Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Yuck it up...Burned on eBay---Resolved

5413 views
51 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 11:30 AM
I purchased once, item was stated quality, however, they tried to collect three times after I had already sent payment and receipt was received. Now I do not waste time fwith e-bay.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 11:40 AM
Spacemouse, Be aware that generally when bad feed back is given, it is reciprocated by the other side. In the end you both loose. The feed back forum part of Ebay is the weakest link in the system (my opinion is it is worthless). They state retaliatory feed back should not be given. However, the only bad feed backs I've ever gotten were exactly that! I'm not saying it shouldn't be used, I'm saying prepare for the consequences!
In my opinion, you didn't know enough (due diligence) about what you were buying, and the onus for the purchase is completely yours.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 12:04 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by DeSchane

Spacemouse, Be aware that generally when bad feed back is given, it is reciprocated by the other side. In the end you both loose. The feed back forum part of Ebay is the weakest link in the system (my opinion is it is worthless). They state retaliatory feed back should not be given. However, the only bad feed backs I've ever gotten were exactly that! I'm not saying it shouldn't be used, I'm saying prepare for the consequences!
In my opinion, you didn't know enough (due diligence) about what you were buying, and the onus for the purchase is completely yours.


I thought about that.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 4:31 PM
I still stand by my thinking that I would not have bidded on this engine. However this is a learning experience for all involved. We managed to identify numerous issues related to this sale and identified the engines.

Now.. what are you going to do with that big Dummy Black loco?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 4:57 PM
I believe that Lindberg got into the HO market by purchasing the assets of Revell, who made the switcher about 1957. So this switcher is really a 1957 technology model. Repowering would require obtaining a drive train to go along with a new motor. The belt system just never made the units quiet or smooth.

A company by the name of Lindsay built a SW switcher about the same time that Revell came out with their models. The Lindsay drive is a beauty and very smooth. I would think that you could repower with a Lindsay chassis, but the Lindsay body is better than the Revell so you would really just be spinning your wheels.

Athearn makes a great running little switcher similar to the Lindberg that can be bought for $5-10 used and will run reliably for the next 50 years. I would just clean up the Lindberg, get it to run as good as you could, and enjoy your model even with its quirks. For price and quality you just can't beat Athearn and if you enjoy having diesel locomotives without the expense of the more highly detailed models the Athearn engines in the blue boxes will give you hours of enjoyable operation at a very low cost. All wheels are powered on Athearn diesels and all wheels pick up current so they run quite nicely right out of the box and will pull more cars than you probably would have a layout to handle.


After making the above statement regarding Revell and thinking further about the Revell model the Revell was a SW-7 that had all 8 wheels powered, not a great system, but it worked. The Lindberg model is an SW-1. I would swear that Lindberg either purchased the dies for this engine or picked up the drive train from another manufacturer. At the time that the belt drive came out on the SW-1 a couple of other manufacturers had been using the same design to power their diesels. Can anyone shed any more light on the history of the SW-1. I believe that after Revell got out of the HO model train business that some of their products were offered by another manufacturer. Somewhere in this scheme of things is Lionel HO, which might have been the company that also used a spring drive on some of their models. Revell-Lionel????
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Saginaw River
  • 948 posts
Posted by jsoderq on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 5:48 PM
The Revell tooling went to ConCor. I know, I worked for them. The Lindsay tooling predates the Revell tooling, actually going back to the 50's. The Revell drives were similar to the early Varney - plastic gears and truck gear boxes. One other belt drive was used by Walthers in their interurban drives. There may have been others -perhaps some of the brass dealers.
Lindsay actually made drive units similar to Hobbytown and diecast diesel bodies - Alco FA's, a small industrial switcher and maybe sharknoses ( I have one but not positive it was Lindsay.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: North Carolina
  • 1,905 posts
Posted by csxns on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 5:54 PM
You sure got reemed on that one.

Russell

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 3,864 posts
Posted by Don Gibson on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 6:02 PM
All sales final?

Your 40 year old iiems should have been listed '"as is" - Listing as 'MINT' not acceptable.

Demand return (AT YOUR EXPENSE) or report to EBAY.

Get a used KATO switcher or new STEWART for $50

Don Gibson .............. ________ _______ I I__()____||__| ||||| I / I ((|__|----------| | |||||||||| I ______ I // o--O O O O-----o o OO-------OO ###########################
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Eastern Nebraska
  • 166 posts
Posted by SP4449 on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 7:40 PM
I bought some Lindsay freight trucks back in the late 70s that had plastic sideframes and wheels, metal axles and springs in the bolsters similar to the Kadee and Athearn trucks of the time. The big difference in quality is that the Lindsay truck sideframes would not stay true due to the springing arrangement and the wheels would not track well.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 7:52 PM
Sellers Reply to my Email.

I am so Sorry I am not really sure what to do accept try to make you Happy so if you want me to refund you I will be more then Happy or if your still interested in keeping the Trains I will mail you a discount of your choice, you just tell me the amount. I am Truly sorry the Trains were my Granfather who just passed away and I sold them as best as i could describe them I am really Honest and IN NO WAY ARE TRYING TO GET OVER ON YOU FOR A SALE I HAVE REALLY GREAT FEED BACK AND WOULD LIKE TO KEEP IT THAT WAY SO PLEASE EmAIL ME AND TELL ME HOW I CAN MAKE THIS SITUATION A BETTER ONE PLEASE.

So what would you guys do?

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 7:58 PM
I'm not sure which option I would take but it sure feels good to see the seller responding in the manner that he did. Good luck.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: North Carolina
  • 1,905 posts
Posted by csxns on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 8:05 PM
I say let it go that is a good person to do that.And take it as a lesson.

Russell

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 8:06 PM
Well, Do you want to keep the engines? If so, he offered you a discount, take it!
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 9:49 PM
I wrote him back. Asked him what else was in his grandfather's train box that could make up the difference.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 10:04 PM
Chip:

Good move! You might get some junk or you might pick up a jewel. ........... Well, it could happen. [swg]

Good luck,
Chuck

Chuck
Allen, TX

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Northern Indiana
  • 1,000 posts
Posted by PennsyHoosier on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 10:07 PM
You certainly won't be any worse off than you were. [:D]
Lawrence, The Pennsy Hoosier
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 11:05 PM
I suggested that I would keep the SW1 as a symbol of my ignorance and donate the broken rolling stock to my local train club. He's going to split the differnece with me and send a check for $19.

AS you can see, I now where the SW1 as part of my trains.com personality.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 6, 2005 1:34 AM
Well. That settles it all then.[^]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 7, 2005 4:21 AM
They look like candidates for a wreck on your layout. Got any canyons that need some decor?
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 785 posts
Posted by Leon Silverman on Friday, January 7, 2005 12:34 PM
Spacemouse:
A new transformer probably will improve the overall operation of your layout but not this engine. The only other manufacturer of that era that used rubber band drive was Athearn and they were characteristically extremely fast at full voltage and jerky at lower speeds. Their minimum speed at the lowest voltages was also quite high. By comparison, other manufacturers turned the axles with worm drives instead of the helical gear drives used today.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 3,864 posts
Posted by Don Gibson on Friday, January 7, 2005 1:10 PM
One can short circuit one's inexperience by having a GOOD point of reference.

Get youself a used STEWART VO-1000 on E Bay amd you'll go from the 'rediculous' to the 'sublime, plus You'll have an engine to judge others by.

Be advised these can be boght NEW for $75 but require some time spent doing assembly work. A USED one might have that all done..
Don Gibson .............. ________ _______ I I__()____||__| ||||| I / I ((|__|----------| | |||||||||| I ______ I // o--O O O O-----o o OO-------OO ###########################
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, January 7, 2005 1:41 PM
I did just that only not so big. I'm only running a 4x8 with about 50' of track. I got a Tech II 1400. I talk about it here.

http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=27960

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!