I still had problems and after further inspection realized the Bachmann coupler arrangement, which was linked with the trucks and swivelled when the trucks swiveled[%-)] were slack and moved in an up/down arc. A shim between the coupler box and the car body has solved this. Regardless I haven't much faith in plastic couplers as they are easily fatigued and can't handle the rigours on the MESS.

http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5959

If one could roll back the hands of time... They would be waiting for the next train into the future. A. H. Francey 1921-2007  

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:07 AM
Nothin' beats Kadees...'nuff said.[^]

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!