Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Revell Interlocking Tower

2968 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Ohio
  • 98 posts
Revell Interlocking Tower
Posted by NYC-Big 4 on Sunday, April 19, 2009 10:23 PM

Looking for opinions:  I have an unbuilt Revell Interlocking Tower kit number T-9003 that I bought probably around 1962/63.  The box has a copyright date of 1960 and the directions 1958.  I know I paid $0.98 plus tax for it because back in those days the price was printed on the box with model number.  All the parts, decals and prepainted figures are in the kit.

Anyway, I have been in the process of building another layout and was trying to figure out what other buildings I had from previous layouts to use for the yard tower and happen to remember I still had this kit stored away, along with others from my younger years.  From what I have researched this kit could be considered rare, if not, it's definitely vintage.  The tower would fit very nicely in my new yard versus other towers I have.  My intial thought is to go ahead and build it.  My second thought is to sell it and buy a substitute.

Just curious on anyones thoughts. 

NYC Willy
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • 575 posts
Posted by alfadawg01 on Sunday, April 19, 2009 11:10 PM

Sounds like a no-brainer to me.....build it and use it with pride! 

Bill

http://www.wjwcreative.com
http://www.soundcloud.com/wjwilcox

"Never try to teach a pig to sing.  It wastes your time and annoys the pig"

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Anderson Indiana
  • 1,301 posts
Posted by rogerhensley on Monday, April 20, 2009 6:53 AM

 Build it.

Roger Hensley
= ECI Railroad - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/eci/eci_new.html =
= Railroads of Madison County - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: northern nj
  • 2,477 posts
Posted by lvanhen on Monday, April 20, 2009 7:07 AM

Unlike fine wine, it won't appreciate with age!!  Build it!!!Smile

Lou V H Photo by John
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Monday, April 20, 2009 7:14 AM

Is it this one?

Whether it is or not, no one will get as much pleasure from what's in that box than you will.  If you're worried about "collectability" of the kit, well, it's not going to send your kids to college.  It probably won't even buy enough gas to drive them there.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: Seattle, Washington
  • 1,082 posts
Posted by IVRW on Monday, April 20, 2009 8:20 AM
alfadawg01

build it and use it with pride! 

Then auction it off to charity in your later years.

~G4

19 Years old, modeling the Cowlitz, Chehalis, and Cascade Railroad of Western Washington in 1927 in 6X6 feet.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Monday, April 20, 2009 8:32 AM

That was an extremely popular kit in its day; indeed all the Revell structures were nice kits crafted to a high enough standard that they still look pretty good today, the farmhouse and Superior bakery in particular.  At least some of them were designed by Al Armitage a great craftsman who was one of the originators of using styrene plastic in model railroading (and there were outraged letters to Model Railroader about that at the time, including one that I recall that said in essence that if the material could not be soldered it was not a serious model making material).

I remember in the mid 1960s America's Hobby Center, which always had a 2 page ad in Model Railroader back then, offered a package deal of that interlocking tower, an elevated crossing shanty, a crossing shack, and a water tank with spout, all in one Revell box for a total of 98 cents, so that was a real deal.  There were HO scale unpainted figures included if memory serves.

I tended to slop the airplane cement on my kits back then but I imagine a bit of work with a hobby knife and some fine grit sandpaper could undo the damage, especially since I'd now be painting the kits which I did not do back then (just as well I didn't).  I know I have the built kits around here somewhere.  By the way, for those that never built this kit, the windows were interesting -- plastic frame and center sill but what look like muntins were white printed on clear plastic.  If assembled and centered with a bit of care, it could look pretty good as you can see from the photo above.

Somewhat OT but someone once told me the crossing shanty is an authentic model of a Chicago & North Western prototype.

My recollection is that those Revell molds found several owners after Revell left the model train business.  Con-Cor, Tyco, and maybe AHM or IHC might at various times have taken up these kits.  I seem to recall that from time to time Revell would make a sort of half hearted stab at reentering the model train field.  Indeed I cannot swear that the structures are not still being made by someone somewhere even today.  The structures are a fairly common item at swap meets either built up or still boxed so unless you actually have someone currently dangling real money in front of you for the unbuilt kit, I agree with the other posters here and say, build it.

Consider painting it before you do.  There really is no practical way to mask those windows once it is built.  And with a few modifcations, such as changing the stairway approach, filing down the shingle roof and replacing it with tar paper, a simple interior, and other such modifications, it won't look quite so generic and common.

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 3,139 posts
Posted by chutton01 on Monday, April 20, 2009 9:44 AM

dknelson
that said in essence that if the material could not be soldered it was not a serious model making material

So how did they solder wood back in that era anyway?

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Monday, April 20, 2009 9:53 AM

chutton01

dknelson
that said in essence that if the material could not be soldered it was not a serious model making material

So how did they solder wood back in that era anyway?

You see?  We really are starting to lose those old techniques with all this RTR stuff.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, April 20, 2009 10:09 AM

Willy,Build it and enjoy it..

 

You see ConCor also release the line of Revell buildings including the interlocker...

 

You can still find these old interlockers at train shows for $5.00-12.00 already built.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, April 20, 2009 10:20 AM

MisterBeasley

chutton01

dknelson
that said in essence that if the material could not be soldered it was not a serious model making material

So how did they solder wood back in that era anyway?

You see?  We really are starting to lose those old techniques with all this RTR stuff.

 Its not the RTR stuff..We still need to solder.Many young modelers fail to realize the soldering gun isn't a new tool nor is many of the so called "new" modeling techniques..Laugh

 

I was taught to solder with a iron heated by a open flame burner..

 

My dad had Weller soldering gun and a pencil type but,wanted me to learn how to solder with a heated iron first..

 

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 3,139 posts
Posted by chutton01 on Monday, April 20, 2009 10:42 AM

BRAKIE

MisterBeasley

chutton01

dknelson
that said in essence that if the material could not be soldered it was not a serious model making material

So how did they solder wood back in that era anyway?

You see?  We really are starting to lose those old techniques with all this RTR stuff.

 Its not the RTR stuff..We still need to solder.Many young modelers fail to realize the soldering gun isn't a new tool nor is many of the so called "new" modeling techniques..Laugh

I was taught to solder with a iron heated by a open flame burner..

My dad had Weller soldering gun and a pencil type but,wanted me to learn how to solder with a heated iron first..


Brakie man, I think you just double whoosed me on my soldering snark - unless you really can solder wood together, as opposed to just charring it with the soldering iron.
I'm happy I started soldering w/ a gun (my Dad's old 1960s ray-gun style w/ lights that lit when you pulled the trigger!), and went on to a pencil type for the odd soldering jobs (mostly soldering electrical connections, or making painting jigs using alligator clips and brass tubing) - I couldn't image soldering detail parts to a locomotive using a heated iron.
Anyway, the OP definiately shouldn't use a soldering iron when assembling his Revell Interlocking Tower - if it was a beat up gondola that needs distressed, warped side panels, that's different.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, April 20, 2009 11:14 AM

Brakie man, I think you just double whoosed me on my soldering snark - unless you really can solder wood together, as opposed to just charring it with the soldering iron.
----------------------

Actually we found Doublemint gum would hold wood together till the hobby shop got good ole Ambroid in stock..Whistling

 

Seriously if it was wood it was passable for a freight car..Metal was superior to those "cheap" plastic cars that will surely ruin the hobby.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Monday, April 20, 2009 11:50 AM

. . . . . . . . . . 1962/1963! That is indeed an oldie and it may or may not be a collectible especially if it has never been out of the box.

I would say build it as is. I don't know whether the kit you are referring to is the one in MisterBeasley's photograph or not but as I looked at that photo it brought back some memories of the club in Massachusetts in 1965. Several of these had been assembled intact at the throats of a couple of our yards while several others had been the focus of numerous kitbashing projects and you could see these bashes scattered across the layout.

Surprisingly--and again this is conjectural that the one you are talking about is the same as the one in MisterBeasley's photograph--when I began building my first HO-Scale layout following my retirement from the Air Force in 1978 I encountered one of these kits at a going-out-of-busines--it was a real going-out-of-business--sale; the box had become very well worn from handling over the years but at $1.00 it was a bargain and somebody, undoubtedly, picked it up and it is probably gathering dust on a layout some place.   

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Ohio
  • 98 posts
Posted by NYC-Big 4 on Monday, April 20, 2009 2:24 PM

Thanks for the input.  There's something to be said about having items on your layout that you have had since you were a kid (45 years +) and it blends in with your current scheme. 

NYC Willy
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Monday, April 20, 2009 3:00 PM

 

chutton01

dknelson
that said in essence that if the material could not be soldered it was not a serious model making material

So how did they solder wood back in that era anyway?

All self respecting modelers cut up tin cans and scribed them to look like wood before soldering the model together.  It was wooden kits that ruin this hobby.

 

Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh

Enjoy

Paul

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Indy
  • 997 posts
Posted by mononguy63 on Monday, April 20, 2009 3:26 PM

dknelson
I remember in the mid 1960s America's Hobby Center, which always had a 2 page ad in Model Railroader back then, offered a package deal of that interlocking tower, an elevated crossing shanty, a crossing shack, and a water tank with spout, all in one Revell box for a total of 98 cents, so that was a real deal.  There were HO scale unpainted figures included if memory serves.

Yes indeed they did. That was my first ever model railroad structure kit from way back when. The interlocking tower (as represented by Mr. Beasley's photo) and shack remain in service on the present layout. The others are biding their time in a box but will probably see sunlight again once I find a good place for them.

"I am lapidary but not eristic when I use big words." - William F. Buckley

I haven't been sleeping. I'm afraid I'll dream I'm in a coma and then wake up unconscious.  -Stephen Wright

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Monday, April 20, 2009 4:19 PM

NYC-Big 4

Thanks for the input.  There's something to be said about having items on your layout that you have had since you were a kid (45 years +) and it blends in with your current scheme. 

When I originally bought most of my rolling stock, it was "modern era."  Now, it's "late Transition era."  Funny how that happens.

When I first built this kit, I was struck by how much nicer it looked than the Plasticville structures I'd been happy with until then.  It was a step up for me.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Monday, April 20, 2009 5:01 PM

chutton01

dknelson
that said in essence that if the material could not be soldered it was not a serious model making material

So how did they solder wood back in that era anyway?

Heh heh good point -- I didn't say the guy won a prize for logic -- and in fact that letter writer took some heat from others if I recall correctly.  The Armitage article that incited the anger showed a steam locomotive boiler and cab that had been built from styrene as I recall and I suspect that was the origin of the letter writer's anger -- a direct challenge to metal fabrication from plastic. 

Plus at least at that time plastic was replacing mostly metal in kits -- consider the Athearn, Varney and Roundhouse freight cars -- so the anti plastic guys were mostly guys who liked metal and saw plastic muscling in. 

I agree on the virtues of having soldering skills, and wish mine were better at stuff beyond soldering feeder wires to rails to things like caboose handrails.  But I also think plastic is a great scratch building materal.   

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, April 20, 2009 5:26 PM

IRONROOSTER

 

chutton01

dknelson
that said in essence that if the material could not be soldered it was not a serious model making material

So how did they solder wood back in that era anyway?

All self respecting modelers cut up tin cans and scribed them to look like wood before soldering the model together.  It was wooden kits that ruin this hobby.

 

Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh

Enjoy

Paul

 

OH! That was the way the of it..

 

Fool me all these years!

 

LaughLaughLaughLaugh

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Ohio
  • 98 posts
Posted by NYC-Big 4 on Monday, April 20, 2009 7:25 PM

Back in the seventies I started modeling the Late Transition Era when I acquired more steam engines.  I can still can vision the some of the steam engines from the mid-fifties.  I don't recall the diesels much from back then until they were all that was running.

Of all the Plastiville buildings I have packed away the covered bridge is still one I plan on using.  It was never glued together or painted with my primative modeling skills back then and can be readily retrofitted.   

NYC Willy
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 7:26 PM
I recall the interlocking tower as being modeled after a Santa Fe prototype.

Ed
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Upstate NY
  • 229 posts
Posted by MikeFF on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 7:36 PM
All the Revell kits were top notch. I just installed a factory I made from two Superior Bakery kits on the fourth layout I've built it thirty years and purchased a Weekly Herald on eBay. Last I knew, Heljan seemed to have the molds. Build that tower!

Mike

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!