At what point are bridge guardrails used (required) ?
I've noticed many railroad bridges over roads don't have them yet many if not all over water do. Is it something based on height or length of the bridge or what they are crossing over ?
Mark.
¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ
That's an interesting question Mark.
Unfortunately, I don't have an answer. Could it have something to do with the probability of human traffic?
Karl
The mind is like a parachute. It works better when it's open. www.stremy.net
My GUESS would be that they are used whenever the loss of property is greater than the cost of installing and maintaining them. Example: If a train derails crossing a highway overpass, the train could fall to the roadway, but is easily cleaned up by cranes and such, and is not likely to cause a LOT of lost revenue. Where as, Like the case of Amtrak a few years ago, if a train derails on a river overpass it could fall into the water, requiering "specilized" clean-up, ie-Divers and Barge Cranes (not highly accessable) or damage a very expensive(cost and lost revenue) bridge.
Just a GUESS.
KingConrail76 wrote:Example: If a train derails crossing a highway overpass, the train could fall to the roadway
Like this?
There were/are guardrails on the bridges here, but those obviously didn't stop the two cars that went off here. Fortunately the only car at the intersection was stopped across the intersection from the crash for the red light.
Kevin
http://chatanuga.org/RailPage.html
http://chatanuga.org/WLMR.html
I guess, they check the chance of a derailment. If you have ballasted track, you may go more easy without guard rails.
I'm looking for someone who knows it!
Wolfgang
Pueblo & Salt Lake RR
Come to us http://www.westportterminal.de my videos my blog
Are we talking guardrails on the sides of the bridges or between the running rails?
We're talking about guardrails between the running rails, not safety railings on the sides.