Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Changing couplers in N scale.

6039 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Brunswick MD
  • 345 posts
Changing couplers in N scale.
Posted by timthechef on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:10 PM
I just changed the couplers on a Bachman switcher for my father tonight and man it was a Task! I installed Microtrains couplers and they are tiny. Makes me real glad I model HO!
Life's too short to eat bad cake
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: On the Banks of the Great Choptank
  • 2,916 posts
Posted by wm3798 on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:36 PM

Bachmann's are notorious for having non-standard coupler boxes.  The higher quality models from Atlas, Kato and Life-like are a lot more straightforward.

Lee 

Route of the Alpha Jets  www.wmrywesternlines.net

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: East central Illinois
  • 2,576 posts
Posted by Cox 47 on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:23 PM
Body mounting is much easier...I just finnished body mounting some hopper cars and they work well and were easy to do....Cox 47
ILLinois and Southern...Serving the Coal belt of southern Illinois with a Smile...
  • Member since
    November 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,720 posts
Posted by MAbruce on Thursday, July 19, 2007 7:37 AM

Is it being said that it's easier to body mount a loco that came with truck mounted couplers (as stated in the original post)? Confused [%-)]  That doesn't sound right to me.  I think people are mixing up locos with freight cars.

Most N-scale locos these days come with body mounted couplers.  They are generally easy to swap out for MT's (standard 1015/1016).  In fact, it takes minutes if you get the pre-assembled couplers (1015-1). 

The other day I converted a LL SW8 and an LL SD9 to MT's.  I could not find the pre-assembled 1015-1's at my LHS, so I had to get the unassembled pack and put them together myself.  95 percent of my conversion time was spent on assembling the couplers.  Once put together, they easily went into the loco without having to take off the shells.

Although it was not too hard assembling the couplers (the spring assembly was the worst part), I'd advise spending the couple of extra dollars to buy the pre-assembled couplers.      

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Brunswick MD
  • 345 posts
Posted by timthechef on Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:29 PM
I didn't know the pre assembled ones where availabe. Next time I will have to look for them. This is the first time I've done anything with N gauge. Tonight we are going to do his Atlas SD 40. I'll let you know how that goes.
Life's too short to eat bad cake
  • Member since
    November 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,720 posts
Posted by MAbruce on Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:16 PM

 timthechef wrote:
I didn't know the pre assembled ones where availabe. Next time I will have to look for them. This is the first time I've done anything with N gauge. Tonight we are going to do his Atlas SD 40. I'll let you know how that goes.

Just to clarify, MT sells pre-assembled body mounted loco couplers (1015-1) only.  If you are converting an older truck mounted coupler (as you did with the Bachmann switcher), then I don't think they come pre-assembled.  I don't have any experience converting these older units, but have heard that it can be a pain.

Atlas never made an SD-40 in N-scale.  Maybe you're thinking of their SD-45, which is a real oldie.  Good luck with that if that's what you have. Banged Head [banghead]Wink [;)]  Maybe you can get a newer Kato SD-40 instead and not even have to convert the couplers? 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Brunswick MD
  • 345 posts
Posted by timthechef on Sunday, July 22, 2007 8:09 AM

I'm sorry to say that I made a mistake. It's not an SD-40, it's a GP-40. I'm not great with deisels. I used the MT chart in the store to choose the conversion kit, but I think that I got the wrong one (1110). I was able to change the couplers but not able to use the adapter piece. The coupler seem to have too much up and down movement. My Dad is taking it home and we'll see how it works. If it doesn't I'll have to fix it when I go and see him in December.

Thanks again for all your help. I can always count on this forum to have the answers when I need them. 

Life's too short to eat bad cake
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 76 posts
Posted by mavrick0 on Sunday, July 22, 2007 9:02 AM

Atlas's GP40's are body mounted couplers and will take a 1015 with one of the supplied shims on the top of the coupler box for installation.  The 1110 is, according to my MT book, at truck mounted coupler.  Is this a really, old GP40?

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Brunswick MD
  • 345 posts
Posted by timthechef on Sunday, July 22, 2007 2:36 PM
I'm not sure how old it is but the couplers where truck mounted, not body mounted. I had to remove the entire body to get to the trucks to mount the couplers. It's a high hood GP-40 and It was made by Life Like, not Atlas. My mistake for saying it was an Atlas. I had the whole thing wrong. Must have been squinting too much durring the operation!
Life's too short to eat bad cake
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 76 posts
Posted by mavrick0 on Monday, July 23, 2007 7:34 PM
Ah ok... that makes more sense now...

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!