Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

McHenry versus Kadee couplers

24196 views
54 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Canada
  • 145 posts
Posted by Melchoir on Thursday, March 13, 2008 6:20 PM

This has been a good discussion...My final question on this one is reallly quite obivious..Since Kadee is a favorite of most modellers..why mot make it an industry standard of all future RTR equipment. The difference in cost wouldn't be that great and I for one wouldn't mind paying a little extra knowing the quality was there for my money..Any thoughts on this one..

Enjoy your layouts..It's a clean vice we have mates, and one that keeps on giving

Michael

Michael Modelling the Canadian Pacific & Canadian National Railways in Canada's Maritime Provinces
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Saginaw River
  • 948 posts
Posted by jsoderq on Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:58 PM
I will point out there is a lot of stuff that "regular "couplers won't fit which is why Kadee (and only Kadee) has so many different types. Kadee is the only one to take the coupler business seriously. Also, try to get some technical help from McHenry.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 10,198 posts
Posted by howmus on Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:41 PM
Like most everybody else, I only use Kadees.  Every new car that goes on my layout gets both Kadee couplers and Kadee trucks with metal wheelsets.  I have had zero problems with either..... ever!

Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO

We'll get there sooner or later! 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 93 posts
Posted by highhood63 on Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:05 PM
I wanted to like Mchenry I really did....but you get what you pay for Kadee all the way. I will say that Mchenry has imrpoved over where they were a couple years back, they still aren't there yet though.
When a habit begins to cost money, it's called a hobby.
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Hot'lanta, Gawga
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Rotorranch on Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:58 PM

Kadee, without a doubt!

Rotor

 Jake: How often does the train go by? Elwood: So often you won't even notice ...

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:50 PM

Boy I bet the competition is feeling beat down after this thread.

BTW: Another vote for Kadee here. Their support is second to none.

 

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • 790 posts
Posted by Tilden on Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:44 PM

  Use the KD's.  I replace other brands immediately, don't even wait for them to fail.  The one exception is my Athearn RTR cars and I haven't found the time to...COMPLETELY DIS-ASSEMBLE THE UNDERSIDE OF THE CAR... just to replace the couplers.

Tilden

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • 1,511 posts
Posted by pastorbob on Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:46 PM

At last count on the computer data base, around 1710 freight cars on my Santa Fe, on the railroad, on storage tracks, on shelves, all have Kadee wouldn't touch anything else.  Some of the cars are well over 20 years old, the Kadees still run as they did from day one.

Bob

Bob Miller http://www.atsfmodelrailroads.com/
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 735 posts
Posted by wgnrr on Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:28 PM

Any coupler with a knuckle spring with a piece of plastic is junk.

My favorite coupler to work with is the McHenry scale coupler, which is the equivilent of the Kadee #58 (I think that's it). Why my favorite? Never failed on me, good price, spring in the knuckle, I have bought a ton of them, and have them to work with all of the time.

If you are running trains longer than 15 cars, Kadees are the best choice as they will last longer.

However, for a person like me who runs trains that are about 10-15 cars max, I like the McHenry scale coupler.

I find #5s too hard to work with on many cars, i.e. the copper centering spring. I want to get some whisker couplers from Kadee, but since the actual running of my engines and cars are second to detail and display, Kadees are not often bought.

Phil

My Photo Albums: http://s84.photobucket.com/albums/k32/martin_lumber/ http://tinyurl.com/3yzns6
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:21 PM
 BRAKIE wrote:

I field tested the McHenry scale coupler (that the one with a metal knuckle spring) at the club and it worked ok for awhile..However the coupler was prone to the knuckle collapsing while shoving long cuts of stock weight(not RP20.1 weighted) cars during yard switching..

The KD remains the best coupler.

 

Sign - Ditto [#ditto], and with cuts that jerk like a caterpillar.  I use them until they p. me off the first time, and then they get yanked for Kadees.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: BC, CANADA
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Pathfinder on Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:19 PM

 Melchoir wrote:
Since I think I have a lot of probably # 5 Kadees on other rollinh stock..would a # 5 work ok as a replacement instead of the McHenryies..Is # 58 Kadee their scale version and their # 5 everybody's favorite...Thought I would just ask

Yes, the 58 is the scale version while the 5 is the do almost everything version.  But each set up is different so you may need one of KDs other ones.  For example, on my Atlas FP7 I have to use an offset shank (can't remember the no.) as the mounting is very low.

Keep on Trucking, By Train! Where I Live: BC Hobbies: Model Railroading (HO): CP in the 70's in BC and logging in BC
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Canada
  • 145 posts
Posted by Melchoir on Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:18 PM
Since I think I have a lot of probably # 5 Kadees on other rollinh stock..would a # 5 work ok as a replacement instead of the McHenryies..Is # 58 Kadee their scale version and their # 5 everybody's favorite...Thought I would just ask
Michael Modelling the Canadian Pacific & Canadian National Railways in Canada's Maritime Provinces
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Oregon
  • 509 posts
Posted by Mr. SP on Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:18 PM

Kadee is the ONLY coupler to use. The Maybee Mates are just junk. The plastic is slippery and soft and just dosen't hold up. Our club has outlawed the imposters and the horney-hooks too.

Be sure to install the Kadee's with the height gauge. Allow for maintenance or repair with your instalation too. Never know when a derailment or other mishap might break a coupler. I use Kadee trucks on my rolling stock where Kadee makes a correct truck.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Kansas
  • 808 posts
Posted by jamnest on Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:16 PM

KDs for me.  I tried the McHenry and Accumate.  Thought I was going to save money.  I ended up spending more money and time by replacing them with KDs.

One protypical note about the McHenry copulers.  I model the KCS and was experimenting with different grades versus length of trains as I am planning a helper district.  I had four Athearn BB SD40-2 pulling a 45 car train up a 2.5% grade.  The train came apart.  The McHenery coupler failed and broke apart from the strain.  Same problems the prototype KCS had.  The KCS used to run 6 to 8  F3/7 units to pull long freights over the mountains.  They now use helper units.  I replaced the broken coupler several times as I had a bulk pack and they failed several more times.  This has not been a problem with KDs. 

Jim, Modeling the Kansas City Southern Lines in HO scale.

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Crosby, Texas
  • 3,660 posts
Posted by cwclark on Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:10 PM
  There are a lot of things in this hobby that might work and then again might not. KADEE couplers are one of those things that work and are just plain reliable.   i'd go with the KADEE coupler anyday over the Mchenry and others....chuck

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Orig: Tyler Texas. Lived in seven countries, now live in Sundown, Louisiana
  • 25,640 posts
Posted by jeffrey-wimberly on Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:05 PM

I use McHenry couplers to make a pile of scrap couplers. There's no beating Kadee's for endurance and pulling. On a pull test the Kadee did eventually fail but it failed at a point way beyond what the meter could measure (the meter topped out at 11+ pounds). If you want a scale size coupler, Kadee has that also. The #58 scale size coupler. http://www.kadee.com/htmbord/page351.htm

 

Running Bear, Sundown, Louisiana
          Joined June, 2004

Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running Bear
Space Mouse for president!
15 year veteran fire fighter
Collector of Apple //e's
Running Bear Enterprises
History Channel Club life member.
beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam


  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Canada
  • 145 posts
Posted by Melchoir on Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:58 PM
Thanks for the replies everybody.Just  purchased some new cabooses from True Line Trains and they are nice but come with McHenry couplers on them Couplers are advertised as being to scale but seem a little smaller than # 5 Kadees.
Michael Modelling the Canadian Pacific & Canadian National Railways in Canada's Maritime Provinces
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Shalimar. Florida
  • 2,622 posts
Posted by Packer on Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:48 PM

The only things McHenries have going for them is their price and commonality.

They come with most cars, and only cost around 1.00 a pair, as opposed to kadees which are twice as much. But you'll break dozens of McHenries before a Kadee breaks.

Any one know about the new P2k couplers, btw?

Vincent

Wants: 1. high-quality, sound equipped, SD40-2s, C636s, C30-7s, and F-units in BN. As for ones that don't cost an arm and a leg, that's out of the question....

2. An end to the limited-production and other crap that makes models harder to get and more expensive.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:44 PM

I field tested the McHenry scale coupler (that the one with a metal knuckle spring) at the club and it worked ok for awhile..However the coupler was prone to the knuckle collapsing while shoving long cuts of stock weight(not RP20.1 weighted) cars during yard switching..

The KD remains the best coupler.

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:42 PM
IMHO, the only thing that McHenry had going for it was the built in centering spring. (don't like the brass KD centering springs) But since KD came out with the "Whisker" coupler, there is NO sense in buying McH's. KD even has the shelf couplers out in Whiskers now.
Just waiting on the offset standard head versions...
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: BC, CANADA
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Pathfinder on Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:33 PM
 WSOR 3801 wrote:

Stick with Kadee.  Much less problems.  They last much longer, and are far more durable.  I have tried all the cheapies-McHenry, Intermountain, Accumate- and all have been replaced by Kadee.  Make sure everything matches the coupler gauge.  Kadee 58 are closer to scale size, but are less forgiving of uneven trackwork.

....

 

Sign - Ditto [#ditto]  Same here, tried them all but only the KD's hang in.  I find the plastic KD wannabes too soft and easily broken or deformed. 

Keep on Trucking, By Train! Where I Live: BC Hobbies: Model Railroading (HO): CP in the 70's in BC and logging in BC
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:19 PM

Stick with Kadee.  Much less problems.  They last much longer, and are far more durable.  I have tried all the cheapies-McHenry, Intermountain, Accumate- and all have been replaced by Kadee.  Make sure everything matches the coupler gauge.  Kadee 58 are closer to scale size, but are less forgiving of uneven trackwork.

Sergent Engineering makes scale couplers.  They may or may not couple with Kadee.  They also act like 1:1 scale couplers: have to be opened before coupling, not self-centering, etc.  Some guys like that, but I have enough of that at work.  I prefer to push the cars together and have them couple, and not uncouple until I want them to. 

 

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Canada
  • 145 posts
McHenry versus Kadee couplers
Posted by Melchoir on Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:09 PM
Any thoughts on what is overall the best coupler and what are each couplers strong and weak points.Which coupler is closer to scale and which is more compatible with other couplers? Thanks Michael
Michael Modelling the Canadian Pacific & Canadian National Railways in Canada's Maritime Provinces

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!