Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
General Discussion (Model Railroader)
»
Starting over
Starting over
13286 views
97 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
1
2
3
4
fwright
Member since
November 2002
From: Colorado
4,075 posts
Posted by
fwright
on Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:25 AM
Currently use HO/HOn3 in a small switching layout, primarily due to time constraints but space constraints are a factor too. Also have a considerable amount of Lionel/O tinplate for Christmas displays and the like. Have been very tempted to try a high rail O tinplate/On30 combination layout but the sizes of reasonably scaled buildings is daunting. Shrinking the structures enough to fit the space and time results in too much carcicature and not enough realism for me - truly the only thing holding me back from switching. Advantages of switching would be easier on the eyes, space for DCC in the locomotives, and easier track work - I lay my own, except for the high rail where the Atlas track system is pretty darn realistic for tinplate!
Fred Wright
Reply
detting
Member since
August 2003
From: PRR Mainline
118 posts
Posted by
detting
on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:02 PM
I think that S is the best size for trains, small enough to run a good size train, but big enough to superdetail. I'd be there if it weren't for my investment in HO!
Later...
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:46 AM
I would switch to a largetr scale. HO is about as small as I can work with and not go insane handling the detail parts. But also doing a 1/24 scale Gauge III track garden line. If I were to start over, I would almsot exclusivly work in that scale.
Reply
Edit
deevs
Member since
April 2002
From: US
23 posts
Posted by
deevs
on Saturday, November 1, 2003 7:52 AM
I would switch to A garden railroad
Deevs Chief coffee drinker for the DETROIT-VASSAR-SAGINAW R R NARA member # 84
Reply
64ss283
Member since
January 2003
From: CANADA
12 posts
Posted by
64ss283
on Saturday, November 1, 2003 2:08 PM
For me N Scale all the way, in CP, CN, BCR.
Brent
Reply
preceng
Member since
August 2003
From: Pittsburgh, PA
208 posts
Posted by
preceng
on Saturday, November 1, 2003 6:00 PM
Started in HO. Still there. I have often wondered if I had lots more space, would I want to move up (in size that is). I believe I would stay in HO, and just have lots more trains and routes.
Good question. What if money and space were not issues. What would we start out with?
Allan B.
Reply
METRO
Member since
October 2003
From: Milwaukee & Toronto
929 posts
Posted by
METRO
on Sunday, November 2, 2003 1:22 AM
I'd still stick with HO scale. At the same time though I wouldn't mind a seccond N scale layout, maybe of the Japanese bullet trains that Kato has come out with.
Reply
eastcoast
Member since
October 2012
527 posts
Posted by
eastcoast
on Monday, November 3, 2003 9:20 AM
I had to start over every time I moved. I have started over so many times that my benchwork is recycled from the last layout. My current layout is now thankfully permanent(I bought a house to fit my layout) and has so many different styles I can't count. I mixed L-girder with butt joint and etc.,etc. I am happy with the results.
Reply
1
2
3
4
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up