Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Bridge collapse

1432 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Bridge collapse
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9:58 AM

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:10 AM

"Railroad spokesman Steve Kulm said Wednesday he did not know if the flooding was a factor in the collapse."Dunce [D)] (ya think??)

Good thing those tankers were filled with water and not something toxic that could pollute the river! Bet the engineer wasn't planning on going for a swim!

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Ogden UT
  • 1,055 posts
Posted by PA&ERR on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:17 AM

"For a town already dealing with record flooding, investigators must survey this damage and analyze environmental impact."

Never mind the impact to the railroad, its customers, or the larger community that depend on both!Banged Head [banghead]

-George

"And the sons of Pullman porters and the sons of engineers ride their father's magic carpet made of steel..."

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:03 PM
quote user=PA&ERR

"For a town already dealing with record flooding, investigators must survey this damage and analyze environmental impact."

Never mind the impact to the railroad, its customers, or the larger community that depend on both!Banged Head [banghead]

-George

/quote

Sounds to me as if the major impact is going to be on Tyson - the bridge, and the track on it, were part of the spur to their plant.  (I'll also bet that Tyson is the town's major employer.)

Notice that nobody said a thing about the environmental impact of the thousands of tons of fertilizer washed into the river and whisked downstream - but a leaking diesel fuel tank...Shock [:O]

Thee isn't a bookie in my home town that would take the negative side of a bet that the flood did or did not undermine the bridge foundations.

I'm just glad that nobody got killed.  Pulling the rolling stock out of the mud will be fun, though.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: northern nj
  • 2,477 posts
Posted by lvanhen on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:13 PM
 loathar wrote:

"Railroad spokesman Steve Kulm said Wednesday he did not know if the flooding was a factor in the collapse."Dunce [D)] (ya think??)

Good thing those tankers were filled with water and not something toxic that could pollute the river! Bet the engineer wasn't planning on going for a swim!

Mr Kulm needs to grasp both ears and yank hard to get his head from wence it is lodged!!Mischief [:-,]

Lou V H Photo by John
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 1:46 PM
Odd how the media always calls tank cars "tanker cars". I suppose they're more familiar with tanker trucks??
Stix
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:07 PM

Mr. Kulm doesn't know if the flooding contributed to the collapse?  Well, DUH---! Dunce [D)]

Tom Whistling [:-^]

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Lilburn, GA
  • 966 posts
Posted by CSXDixieLine on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:15 PM

Yikes..glad to hear the most of the crew is ok and the hurt person will fully recover. Here is the bridge in question:

http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=41.283037&lon=-91.347048&z=17.1&r=0&src=msa

Looks like it is immediately downstream from the confluence of the two rivers. Jamie

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Sunny SoCal
  • 423 posts
Posted by Margaritaman on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:44 PM
So they filled the tanks with water to weight the bridge to keep it in place?  Common practice?
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:37 PM

 Margaritaman wrote:
So they filled the tanks with water to weight the bridge to keep it in place?  Common practice?

 

That is a common practice for many years. Usually hopper cars with rock were used. In a 1955 huricane in New England, a railroad bridge over the CT river in Holyoke MA had hopper cars on it with rock inside the cars. I lived near the river and recall asking my father why as I had never seen this before.

Rich 

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:47 PM
This practice has been around since at least 1920's....I have a picture of the D&RGW placing hopper flats on a steel bridge to keep from flowing away  would scan it..it is copyrighted though
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Hot'lanta, Gawga
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Rotorranch on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:15 PM

 k4driver1361 wrote:
This practice has been around since at least 1920's....I have a picture of the D&RGW placing hopper flats on a steel bridge to keep from flowing away  would scan it..it is copyrighted though

Even before that! There's a site with old photos of St.L MO from the late 1800's early 1900's, showing loaded cars on a bridge trying to keep The River from washing the bridge away.

Rotor

 Jake: How often does the train go by? Elwood: So often you won't even notice ...

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5:55 PM
 Rotorranch wrote:

 k4driver1361 wrote:
This practice has been around since at least 1920's....I have a picture of the D&RGW placing hopper flats on a steel bridge to keep from flowing away  would scan it..it is copyrighted though

Even before that! There's a site with old photos of St.L MO from the late 1800's early 1900's, showing loaded cars on a bridge trying to keep The River from washing the bridge away.

Rotor

They put a steam train and passenger cars full of people on the bridge that went to the Fl. Keys during a hurricane about 100 years....(that didn't work either...Sigh [sigh])

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 6:05 PM

I have been to the Keys quite a lot and seen the history. The train was sent to remove workers for the railroad, not to keep a bridge in place. Search using Google. Flaglers railroad. With no tracking like we have today, authorities had to guess.

Rich 

 

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,207 posts
Posted by stebbycentral on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 6:09 PM
Oddly enough as I am reading this thread there is also a story running on the local news about the incident.  Apparently the ICE locomotive was in the process of removing the cars from the bridge when it went down.  It sounds from the reports that the part that actually collapsed was the trestle approach to the bridge.  The engineer of the locomotive is currently in the University of Iowa Hospitals in Iowa City with what are described as "non-life threatening" injuries.

I have figured out what is wrong with my brain!  On the left side nothing works right, and on the right side there is nothing left!

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 6:10 PM
That would be pretty sickening if they actually did that.  As for the current story I am glad to hear everyone is all right.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 8:17 PM
 twhite wrote:

Mr. Kulm doesn't know if the flooding contributed to the collapse?  Well, DUH---! Dunce [D)]

Tom Whistling [:-^]

I saw pictures of it on the news, and I would side with Mr. Kulm.  It looks like the cars went through the deck of the bridge, not like the piers collapsed from under the cars.  They need to find out what was the cause and not just blame it on the handy reason of the flood.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:06 AM

 wjstix wrote:
Odd how the media always calls tank cars "tanker cars". I suppose they're more familiar with tanker trucks??

Our local NBC affiliate gave us some views of the wreckage (close-ups, not an overall view) and I noticed that one of the tank ends was stenciled inedible grease.  I'll bet water is the cleanest thing that car has ever had in it!

Being a nautical type, when I see the word, "Tanker," my mind automatically conjures up a long, wide, deep, oceangoing ship with a deckful of plumbing and the bridge and stack all the way aft.  That thing on rubber wheels is a tank truck.

The other accepted meaning of the word tanker involves soldiers who ride around in large tracked vehicles with big, accurate artillery in rotating turrets...

As for what the media says, I'm glad that television provides pictures.  Kung Fu-Tse was right.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,207 posts
Posted by stebbycentral on Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:34 AM
 dehusman wrote:
 twhite wrote:

Mr. Kulm doesn't know if the flooding contributed to the collapse?  Well, DUH---! Dunce [D)]

Tom Whistling [:-^]

I saw pictures of it on the news, and I would side with Mr. Kulm.  It looks like the cars went through the deck of the bridge, not like the piers collapsed from under the cars.  They need to find out what was the cause and not just blame it on the handy reason of the flood.

Dave H.

There was additional film on this morning's news. Fom the pictures it was obvious that what collapsed wasn't really a bridge at all, but a trestle.  It could be that the flood undermined the piers, but I wonder if the ground wasn't simply so waterlogged that it couldn't support the weight of the locomotive.

I have figured out what is wrong with my brain!  On the left side nothing works right, and on the right side there is nothing left!

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Plum Branch, SC
  • 67 posts
Posted by Cornboy on Thursday, June 26, 2008 7:18 AM

Hi y'all,

Since this is the model formum an not the rl trains forum I was wondering if anyone ever added things like collapsed bridges, flooding, derailments, etc. to their layouts.  I'm completely new to this and my personal layout is still being formed in my rapidly aging brain.  It just seems like it might be something that would add interest to a layout.

Cheers,

Doug

“Whither goest thou, America, in thy shiny car in the night?” -Jack Kerouac
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:37 AM
 Cornboy wrote:

Hi y'all,

Since this is the model formum an not the rl trains forum I was wondering if anyone ever added things like collapsed bridges, flooding, derailments, etc. to their layouts.  I'm completely new to this and my personal layout is still being formed in my rapidly aging brain.  It just seems like it might be something that would add interest to a layout.

Cheers,

Doug

I've seen photos of staged 'picking up the pieces' photos, usually involving an Athearn 250 ton crane and a bunch of minipeople.  Highway wreck photos are more common.

Back when I was learning to shave, MR (I think) had a photo article on a modeler who built dioramas of early 20th century derailments in all their gory glory - overturned steam, splintered wooden cars and all.

While my prototype has had some spectacular, and deadly, derailments, none of them happened in my modeled area during September, 1964.  Ditto for washouts and bridge collapses.  I hope to model that fact with extreme accuracy.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - wreck-free, I hope)

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:25 AM

Here is a link to a short video of the collapse.

http://www.muscatinejournal.com/articles/2008/06/25/news/doc48625ad72a95a530197603.txt

Scroll down and click of the video link.

Rich 

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:58 AM
 richg1998 wrote:

I have been to the Keys quite a lot and seen the history. The train was sent to remove workers for the railroad, not to keep a bridge in place. Search using Google. Flaglers railroad. With no tracking like we have today, authorities had to guess.

Rich 

 

Yeah, I know the story. Just my dry sense of humor...

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!