Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Model Power - Metal Trains

14738 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 2,314 posts
Model Power - Metal Trains
Posted by don7 on Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:37 PM

I was in the LHS and came across a box car labeled Metal Train made by Model Power.

To say the least the car is heavy being of all metal construction. I am informed there are  F7A units as well as an assortment of freight cars as well.

What are these like as far as quality and detail. Being all metal construction I would imagine that the weight would be problematic as to layouts with inclines/grades. 

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Middleton WI (West of Madison)
  • 140 posts
Posted by mj5890 on Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:49 PM

I have two of these cars, on is a single dome tanker and the other a BNSF ballast hopper.  Both run good, are at the correct height for a KD #5 and atleast mine came with metal wheels.  The detail however lacks quite a bit,  they are a couple steps below an athearn BB in detail.  They are also very heavy but I haven't had any problems with them, but I have no grade more than .5% so I couldnt really say for sure.

 

Joe

 

1 BNSF 2 Amtrak 3 UP 4 everybody else I try really hard not to have to try hard at anything hard at all because that would be hard I never recommend my recommendations
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:55 PM
I have a CP Rail caboose. It does lack detail, as all the grabs and such are molded on, but with a little weathering I can live with it. It is one of the best running pieces of rolling stock I have.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Chicagoland
  • 465 posts
Posted by cbq9911a on Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:39 PM

The Metal Train cars have OK detailing but they're very heavy and they're good runners.

If the Metal Train F7 has the same mechanism as the other Model Power F units (ex Marx tooling); you'll have an OK runner but definitely not a Kato or Atlas.  But the weight should make it a stump puller. 

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Thursday, June 19, 2008 6:26 PM
A friend of mine had an old metal engine if I recall, can't remember what it was but it was always interesting.  I would guess these are collectible now.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 2,314 posts
Posted by don7 on Thursday, June 19, 2008 6:46 PM

 trainfan1221 wrote:
A friend of mine had an old metal engine if I recall, can't remember what it was but it was always interesting.  I would guess these are collectible now.

Which is collectable?

We are talking about new stock items.

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Bracebridge, ON
  • 235 posts
Posted by mactier_hogger on Sunday, April 3, 2011 7:41 PM

I purchased a Metal Train Christmas set this past December and while it was alright initialy it is becoming quite a nuisance as time wears on. A couple of the cars need new wheel sets, one needs a truck replacement, but the most annoying thing is the F7 that came with it. It constantly derails at the same spots around the layout. Nothing else I run derails at those spots. I'm thinking it must be flange height as the wheels and track are in gauge. I am really disappointed with it since it is DCC ready, thought I could easily make it run on my Christmas layout!!

Dean

30 years 1:1 Canadian Pacific.....now switching in HOSmile

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,847 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Sunday, April 3, 2011 8:17 PM

  I picked up some of the 53' flat cars when a LHS was going out of business.  The weight was a 'plus' for an empty HO flat car.  I did get a reefer and a hopper as well - way too heavy!

Jim

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Bracebridge, ON
  • 235 posts
Posted by mactier_hogger on Monday, April 4, 2011 7:46 AM

Yes, the flat car is nice. Everything else is way to heavy! the F7 is a nightmare.

Dean

30 years 1:1 Canadian Pacific.....now switching in HOSmile

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 599 posts
Posted by Milepost 266.2 on Monday, April 4, 2011 7:54 AM

I bought a few of these to use at the club.  They're pretty much indestructible.  Not terribly detailed, but for this purpose that's not a real problem. 

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Jersey City
  • 1,925 posts
Posted by steemtrayn on Monday, April 4, 2011 10:05 AM

Metaltrain F next to Genesis:

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Jersey City
  • 1,925 posts
Posted by steemtrayn on Monday, April 4, 2011 10:10 AM

MetaiTrain F's upgrade with 50 cars:

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: San Diego
  • 954 posts
Posted by stokesda on Monday, April 4, 2011 11:38 AM

Seems to me one of the biggest disadvantages of the metal trains, the F-units in particular, is the difficulty in superdetailing or modifying the shell for prototype-specific details. Case in point, check out the side-by-side F-unit photo posted above. Consider the effort required to replace the "grab iron" on the side of the nose door with a piece of wire. I don't want to even think about the effort involved with something more substantial like blanking off dynamic brake fans or replacing the pilots Dead

On the other hand, the truck sideframes do seem reasonably detailed. At least they appear to pass the 3-foot rule.

The metal shell seems to be kind of a gimmick. Yeah, it weighs more than plastic and helps tractive effort for locos, but you can add weight inside a plastic shell (or even brass shell). Ultimately it's a tradeoff between performance and appearance. Personally, I'm willing to compromise a little on weight (performance) in order to have more accurate detail. To each his own, though.

Dan Stokes

My other car is a tunnel motor

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Bracebridge, ON
  • 235 posts
Posted by mactier_hogger on Monday, April 4, 2011 12:48 PM

That's a great looking layout you have started!! So you have no problems running the metal F7? Mine would have jumped the track long before the end of the video!

Dean

30 years 1:1 Canadian Pacific.....now switching in HOSmile

  • Member since
    January 2012
  • 1 posts
Posted by Keith07 on Friday, January 20, 2012 4:21 AM

I purchased a F7 metal train  and had the opposite result. Found where some of my loco"s derailed the F7 went over the track with no problems. Very good puller of freight wagons. The only complant is that it is abit noisy at times.

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • 4,367 posts
Posted by Darth Santa Fe on Friday, January 20, 2012 8:00 PM

I've never been too impressed with the looks of the Metaltrain F7. It looked alright in the pictures, but I've seen them up close, and even the old Tyco F7 looks quite a bit better to me.

Model Power diesel drives are hit and miss. They can be very smooth runners, or terrible runners.

But what will the ultimate metal F unit always be? A Cary body with a Hobbytown chassis! Good looking, super heavy, smooth running, and indestructible!Big Smile

_________________________________________________________________

  • Member since
    October 2013
  • 4 posts
Posted by kimballthurlow on Thursday, October 10, 2013 3:14 AM

Hi,

For myself, being into model railroads, means just that. These are toys, I play with them. The Model Power metal F7 is perfect for me, because it looks good from a distance, and is made with the stuff they made toys of years ago - metal. Yes molded on hand rails are old fashioned, but from 3 feet, you don't notice. Model Power have used modern CAD technology to design these. Combined with Chinese manufacture, at around $50, they represent great value, and run smoothly.

regards

Kimball

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Staten Island NY
  • 1,734 posts
Posted by joe323 on Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:58 AM

I have 2 of the metal cars.  an ATSF Tanker and a Hopper which I believe is also ATSF.  have not used the hopper much except as a basin for small parts, but the tanker runs well especially after I changed the couplers to kadee #5's

Joe Staten Island West 

  • Member since
    October 2013
  • 4 posts
Posted by kimballthurlow on Thursday, October 10, 2013 3:08 PM

I think the hopper model, is one designed for carrying and discharging track ballast. Rarely modeled by anyone.

Model Power are attempting unusual stuff. In Europe, only the high end manufacturers use metal (think Marklin and HAG), and even Liliput (a Bachmann brand) has a go with some models. Regards, Kimball..

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Detroit, Michigan
  • 2,284 posts
Posted by Soo Line fan on Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:48 PM

Model Power also has one of the most unique service policy's in the hobby. If it breaks, simply send it back and Michael Dead in service will make sure it gets fixed lost.

Jim

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Friday, October 11, 2013 1:49 AM

Jim,

He's no longer,in the service Dept., He's in charge of,  ''Lost-N-Found....Smile, Wink & Grin

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Alabama
  • 1,077 posts
Posted by cjcrescent on Friday, October 11, 2013 4:45 PM

Darth Santa Fe

...

But what will the ultimate metal F unit always be? A Cary body with a Hobbytown chassis! Good looking, super heavy, smooth running, and indestructible!Big Smile

Couldn't agree more, Darth! I've had 125 cars behind mine. Could have put more, but I ran out of cars at the show.

Carey

Keep it between the Rails

Alabama Central Homepage

Nara member #128

NMRA &SER Life member

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: West Australia
  • 2,217 posts
Posted by John Busby on Friday, October 11, 2013 7:37 PM

Hi all

I read this with interest.

There was a time when a RTR die cast metal body and a few polished brass pretty bits was a sign of a High quality loco.

I think Hornby Dublo when I think of these.

I am sure the US had its equivalent  Highly regarded and respected brand for HO.

In the early days that would have been the product of choice inspite of what would have been the Very high price for the time.

I see these kind of modern products as a nostalgia thing and often not as good as the real deal was.

On the other hand if you can get a yard switcher of the time in good working order live with the lack by modern standards of detail and no DCC it won't let you down as far as switching the yard goes.

You won't be able to overload a main line loco using modern freight stock either

regards John

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Detroit, Michigan
  • 2,284 posts
Posted by Soo Line fan on Friday, October 11, 2013 7:38 PM

zstripe

Jim,

He's no longer,in the service Dept., He's in charge of,  ''Lost-N-Found....Smile, Wink & Grin

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

Good, maybe Model power can tell him to get "lost."

Then a good service guy can be "found,"

Jim

  • Member since
    October 2013
  • 4 posts
Posted by kimballthurlow on Monday, October 14, 2013 8:36 PM

John Busby

Hi all

I read this with interest.

There was a time when a RTR die cast metal body and a few polished brass pretty bits was a sign of a High quality loco.

I think Hornby Dublo when I think of these.

I am sure the US had its equivalent  Highly regarded and respected brand for HO.

In the early days that would have been the product of choice inspite of what would have been the Very high price for the time.

I see these kind of modern products as a nostalgia thing .......

regards John

Hi John, and Darth Santa Fe,

I agree with you both. Yes Cary bodies were great, but you are unable to get one now. And same with the Hobbytime chassis. Hornby Dublo are common and easily purchased, I have 9 of them. I could not afford them when I was young. 

Unfortunately for the Model Power brand name, the "Metal Train" are now heavily discounted, which goes to show that salesmen are no longer salesmen. That loco could be promoted, but the hobby is obsessed with small clip-on details that fall off, or you don't notice from a distance.

regards

Kimball

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!